Global Benchmarking of Lithium Grade in Geothermal Brine and the Feasibility of Recovery from the Menengai Field in Nakuru County Kenya
Authors
Kabarak University, P.O. Box Private Bag - 20157 (Kenya)
Kabarak University, P.O. Box Private Bag - 20157 (Kenya)
Kabarak University, P.O. Box Private Bag - 20157 (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000073
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 1077-1090
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-19
Accepted: 2026-09-24
Published: 2026-10-06
Abstract
The limits used for assessing lithium recovery from geothermal brine are those widely cited as 50 mg/L, but not always tested against the systems that have been developed. In this study, the Menengai geothermal field was compared against thirty two geothermal and brine fields around the world and the following questions were asked: What are the physical properties of the brines that make them developed or undeveloped? Twenty-nine samples of brine from the Menengai area were analysed by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry and comparison systems were taken from published geochemical surveys. The capacity of each property to discriminate developed systems was quantified by the area under the ROC curve with stratified bootstrap confidence intervals, and position was expressed in terms of percentile rank, after regressing the data for each property on total dissolved solids to remove the confounding effect of bulk salinity. Principal component analysis and Ward clustering were used to analyze the behavior of multivariate structure. Menengai was the 28th of 33 systems with a grade of Lithium, and ranked at the 18th percentile. There is a significant global correlation between salinity and lithium (slope = 1.019, 95% CI = 0.734 to 1.303; R² = 0.632), and Menengai had 0.32 times the lithium expected for its salinity, ranking it one of the most depleted in this regard. When discriminated developed systems were considered, grade discriminated almost perfectly (AUC 0.951, 95% CI 0.852 to 1.000) with a Youden-optimal threshold set at 150mg/L (95% CI 150 to 195), a threefold increase from the nominal and eighty-eightfold increase from the Menengai mean. The ratio of magnesium and lithium did not discriminate between developed and non-developed systems, but five out of six developed systems had higher ratios than Menengai. The purity of geothermal brines is not the factor that determines what is developed, it is the grade, and at the present time, the brines at Menengai aren't sufficiently pure to allow recovery of lithium.
Keywords
benchmarking; bootstrap; economic feasibility
Downloads
References
1. Arnórsson, S. (Ed.). (2000). Isotopic and chemical techniques in geothermal exploration, development and use. International Atomic Energy Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ellis, A. J., & Mahon, W. A. J. (1977). Chemistry and geothermal systems. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Flexer, V., Baspineiro, C. F., & Galli, C. I. (2018). Lithium recovery from brines: A vital raw material for green energies with a potential environmental impact in its mining and processing. Science of the Total Environment, 639, 1188–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fortier, S. M., Nassar, N. T., Lederer, G. W., Brainard, J., Gambogi, J., & McCullough, E. A. (2018). Draft critical mineral list—Summary of methodology and background information (Open-File Report 2018–1021). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20181021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fournier, R. O. (1977). Chemical geothermometers and mixing models for geothermal systems. Geothermics, 5(1–4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(77)90007-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Gallup, D. L. (2009). Production engineering in geothermal technology: A review. Geothermics, 38(3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Giggenbach, W. F. (1988). Geothermal solute equilibria. Derivation of Na-K-Mg-Ca geoindicators. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 52(12), 2749–2765. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(88)90143-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Grosjean, C., Miranda, P. H., Perrin, M., & Poggi, P. (2012). Assessment of world lithium resources and consequences of their geographic distribution on the expected development of the electric vehicle industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(3), 1735–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kaasalainen, H., & Stefánsson, A. (2012). The chemistry of trace elements in surface geothermal waters and steam, Iceland. Chemical Geology, 330–331, 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.08.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kipng'ok, J. (2011). Fluid chemistry, feed zones and boiling in the first geothermal exploration well at Menengai, Kenya. United Nations University Geothermal Training Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Leat, P. T. (1984). Geological evolution of the trachytic caldera volcano Menengai, Kenya Rift Valley. Journal of the Geological Society, 141(6), 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.141.6.1057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mibei, G. (2012). Geology and hydrothermal alteration of Menengai geothermal field. United Nations University Geothermal Training Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Millot, R., Hegan, A., & Négrel, P. (2012). Geothermal waters from the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand: Li, B and Sr isotopes characterization. Applied Geochemistry, 27(3), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.12.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Munk, L. A., Hynek, S. A., Bradley, D. C., Boutt, D., Labay, K., & Jochens, H. (2016). Lithium brines: A global perspective. Reviews in Economic Geology, 18, 339–365. https://doi.org/10.5382/Rev.18.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Neupane, G., & Wendt, D. S. (2017). Assessment of mineral resources in geothermal brines in the US. In Proceedings of the 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nicholson, K. (1993). Geothermal fluids: Chemistry and exploration techniques. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77844-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Omenda, P. A. (1998). The geology and structural controls of the Olkaria geothermal system, Kenya. Geothermics, 27(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(97)00028-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011). pROC: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sanjuan, B., Gourcerol, B., Millot, R., Rettenmaier, D., Jeandel, E., & Rombaut, A. (2022). Lithium-rich geothermal brines in Europe: An update about geochemical characteristics and implications for potential Li resources. Geothermics, 101, 102385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Stringfellow, W. T., & Dobson, P. F. (2021). Technology for the recovery of lithium from geothermal brines. Energies, 14(20), 6805. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Yun, R., & Xiang, X. (2021). Recent advances in magnesium/lithium separation and lithium extraction technologies from salt lake brine. Separation and Purification Technology, 256, 117807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Youden, W. J. (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3(1), 32–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar