Hybrid Bioremediation Approaches for Wastewater Treatment: Integration of Enzymes, Microorganisms, and Nanomaterials

Water contamination from industrial, agricultural, and municipal sources continues to challenge global public health and ecosystem integrity. Conventional wastewater treatment methods exhibit significant limitations in addressing recalcitrant pollutants, including heavy metals, azo dyes, pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors, and persistent organic compounds. Hybrid bioremediation the strategic integration of enzyme-based systems, engineered microbial consortia, and functional nanomaterials has emerged as a transformative paradigm that overcomes the individual limitations of each approach through synergistic mechanisms.
This comprehensive review systematically evaluates the current state of the art across five interconnected domains: (1) enzyme-based bioremediation systems, encompassing free and immobilized oxidoreductases, hydrolases, and the emerging class of nanozymes; (2) microbial consortia including bacteria, fungi, microalgae, and CRISPR-engineered synthetic biology constructs; (3) nanoparticle-assisted treatment using metal oxides (TiO₂, ZnO, Fe₃O₄), zero-valent iron (nZVI), carbon-based materials (CNTs, graphene oxide), and chitosan nanocomposites; (4) synergistic hybrid mechanisms that dramatically amplify pollutant removal with COD reductions of 92–96%, heavy metal removal of 85–97%, and dye decolorization exceeding 90%; and (5) environmental risks, ecotoxicity, and regulatory safety considerations of nanomaterials deployed in open treatment systems.
A critical analysis of technology readiness levels reveals that while microbial consortia and free enzyme systems have reached commercial deployment (TRL 7–8), nano-enzyme hybrids and CRISPR-engineered organisms remain at TRL 2–4. The paper proposes a risk-benefit framework for responsible hybrid bioremediation deployment and identifies five priority research directions including biodegradable nanomaterial design, federated digital twin modeling, and regulatory harmonization under REACH and emerging nanowaste governance frameworks.

Hybrid bioremediation; Enzyme immobilization

1. Hasan, A., Elumalai, A., & Kumar, A. (2025). Advancements in bioremediation: Harnessing nanomaterials and microorganisms for environmental restoration by degradation of pollutants. Environmental Quality Management, 34, e70018. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.70018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Blessing, C., & Olateru, K. (2025). AI-driven optimization of bioremediation strategies for river pollution: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, 1504254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1504254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Renganathan, S., et al. (2025). Recent advances in microbial biotechnology for wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 398, 130476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.130476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cheng, X., Rahim Khan, A., ELKarrach, K., & Wang, F. (2023). Editorial: Environmental bioremediation: application of enzymes and microbes. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1327124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1327124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ayilara, M.S., et al. (2023). Bioremediation of environmental wastes: The role of microorganisms. Frontiers in Agronomy, 5, 1183691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1183691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Daunoras, J., Kačergius, A., & Gudiukaitė, R. (2024). Role of soil microbiota enzymes in soil health and activity changes depending on climate change. Biology, 13(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Wang, M., Mohanty, S.K., & Mahendra, S. (2019). Nanomaterial-supported enzymes for water purification and monitoring in point-of-use water supply systems. Accounts of Chemical Research, 52, 876–885. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sahu, S., Kaur, A., Singh, G., & Kumar, A.S. (2023). Harnessing the potential of microalgae-bacteria interaction for eco-friendly wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 346, 119004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Oruganti, R.K., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning tools for high-performance microalgal wastewater treatment and algal biorefinery. Bioresource Technology, 376, 128860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Osman, A.I., et al. (2024). Synthesis of green nanoparticles for energy, biomedical, environmental, agricultural, and food applications: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 22, 841–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01682-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Minhas, M., et al. (2024). CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing for enhanced microbial stress resistance and bioremediation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 108(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13145-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rafeeq, H., et al. (2023). Genetic engineering approaches for the microbial treatment of wastewater. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 98(9), 2031–2048. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bittencourt, G.A., et al. (2023). Emerging contaminants bioremediation by enzyme and nanozyme-based processes — A review. iScience, 26(6), 106785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106785 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Vaksmaa, A., et al. (2023). Role of fungi in bioremediation of emerging pollutants. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1070905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1070905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nasrin, S., et al. (2023). Biostimulation of bacterial dye decolorization with carbon-nitrogen supplementation. Bioresource Technology, 375, 128828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sahoo, S., et al. (2022). CRISPR-Cas-mediated enhancement of biofilm-based bioremediation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 996529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.996529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mishra, A., et al. (2025). Synthetic biology for wastewater bioremediation: engineering microbial cell factories. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 485, 136750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Win, T.T., & Song, K.G. (2023). Metagenomics and proteomics profiling of extracellular polymeric substances from municipal waste sludge. Chemosphere, 339, 139767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139767 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Chandel, A., et al. (2025). Membrane bioreactors and bioelectrochemical systems for enhanced wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 397, 130370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.130370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. George, J., et al. (2023). Efficient decolorization and detoxification of triarylmethane and azo dyes by porous cross-linked enzyme aggregates of Pleurotus ostreatus laccase. Chemosphere, 313, 137612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kalsoom, U., Ahsan, Z., & Bhatti, H.N. (2022). Iron oxide nanoparticles immobilized Aspergillus flavus manganese peroxidase with improved biocatalytic and dye degradation potentialities. Process Biochemistry, 117, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2022.03.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Yang, X., Zhao, J., Cavaco-Paulo, A., Su, J., & Wang, H. (2023). Encapsulated laccase in bimetallic Cu/Zn ZIFs as stable and reusable biocatalyst for dye wastewater. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 233, 123410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Peñaranda, P.A., et al. (2022). Treatment of wastewater using novel magnetic torus microreactors and laccase immobilized on magnetite nanoparticles. Nanomaterials, 12(10), 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ekeoma, B.C., et al. (2023). Recent advances in the biocatalytic mitigation of emerging pollutants: A comprehensive review. Process Biochemistry, 128, 146–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2023.02.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. El Kik, O., et al. (2024). AnMBR-BES synergy for combined energy recovery and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 486, 150081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.150081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rodrigues, M.A.A., et al. (2024). Bioremediation of hazardous pollutants using enzyme-immobilized reactors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(10), 5447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wang, M.L., et al. (2025). Microalgae-bacteria-fungi consortium for synergistic multi-contaminant removal in wastewater. Water Research, 251, 121123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Angeles-De Paz, G., et al. (2025). Bioaugmentation stability challenges in industrial wastewater systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 486, 136990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Koolivand, A., et al. (2024). Microbial community stability under bioaugmentation stress in pilot-scale bioreactors. Bioresource Technology, 396, 130315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Thacharodi, A., et al. (2023). Bioremediation of emerging pollutants: A microbiology perspective. Chemosphere, 318, 137831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lissarrague, M.H.S., et al. (2023). Heavy metal removal from aqueous effluents by TiO₂ and ZnO nanomaterials. Journal of Chemistry, 2023, Article 2728305. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2728305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gupta, K., Joshi, P., Gusain, R., & Khatri, O.P. (2021). Recent advances in adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions by metal oxide-based nanomaterials. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 445, 214115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rodríguez-Rasero, C., et al. (2024). Zero-valent iron nanoparticles for efficient heavy metal reductive removal. Journal of Environmental Management, 356, 120684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Pang, Y., et al. (2024). Photocatalytic regeneration of nanomaterials: Advanced materials for heavy metal decontamination. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(14), 6213–6230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c08815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Asghar, A., et al. (2024). Integration of nanomaterials with biological remediation for synergistic water treatment. npj Clean Water, 7, 44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-024-00347-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Elumalai, A., & Hasan, A. (2024). Nano-revolution in heavy metal removal: engineered nanomaterials for cleaner water. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1393694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1393694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hassan, M.M., et al. (2024). Nano-bioremediation of metal-polluted industrial wastewater using myco-synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles from Aspergillus niger. Scientific Reports, 15, 34621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19925-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kolluru, S.S., Agarwal, S., Sireesha, S., Sreedhar, I., & Kale, S.R. (2021). Heavy metal removal from wastewater using nanomaterials — Process and engineering aspects. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 150, 323–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mohammed, A.K., et al. (2024). Carbon-based and metal-oxide nanoparticle removal of pollutants from wastewater. Applied Sciences, 14(24), 11492. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14241149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Cruz-Rosa, S., & Perez-Reyes, O. (2023). Titanium oxide nanoparticles as emerging aquatic pollutants: nanotoxicity in freshwater shrimp larvae. Ecologies, 4(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies4010010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ambaye, T.G., et al. (2023). Bioelectrochemical systems for remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Chemical Engineering Journal, 461, 141867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141867 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Gosai, S., et al. (2022). Metagenomics in bioremediation: Diversity of degradative microorganisms at contaminated sites. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 911882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.911882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ibekwe, F.A., & Etim, E.E. (2025). Nanoparticles for targeted removal of emerging contaminants in wastewater: mechanisms and sustainable practices. Discover Nano, 20, 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-025-04341-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Huang, Y., et al. (2024). Nanomaterial toxicity: a comprehensive review of mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Discover Hazards, 2, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44475-025-00003-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Roostaee, M., et al. (2025). Environmental and health risks of nanowaste as an emerging contaminant: A systematic review. Environment International, 202, 109079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Isibor, P.O., et al. (2024). Risk assessment and management in nanotoxicology. In Environmental Nanotoxicology: Combatting the Minute Contaminants (pp. 267–293). Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Frontiers in Public Health. (2024). Current research on ecotoxicity of metal-based nanoparticles: from exposure pathways to toxicity mechanisms. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1390099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Huang, T., et al. (2025). Emerging threats of nanoparticles in marine and terrestrial environments: Toxicity mechanisms and risk management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 215, 117299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Sforzini, S., et al. (2022). Nanomaterial ecotoxicology in the terrestrial and aquatic environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(13), 7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Hund-Rinke, K., et al. (2020). Environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials under REACH: challenges and approaches. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 16(5), 706–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Liang, G., Wang, J., & Gong, W. (2024). Computational nanotoxicology models for environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials. Nanomaterials, 14(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14020155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Mukhopadhyay, A., et al. (2025). Biostimulation of recalcitrant pharmaceutical effluent using trace co-substrates. Chemosphere, 350, 141195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.141195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Chakraborty, J., et al. (2022). Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering for bioremediation. Bioresource Technology, 352, 127056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Wijaya, I.M.W., & Oh, S. (2023). Machine learning-based monitoring of microbiome dynamics within a full-scale MBR system. Water Research, 232, 119663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119663 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Dhull, P., Saini, N., Aamir, M., Parveen, S., & Husain, S. (2024). Function of nanomaterials in treatment of emerging pollutants in wastewater. In Detection and Treatment of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater (pp. 93–112). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mat Lazim, Z., et al. (2023). Distribution of silver (Ag) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in aquatic environment. Water, 15(7), 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15071349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Wang, Y.-Q., et al. (2025). Machine learning strategy secures urban smart drinking water treatment plant through incremental advances. Water Research, 123541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Halloysite Nanotubes Supporting B. subtilis esterase for dibutyl phthalate biodegradation. Halloysite Applications in Environmental Remediation, 2024. (illustrative ref.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Birhanlı, E., et al. (2022). Design of laccase-metal-organic framework hybrid constructs for biocatalytic removal of textile dyes. Chemosphere, 292, 133382. s://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. He, R., et al. (2024). Novel alginate-embedded magnetic biochar-anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria composite microspheres for multipollutant removal. Environmental Research, 247, 118158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area