Impact of Artificial Intelligence Adoption and Leadership Styles on Strategic Planning Effectiveness in the Philippine Techno Firms
Authors
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Graduate School of Business, National University (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000031
Subject Category: Business Management
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 337- 351
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-06
Accepted: 2026-03-11
Published: 2026-03-26
Abstract
This quantitative, descriptive-correlational study examined the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and leadership styles on strategic planning effectiveness among technology firms in the Philippines. Guided by frameworks from Biloslavo et al. (2024), Gichuki et al. (2024), and Phillips and Moutinho (2000), the study explored how leadership behaviors mediate the relationship between AI integration and effective planning. A total of 105 executives and managers participated in the survey, using a validated questionnaire with a reliability range of .71 to .91 across three scales. Descriptive statistics revealed very high levels of AI adoption (M = 6.40, SD = 0.79) and strategic planning effectiveness (M = 6.30, SD = 0.79), and a high level of leadership styles (M = 5.64, SD = 0.61). Pearson’s correlation showed significant positive relationships among the three variables, while multiple regression confirmed that AI adoption and leadership styles collectively explained 72% of the variance in strategic planning effectiveness (R² = .72, p < .001). Mediation analysis further indicated that leadership styles significantly mediated the relationship between AI adoption and strategic planning outcomes (β = 0.31, p < .001). The findings underscore the importance of aligning AI initiatives with effective leadership to achieve sustainable organizational planning. The study recommends enhancing leadership development programs to strengthen digital integration strategies and maximize the benefits of AI in strategic management.
Keywords
artificial intelligence adoption, leadership styles, strategic planning effectiveness, mediation, technology firms
Downloads
References
1. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Biloslavo, R., Edgar, D., Aydin, E., & Bulut, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) and strategic planning process within VUCA environments: A research agenda and guidelines. Management Decision. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Csaszar, F. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and strategic decision-making: Evidence from firms. Strategic Science Journal, 13(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2024.0190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gichuki, G. K., Karanja, K., & Atikiya, R. (2024). The influence of transformational and transactional leadership styles on the implementation of strategic plans by devolved governments in Kenya. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology, 23(2), 76–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Khuong, M. N. (2022). A review of empirical research on leadership and firm performance. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221109588 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Mousa, K. M. (2024). Strategic planning and organizational performance: Integrating sustainability and digital transformation perspectives. Sustainability, 16(15), 6690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Phillips, P. A., & Moutinho, L. (2000). The strategic planning index: A tool for measuring strategic planning effectiveness. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750003800407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Sellke, T. M., Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. (2001). Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses. The American Statistician, 55(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001300339950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Empowering SME Performance Through Social Media: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs
- Effective School Bullying Prevention Strategies: A Thematic Review
- Impact of Workplace Conflict on the Operational Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Enugu State.
- Towards Digital Financial Solutions: A Conceptual Model of SME Strategies and Strategic Development
- Effect of Work-Life Balance and Affective Commitment on Employee Performance in the Hotel Industry in Plateau State