Impact of the African Continental Free Trade Area on Manufacturing in Zambia: A Post-2021 Literature Review
Authors
PhD Candidate, Africa Research University, Lusaka (Zambia)
Director of Postgraduate Studies, Africa Research University, Lusaka (Zambia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010036
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 377-389
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-04
Accepted: 2026-01-09
Published: 2026-01-24
Abstract
The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), operational since January 2021, represents the most ambitious trade integration initiative in African history, uniting 54 countries into a single continental market for goods and services. For Least Developed Countries (LDCs) such as Zambia, manufacturing development is central to achieving structural transformation, sustainable employment creation, and export diversification beyond primary commodities. This paper presents a systematic review of contemporary literature published since 2021 to critically assess how AfCFTA is expected to influence four key dimensions of manufacturing development: output growth, competitiveness enhancement, firm-level performance, and institutional capacity for implementation. Employing a structured literature review methodology with explicit inclusion criteria and a conceptual framework linking trade integration mechanisms to manufacturing outcomes, the review synthesises evidence from computable general equilibrium models, structural gravity analyses, policy diagnostics, and early trade data assessments. Findings indicate that while AfCFTA presents substantial opportunities for industrial expansion through market access and regional value chain integration, realising these benefits is highly conditional upon domestic productive capacity, effective trade cost reduction, and robust policy implementation. The literature reveals significant heterogeneity in projected outcomes, with manufacturing gains disproportionately favouring countries that already possess diversified industrial bases. Critically, existing studies rely heavily on simulation models and regional diagnostics, with limited country-specific empirical evidence for Zambia. By systematically synthesising recent scholarship, this paper identifies four critical knowledge gaps and establishes a robust conceptual foundation for future empirical research investigating AfCFTA's manufacturing effects within the Zambian context, proposing specific methodological approaches and data sources for such investigation.
Keywords
AfCFTA; Manufacturing Development; Zambia; Trade Costs
Downloads
References
1. African Union. African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement. Addis Ababa: African Union; 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. Assessing Regional Integration in Africa X: Trade and Industrialisation. Addis Ababa: UNECA; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. African Development Bank. African Economic Outlook 2022: Supporting Climate Resilience and a Just Energy Transition in Africa. Abidjan: AfDB; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Economic Development in Africa Report 2021: Reaping the Potential Benefits of the African Continental Free Trade Area for Inclusive Growth. Geneva: UNCTAD; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Trade and Industrial Policy in Africa: Supporting Manufacturing Development. Paris: OECD; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. World Bank. Zambia Economic Update: Supporting Industrial Growth and Trade Integration. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Central Statistical Office of Zambia. National Accounts Statistics 2022. Lusaka: CSO; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Abrego L, de Zamaróczy M, Gursoy T, Issoufou S, Perez-Saiz H, Nicholls G. The African Continental Free Trade Area: Potential Economic Impact and Challenges. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Felbermayr G, Kimura F, Okubo T. The heterogeneous effects of trade agreements on manufacturing. World Economy. 2021;44(9):2672-2696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ghodsi M, Grübler J, Stehrer R. Early trade effects of the African Continental Free Trade Area. Journal of African Economies. 2023;32(2):173-198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. AfCFTA Country Readiness Assessment: Zambia. Addis Ababa: UNECA; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Signé L, Madden P. The African Continental Free Trade Area: A Game Changer for Industrialisation? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Balchin N, Mendez-Parra M, Papadavid P. Africa's Industrialisation: The Role of Trade and Regional Integration. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. World Bank. Africa's Pulse: An Analysis of Issues Shaping Africa's Economic Future. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. World Bank. Unlocking Africa's Trade Potential: Trade Costs and Facilitation. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ekeocha PC, Ojiako IA, Nwankwo C. Non-tariff barriers and intra-African trade under the AfCFTA. African Development Review. 2022;34(2):356-371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Korinek J, Sourdin P. Digital trade facilitation and firm productivity. Review of International Economics. 2021;29(2):418-439. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Lesser C, Moïsé E. Trade facilitation reforms and firm performance in developing economies. World Trade Review. 2023;22(3):381-402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. AfCFTA Secretariat. AfCFTA Implementation Progress Report. Accra: African Continental Free Trade Area Secretariat; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Amoako-Tuffour J, Asmah E, Konadu-Agyemang K. Institutional readiness and trade facilitation under the AfCFTA. Journal of African Trade. 2022;9(1):1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. International Labour Organization. Zambia Employment and Industrial Policy Review. Geneva: ILO; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2019;104:333-339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Krugman P. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review. 1980;70(5):950-959. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Melitz MJ. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica. 2003;71(6):1695-1725. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. North DC. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria