“Impact of Technology Adoption on Quality Assurance Processes and their Benefits and Challenges”

This study strengthens its methodological foundation by integrating additional analytical techniques beyond correlation, specifically regression and model validation, to enhance the interpretive depth and analytical rigor. In today’s increasingly digitized global market, Quality Assurance (QA) is undergoing a significant technological transformation, driven by automation tools, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and real-time data analytics. These technologies offer opportunities for increased efficiency, improved accuracy, and reduced human error in QA processes. However, the integration of new technologies introduces complexities such as high implementation costs, cybersecurity risks, resistance to change, and integration difficulties with legacy systems. Adopting the Goal-Action-Data (GAD) framework, this study investigates the multifaceted impact of technology adoption on QA outcomes, including efficiency, accuracy, and organizational performance.

Technology Adoption, Quality Assurance (QA), Benefits, Challenges, Automation.

1. Al-Shboul, M., Gherbal, N., Ghanem, M., & Al-Debei, M. M. (2022). Barriers and critical success factors for implementing Industry 4.0 in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, J., Cheng, C. C., & Dai, X. (2020). The impact of IT capability on firm performance: The mediating role of digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 14–26. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.jbusres.2020.09.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gunasekaran, A., Yusuf, Y. Y., Adeleye, E. O., & Papadopoulos, T. (2019). Agile manufacturing practices: the role of big data and business analytics with multiple case studies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1395488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., & Mao, J. Y. (2021). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal, 31(1), 136–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12265 American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. The Jamovi Project. (2021). Jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits