Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Migration, Livelihood, and Psychosocial Wellbeing of Migrant Construction Workers in Noida and Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh: A Quantitative Study
Authors
Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia University (India)
Professor, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia University (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000061
Subject Category: Psychology
Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 808-825
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-17
Accepted: 2026-09-22
Published: 2026-10-05
Abstract
Background: Migrant construction workers form a large but weakly protected segment of India's informal urban workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing nationwide lockdown disrupted their employment, mobility, housing, and psychosocial wellbeing on an unprecedented scale, yet construction-specific evidence from the National Capital Region remains limited.
Methodology: An exploratory, cross-sectional quantitative design was used. A structured interview schedule was administered to 200 purposively sampled migrant construction workers (100 each from NOIDA and Ghaziabad). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's rank correlation, and exploratory univariate intercept tests. Fisher’s exact tests were used for sparse suicidal-ideation contingency tables. Here, “impact” denotes workers’ self-reported pandemic-related experiences and perceived effects, not an estimate of causal effects.
Results: Respondents were predominantly male (77%), married (77%), and educationally disadvantaged (79.5% with no more than primary schooling). Employment disruption was reported by 91.5% of respondents, and 69.5% reported job loss. Psychological distress was widespread (90.5% reported at least one symptom), and 87.0% reported substance use during the pandemic. Welfare-scheme awareness was negligible (11.6% among respondents), and contractors, not government agencies, were the principal source of support (31.5% vs. 0.5%).
Conclusion: Migrant construction workers reported employment, welfare, and psychosocial vulnerabilities during the pandemic, with support received mainly through informal, contractor-mediated channels rather than formal state mechanisms. Portable welfare entitlements, on-site healthcare, and psychosocial support integrated into labour-welfare schemes are recommended.
Keywords
migrant construction workers; COVID-19; reverse migration; psychosocial distress; informal labour; quantitative study
Downloads
References
1. Ahmed, D., Benavente, P., & Diaz, E. (2023). Food insecurity among international migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Azeez, A. E. P., Negi, D. P., Rani, A., & Kumar, S. A. P. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on migrant women workers in India. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 62(1), 93–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bhagat, R. B. (2014). Urban migration trends, challenges and opportunities in India [Background paper]. International Organization for Migration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Breman, J. (1996). Footloose labour: Working in India's informal economy. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Breman, J. (2013). At work in the informal economy of India: A perspective from the bottom up. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Breman, J. (2016). On pauperism in present and past. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, No. 27 of 1996, India Code (1996). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chen, M. A. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies (WIEGO Working Paper No. 1). Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Deshingkar, P., & Akter, S. (2009). Migration and human development in India (Human Development Research Paper 2009/13). United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. International Labour Organization. (2018). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture (3rd ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ishikawa, K. (1990). Introduction to quality control (J. H. Loftus, Trans.). 3A Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Istiko, S. N., Durham, J., & Elliott, L. (2022). (Not that) essential: A scoping review of migrant workers' access to health services and social protection during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jha, A. (2021). Vulnerability of construction workers during COVID-19: Tracking welfare responses and challenges. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 64(4), 1043–1067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kumar, K., Mehra, A., Sahoo, S., Nehra, R., & Grover, S. (2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on the migrant workers: A cross-sectional survey. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 102252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Moura, H. S. D., Berra, T. Z., Rosa, R. J., Silva, R. V. D. S., Soares, D. de A., de Araujo, J. S. T., Costa, F. B. P., de Souza, R. M. P., do Nascimento, M. C., Teibo, T. K. A., Serrano-Gallardo, M. D. P., & Arcencio, R. A. (2023). Health condition, income loss, food insecurity and other social inequities among migrants and refugees during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1728. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mukherjee, S. (2020). Disparities, desperation, and divisiveness: Coping with COVID-19 in India. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 12(6), 582–584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Pattenden, J. (2016). Labour, state and society in rural India: A class-relational approach. Manchester University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Raj, D., Swain, P. K., Behera, B., & Singh, B. P. (2021). Quantile regression approach for quality of life of construction labourers in Varanasi City, India. Thailand Statistician, 19(1), 58–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Rajan, S. I., Sivakumar, P., & Srinivasan, A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and internal labour migration in India: A "crisis of mobility." The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(4), 1021–1039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5–6), 531–578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Srivastava, R., & Sutradhar, R. (2016). Labour migration to the construction sector in India and its impact on rural poverty. Indian Journal of Human Development, 10(1), 27–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Tanwar, S., Sahu, K. K., Sahu, S., & Singhal, A. K. (2021). Pandemic stress and well-being of migrants. Indian Journal of Psychiatric Social Work, 11(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
- Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
- A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
- Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
- A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being