Government e-Marketplace (GeM) as a Catalyst for Digital Governance and Employment Generation: An Experience-Based Case Study of Government Colleges in Chhattisgarh

The Government e-Marketplace (GeM) has transformed public procurement in India by introducing a transparent, technology-driven, and paperless procurement ecosystem. Since its launch in 2016, GeM has played a significant role in promoting digital governance, enhancing procurement efficiency, encouraging participation of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), and generating employment opportunities. Government educational institutions are among the major beneficiaries of this digital procurement platform, particularly in the procurement of laboratory equipment, computers, office equipment, furniture, ICT devices, and other academic resources.
This study examines the role of GeM in strengthening digital governance and employment generation through an experience-based case study of Government Colleges in Chhattisgarh. Unlike conventional review studies, the present research integrates the author's professional experience in handling GeM procurement with secondary information obtained from Government reports, policy documents, and published literature. The study highlights the operational benefits of GeM, including transparency, competitive pricing, reduced procurement time, digital documentation, improved accountability, and wider participation of vendors.
The findings indicate that GeM has simplified procurement procedures in Government Colleges by replacing conventional manual purchasing with an efficient online procurement system. The platform has also created employment opportunities for procurement professionals, digital service providers, logistics companies, MSMEs, and technology-based enterprises. Furthermore, the study identifies practical challenges such as digital literacy gaps, internet connectivity issues, vendor awareness, technical support limitations, and logistics in remote areas of Chhattisgarh.
Based on the findings, the study suggests several policy recommendations. These include setting up GeM support centres at the district level, providing training programmes to improve skills, offering digital procurement training, and strengthening the connection between educational institutions and digital governance initiatives. The study concludes that GeM is not merely a procurement portal but an important instrument for promoting transparency, institutional efficiency, employment generation, and sustainable digital governance in higher education institutions.

Government e-Marketplace, GeM, Digital Governance, Public Procurement

1. Bof, F., &Previtali, P. (2007). National models of public e-procurement in Europe. Journal of e-Government Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Croom, S. R., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007). Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the public sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 294–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Government e-Marketplace. (2024). Annual Report 2023–24. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Government of India. (2017). General Financial Rules (GFR), 2017. Ministry of Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Government of Chhattisgarh. (2024). Department of Higher Education Annual Report. Government of Chhattisgarh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Glas, A., &Eßig, M. (2018). Factors influencing supplier participation in public procurement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(1), 65–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hoekman, B., &Taş, B. K. O. (2022). Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing. Small Business Economics, 58(1), 383–402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ministry of Commerce and Industry. (2024). Government e-Marketplace Performance Report. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. (2023). Digital India Programme Report. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. (2024). Annual Report 2023–24. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. NITI Aayog. (2021). Digital India and Public Procurement. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. OECD. (2015). OECD Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. OECD. (2019). Reforming Public Procurement. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Thai, K. V. (2001). Public procurement re-examined. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 9–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Bank. (2016). Benchmarking Public Procurement 2016. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. World Bank. (2020). GovTech Maturity Index. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Directorate of Industries, Chhattisgarh. (2023). MSME Development Report. Government of Chhattisgarh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Reserve Bank of India. (2024). Annual Report 2023–24. Reserve Bank of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Digital Government. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet