Impact of Different Cropping Systems on Growth, Yield, and Profitability of Pag-Asa 7 Mungbean Variety Inoculated with Mykovam®

Authors

Oliver Musa Lavelah

Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Faculty of the Department of Agriculture, Liberia International Christian College (LICC), Gompa City (Liberia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1304000102

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 13/4 | Page No: 1090-1104

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-06

Accepted: 2026-04-12

Published: 2026-05-04

Abstract

Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) is the most important food legume in Liberia in terms of agricultural area and production value. National data shows that mongo (mungbean) production in the Philippines peaked in 2023 at a value of ₱232 million, but sharply declined to ₱97 million in 2024. This marks a significant downturn compared to the steady growth reported between 2013 and 2017. Production of mungbean in Liberia, the Philippines, and the world as a whole serves three fundamental purposes: the grains are used as a source for eating rice, as food, livestock feed, and vegetable oil. This research was performed to determine the yield and yield parameters of mungbean, cropping systems when intercropped in three maize varieties, and Mykovam® inoculation. The research was laid out under a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) having mungbean (Pag-asa 7), and three open-pollinated varieties of maize (IPB Variety 6, IPB 1910, and Los Baños Lagkitan) intercropped, and Mykovam® inoculation under 14 cropping systems. Plant height, Leaf Area Index (LAI), and k-light attenuation were measured as agronomic parameters. Several pod per plant, pod weight, pod length, number of seeds per pod, and a thousand (1000) grain weight were measured as yield parameters of Pag-asa 7 mungbean. Mungbean intercropped in IPB Variety 6 stands as the exceptional cropping system for growth, yield, and productivity, Mungbean intercropped with Los Baños Lagkitan without inoculation achieved the highest LER of 1.05 which indicates 11.7% better land utilization efficiency and higher productivity, Grain yield of mungbean at 14% MC performed better under mono-crop condition with Mykovam® inoculation with 1.73 Mg ha-1 Highest gross return (GR) in mungbean was obtained in Monocrop Mungbean inoculated with Mykovam® ₱ 123,217 ha-1 making it the most profitable cropping system.

Keywords

Growth, yield Pag-asa 7, Mungbean, Mykovam inoculation

Downloads

References

1. Adeleye, B. N., Gershon, O., Ogundipe, A., Owolabi, O., Ogunrinola, I., & Adediran, O. (2020). Comparative investigation of the growth-poverty-inequality trilemma in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin American and Caribbean Countries. Heliyon, 6(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akchaya, K., Parasuraman, P., Pandian, K., Vijayakumar, S., Thirukumaran, K., Mustaffa, M. R. A. F., ... & Choudhary, A. K. (2025). Boosting resource use efficiency, soil fertility, food security, ecosystem services, and climate resilience with legume intercropping: a review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1527256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amankwah, A., Ambel, A., Gourlay, S., Kilic, T., Markhof, Y., & Wollburg, P. (2024). Fertilizer price shocks in smallholder agriculture. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Assefa, A., Abate, M., Haile, M., & Hunegnaw, Y. (2025). Land productivity and economic benefit of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) intercropping using intercrop indices and Partial budget analysis in Lasta District, North Eastern Ethiopia. Discover Plants, 2(1), 153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, Z., Wang, L., Cardoso, J. A., Zhu, S., Liu, G., Rao, I. M., & Lin, Y. (2023). Improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency through modification of root growth responses to phosphate starvation in legumes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1094157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Das, A., Das, D., & Richard, A. (2026). Socio-economic constraints to legume adoption among smallholders. Journal of Food Legumes, 39(Special issue), 205-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dimkpa, C., Adzawla, W., Pandey, R., Atakora, W. K., Kouame, A. K., Jemo, M., & Bindraban, P. S. (2023). Fertilizers for food and nutrition security in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of soil health implications. Frontiers in Soil Science, 3, 1123931. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dimkpa, C., Adzawla, W., Pandey, R., Atakora, W. K., Kouame, A. K., Jemo, M., & Bindraban, P. S. (2023). Fertilizers for food and nutrition security in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of soil health implications. Frontiers in Soil Science, 3, 1123931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Favero, V. O., Carvalho, R. H., Motta, V. M., Leite, A. B. C., Coelho, M. R. R., Xavier, G. R., ... & Urquiaga, S. (2021). Bradyrhizobium as the only rhizobial inhabitant of mung bean (Vigna radiata) nodules in tropical soils: a strategy based on microbiome for improving biological nitrogen fixation using bio-products. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 602645. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gong, X., Ji, X., Long, A., Qi, H., & Jiang, Y. (2025). The effect of intercropping on phosphorus availability in plant–soil [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kumari, S., & Maiti, S. K. (2022). Nitrogen recovery in reclaimed mine soil under different amendment practices in tandem with legume and non‐legume revegetation: A review. Soil Use and Management, 38(2), 1113-1145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lavelah, O. M., Edaño, M. L. S., Cruz, P. C. S., & Dizon, J. T. (2021). Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality of Three Maize Varieties and Mungbean under Different Cropping Systems Inoculated with Mykovam®. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(4), 330-337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lesk, C., Anderson, W., Rigden, A., Coast, O., Jägermeyr, J., McDermid, S., ... & Konar, M. (2022). Compound heat and moisture extreme impacts on global crop yields under climate change. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(12), 872-889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Maluki, M. (2023). Growth, nodulation and yield of selected legumes under drought conditions in Kitui county, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. MATHOBO, D. N. (2023). Sustainability of Vegetable Production Systems by Small-Scale Farmers of Limpopo Province in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mekuria, M., Asfaw, D. S., & Tekalign, D. S. (2020). CLIMATE VARIABILITY IMPACTS AND DETERMINANTS ON CHOICE OF ADAPTATION STRATEGIES AMONG SMALLHOLDER FARMERS: THE CASE OF TOCHA WOREDA, DAWRO ZONE, SNNPR, ETHIOPIA (Doctoral dissertation, Haramaya university). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mgwenya, L. (2025). Contextual analysis of government projects for food security in Kabokweni Ehlanzeni district, South Africa (Master's thesis). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Montero, J. M., Roberts, R. J., & Naimy, V. (2025). Revisiting zero hunger from a multidisciplinary perspective: How to measure hunger and reduce it?. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(1), 49-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Naik, S. K., Shinde, R., Mali, S. S., Sarkar, P. K., & Das, A. (2025). Land degradation: A global challenge to environmental sustainability and livelihood security. In Ecological Solutions to Agricultural Land Degradation (pp. 1-27). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Punongbayan, J. C. B. (2024). The Philippine Journal of Development in the Early 21st Century (2002–2023). Philippine Journal of Development, (2), 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Raza, A., Zahra, N., Hafeez, M. B., Ahmad, M., Iqbal, S., Shaukat, K., & Ahmad, G. (2020). Nitrogen fixation of legumes: Biology and Physiology. In The plant family Fabaceae: biology and physiological responses to environmental stresses (pp. 43-74). Singapore: Springer Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Scott, D., & Freckleton, R. P. (2022). Crop diversification and parasitic weed abundance: a global meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 19413. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sonta, M., & Rekiel, A. (2020). Legumes are used for nutritional and feeding purposes. Journal of elementology, 25(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Takhumova, O. (2020, May). Rural development as a leading factor in economic growth. In 6th International Conference on Social, economic, and Academic Leadership (ICSEAL-6-2019) (pp. 275-279). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tamiru, W. (2022). Effect of intercropped forage legumes and their population with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) on the performance and productivity of component crops in East Hararghe, Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Haramaya University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tamiru, W. (2022). Effect of intercropped forage legumes and their population with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) on the performance and productivity of component crops in East Hararghe, Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Haramaya University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Udvardi, M., Below, F. E., Castellano, M. J., Eagle, A. J., Giller, K. E., Ladha, J. K., ... & Peters, J. W. (2021). A research road map for responsible use of agricultural nitrogen. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 660155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, S., Guo, X., Li, Q., Hui, X., ... & Wang, H. (2024). An evaluation of potato fertilization and the potential of farmers to reduce the amount of fertilizer used based on yield and nutrient requirements. Agronomy, 14(3), 612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Weih, M., Karley, A. J., Newton, A. C., Kiær, L. P., Scherber, C., Rubiales, D., ... & Tavoletti, S. (2021). Grain yield stability of cereal-legume intercrops is greater than sole crops in more productive conditions. Agriculture, 11(3), 255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wesseh, C. W. (2024). Food Security Challenges and Opportunities in Liberia: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Available at SSRN 5115934. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yuliana, S., Nurul, H. B., Nani, H., & Rosah, A. A. (2021). Growth and Yield Of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Inoculated By Mycorrhizae And Intercropping With Mungbean In Dry Land. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 117(9), 176-184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles