Implementation of Smart-Eco Bioproduction in Supporting Healthy Food Programs in Sleman Regency

Authors

Intan Nur Khasanah

Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Dewi Zulfah

Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Vidy Berliant Ramadiva

Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Sri Peni Watutiningsih

Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000350

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 5422-5434

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-06

Accepted: 2026-09-11

Published: 2026-09-25

Abstract

The concept of Smart-Eco Bioproduction (SEB) developed by the Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada. It integrates three key aspects environment, economy, and society, which are integrated into the food supply system. SEB aims to produce safe and healthy food products supported by healthy plant cultivation. This study focuses on the social aspects of SEB implementation and the challenges of providing healthy food in Sleman Regency. Using a qualitative research design with a critical constructivism approach. The research involved farmers, agricultural service employees, and extension workers as informants. Findings indicate that SEB implementation engages various institutions, including the agricultural service, farmer groups, certification bodies, universities, and marketing partners. SEB is generally interpreted as eco-friendly farming practices that avoid chemical inputs and emphasize sustainability. However, several challenges remain, such as limited digital marketing capacity, inadequate irrigation systems, and high dependence on farmer group leaders. Moreover, while SEB is understood as a sustainable farming model, its role within the broader framework of healthy food provision requires clearer positioning. To strengthen SEB, farmers need capacity building in both technical and managerial aspects, alongside greater cross-sectoral collaboration. Therefore, strengthening partnerships and institutional support is also essential to ensure the sustainability of SEB in Sleman.

Keywords

agricultural institutions, healthy food, smart-eco bioproduction (SEB)

Downloads

References

1. Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C. I. 2020. Agroecology: Emerging trends and future directions. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ayati, D. P. I., R. Wibowo, dan J. A. Ridjal. 2018. Manajemen usahatani dan faktor-faktor pengambilan keputusan petani padi organik di desa rowosari kecamatan sumberjambe kabupaten jember. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis (JEPA). 2(4): 279-292. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DI Yogyakarta. 2022. Produksi Padi dan Beras Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi DI Yogyakarta 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dewi, S. B. L., R. V. Aulia, dan D. W. Laily. 2024. Implementasi pertanian berkelanjutan dengan memanfaatkan limbah pertanian menjadi pupuk organik cair di desa musir lor kabupaten nganjuk. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia (JAMSI). 4(4): 1067-1076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fajarani, E., E. Wildayana, dan N. E. Putri. 2021. Preferensi konsumen terhadap keputusan pembelian sayuran organik di supermarket diamond kota palembang. Jurnal KaliAgri. 2(1): 38-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Farmia, A. 2022. Identifikasi Peran Kelompok Tani sebagai Unit Produksi dalam Mendukung Pengembangan Usaha Unit Pengolahan Pupuk Organik (UPPO). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Manokwari, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hardaningsih, W., Budianta, D., Madjid, A., Aisyah & Syazili, A. 2024. Organic Farming for Healthy Food Production and Land Sustainability for Supporting a Smart Agriculture in Indonesia. Journal of Smart Agriculture and Environmental Technology (JOSAET), 1(1): 49–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Juniarti, D., Sukesi, K., & Haris, A. 2022. Faktor-Faktor Pencarian Informasi Inovasi Pertanian oleh Petani di Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Media Ilmiah, 10(2): 45–57. Universitas Gadjah Mada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Liu, T., R. J. F. Bruins, and M. T. Heberling. 2018. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of best management practices: a review and synthesis. Sustainability. 10(2): 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Niam, M. F., Rumahlewang, E., Umiyati, H., Dewi, N. P. S., Atiningsih, S., Haryati, T., Maghifroh, I. S., Anggraini, R. I., Mamenkgo, R. P., Fathin, S., Mola, M. S. R., Syafiudin, A. A., & Wajdi, F. 2024. Metode penelitian kualitatif. Widina Media Utama. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nuraisyah, N.S.T., D. Rahman, dan Sultani. 2024. Strategi pemberdayaan petani dalam pembangunan agribisnis inklusif. JIIC: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia. 1(10): 7618-7627. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nurlaela, S., Suwarto & Hartono. 2022. Adoption Innovation Strategy in Organic Farming Innovation Based on Sustainable Extension on Dry Land in Gunungkidul Regency. Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian, 6(2): 21752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman. 2023. Peraturan Bupati (Perbup) Kabupaten Sleman Nomor 91 Tahun 2023 tentang Rencana Aksi Daerah Pangan Dan Gizi Tahun 2023-2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman. 2023. Peraturan Bupati Sleman Nomor 62 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan Pertanian Organik Berbasis Kawasan. Sleman: Bupati Sleman. Tersedia pada: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/272700/perbup-kab-sleman-no-62-tahun-2023 (Diakses: 15 Oktober 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pinuji, S. 2020. Perubahan iklim, pengelolaan lahan berkelanjutan dan tata kelola lahan yang bertanggung jawab. Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan. 6(2): 188-200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Prihandarini, R. 2023. Kapita Selekta Pertanian Organik dan Pertanian Ramah Lingkungan. A-Empat, Banten. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rachmawati, L. 2020. Smart Farming 4.0: Revolusi Digital Pertanian Indonesia di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Inovasi, 20(3): 112–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Reganold, J.P. & Wachter, J.M. (2016). Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nature Plants, 2(2): 15221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Saputro, A. 2021. Pergeseran Penguatan SDM Sektor Pertanian di Era Digital. Jurnal Agrisains, 8(1): 55–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Siahaan, R. Y. K. P. 2022. Pendidikan era revolusi industri 4.0 menuju society 5.0. Pendistra. 5(2): 94-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sihombing, A., N. Dewi, dan Arifudin. 2024. Mitigasi resiko pada aktivitas rantai pasok pupuk organik (studi kasus pada pt. agro subur anugerah). Jurnal Agri Sains. 8(1): 96-107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Suroso, A., Handayani, S., & Raharjo, B. 2021. Kelembagaan dan Kebijakan Daerah dalam Mendukung Pertanian Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pembangunan Daerah Berkelanjutan, 12(3): 177–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tarigan, J. 2020. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pertanian di Era Teknologi Digital. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pertanian, 7(2): 88–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wastutiningsih, S., Suryani, E., dan Purwanto, S. 2022. Smart-Eco Bioproduction: Konsep Pertanian Cerdas Berbasis Ekologi untuk Ketahanan Pangan. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Gadjah Mada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles