Impact of Rigid Endoscopy on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Vocal Fold Leukoplakia

Authors

Jeferson Sampaio D’Avila

Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil (Brazil)

Antonio Roberto Ferreira Setton

Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil (Brazil)

Daniel Vasconcelos D’Avila

Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil (Brazil)

Carlos Rodolfo Tavares de Gois

Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil (Brazil)

Paulo Sérgio Lins Perazzo

Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil (Brazil)

Lauro Roberto de Azevedo Setton

Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil (Brazil)

Davi Vasconcelos D’Avila, Ac

Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Aracaju, Brazil (Brazil)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1315PH00051

Subject Category: Medicine

Volume/Issue: 13/15 | Page No: 1892-1895

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-18

Accepted: 2026-03-25

Published: 2026-04-07

Abstract

Background: Vocal fold leukoplakia is the most prevalent premalignant lesion of the larynx and presents heterogeneous biological behavior. Objective: To clinically present surgically treated vocal fold leukoplakia and evaluate the impact of transoperative rigid endoscopy on diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A transversal 30-year comparative study with and without rigid endoscopy was conducted. Results: Rigid endoscopy significantly improved intraoperative diagnostic accuracy and lesion detection. Conclusion: Rigid endoscopy is an indispensable tool for microsurgical treatment of vocal fold leukoplakia.

Keywords

Vocal fold leukoplakia; Rigid endoscopy; Laryngeal microsurgery; Premalignant lesions

Downloads

References

1. Rubinstein M, Fine EL, Sepehr A, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the larynx. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;39(2):150–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dedivitis RA, Pfuetzenreiter EG Jr, Guimarães AV. Contact endoscopy of the larynx. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009;29(1):16–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Setton ARF, D’Avila JS, et al. Variant of the laryngeal microsurgery technique. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;23(1):18–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arens C, Piazza C, et al. Vascular changes in vocal fold lesions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(5):1207–1214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Parker NP. Vocal fold leukoplakia: incidence and management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;25(6):464–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chen M, Cheng L, et al. Nonsurgical treatment for vocal fold leukoplakia. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6958250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li CJ, Chen M, et al. Treatment experience with vocal fold leukoplakia. J Laryngol Otol. 2024;138(4):461–465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Klimza H, et al. Vocal fold leukoplakia recurrence risk model. Sci Rep. 2024;14:266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Koss SL, et al. Serial in-office laser treatment of vocal fold leukoplakia. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(7):1644–1651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen M, Li C, et al. Morphological classification for vocal fold leukoplakia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85(5):588–596. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. D’Avila D, D’Avila J, et al. Premalignant laryngeal lesions: twenty-year experience. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;18(4):352–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. D’Avila JA, et al. Vocal Fold Leukoplakia – 30 Years of Experience. Annals Otolaryngology and Rhinology. 2024;11(4):1340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles