Improving Image Quality and Patient Safety in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Lessons from High volume Clinical Practice-2025

Authors

Chioma Jane Okara

Lagoon Hospitals, Lagos State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010184

Subject Category: Public Health

Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 2087-2092

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-30

Accepted: 2026-02-04

Published: 2026-02-13

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in modern medical diagnostics that provides high-resolution, non-invasive visualization of soft tissues, the brain, spine, and musculoskeletal structures. While MRI offers exceptional diagnostic capability, maintaining high image quality and ensuring patient safety remains challenging, especially in high-volume healthcare settings. This review consolidates existing research and applied knowledge with more than ten (10) years of clinical experience to highlight strategies for optimizing MRI performance. However, key areas explored include patient safety protocols, positioning techniques, contrast agent administration, protocol standardization, and equipment calibration. Conversely, emphasis is laid on integrating technical expertise with patient-centered approaches to reduce motion artifacts, prevent adverse outcomes, and improve diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, workflow efficiency and interdisciplinary collaboration are critical components for successful MRI operations in busy hospitals. The present review concludes by providing actionable recommendations for technologists, radiologists, and healthcare institutions to enhance MRI service quality, promote patient safety, and support the effective use of imaging resources.

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI Safety, Image Quality, Patient Positioning, Quality Assurance, Clinical Practice

Downloads

References

1. Bernstein, M. A., King, K. F., & Zhou, X. J. (2017). Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brown, R., Smith, T., & Patel, N. (2018). Workflow optimization in high-volume MRI departments. Journal of Clinical Imaging, 42(3), 150–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Kanal, E., Barkovich, A. J., Bell, C., et al. (2013). ACR guidance document on MR safe practices. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 37(3), 507–515. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kanda, T., Fukusato, T., Matsuda, M., et al. (2016). Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulation in the brain. Radiology, 276(1), 228–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. McRobbie, D. W., Moore, E. A., Graves, M. J., & Prince, M. R. (2021). MRI from Picture to Proton (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Parker, D. L., Roberts, J., & Reddy, R. (2021). MRI quality assurance and workflow efficiency. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 59(4), 567–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Prince, M. R., & Semelka, R. C. (2019). MRI Contrast Agents: Safety and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Reeder, S. B., Fain, S. B., & Brittain, J. H. (2018). Quantitative MRI: Techniques and clinical applications. American Journal of Roentgenology, 211(3), 493–505. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rutala, W. A., & Weber, D. J. (2016). Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities. American Journal of Infection Control, 44(5), e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Shellock, F. G. (2020). MRI safety management and best practices. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 51(3), 667–679. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Shellock, F. G., & Crues, J. V. (2004). MR procedures: Biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology, 232(3), 635–652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles