India’s Regional Strategy for Economic Integration: Policy Lessons from the EU and Asean
Authors
P.G. Department of Political Science, Berhampur University (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000192
Subject Category: International Relations
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 2229-2237
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-29
Accepted: 2026-04-03
Published: 2026-04-14
Abstract
India’s foreign policy has shifted from post-independence non-alignment to a more pragmatic, economically driven, and regionally focused approach, especially after the 1991 economic reforms (Mukherjee & Malone, 2011). Despite its growing global influence, South Asia remains one of the least integrated regions, with India facing challenges such as weak institutions, low intra-regional trade, and inadequate connectivity. While initiatives like SAARC, BIMSTEC, BBIN, and the Act East Policy reflect India’s efforts to promote regional cooperation, progress has been limited compared to successful models like the EU and ASEAN. This paper examines how these regions achieved deeper economic integration and identifies lessons that can help India strengthen its institutional capacity, improve connectivity, harmonize regulations, build resilient regional value chains, and adopt more effective cooperation mechanisms. The study is relevant to India’s current strategic priorities ranging from supply-chain resilience to Indo-Pacific engagement and aims to provide policy recommendations for a more cohesive and forward-looking regional integration strategy.
Keywords
India’s, Regional ,Strategy ,Economic ,Integration
Downloads
References
1. Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Acharya, A. (2012). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Asian Development Bank. (2021). Asian economic integration report 2021: Making digital platforms work for Asia and the Pacific. ADB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Balassa, B. (1961). The theory of economic integration. George Allen & Unwin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2019). Grand theories of integration and the challenges of comparative regionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1231–1252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1622585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chakraborty, D., & Chaisse, J. (2020). India’s trade agreements and the WTO. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chakraborty, D., & Chaisse, J. (2020). The mystery of reciprocal demand for regional trade partnership: Indian experience in RCEP regional value chains. Law and Development Review, 14(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Desai, R. (2020). India’s Act East Policy: Strategic opportunities and challenges. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 7(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Desai, R. M. (2020). India’s rise and the geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific. International Affairs, 96(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gereffi, G. (2018). Global value chains and development: Redefining the contours of 21st century capitalism. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hettne, B. (1999). Globalization and the new regionalism: The second great transformation. Global Governance, 5(3), 347–372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hettne, B. (1999). Globalization and the new regionalism: The second great transformation. In B. Hettne, A. Inotai, & O. Sunkel (Eds.), Globalism and the new regionalism (pp. 1–24). Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the “new” regionalism. New Political Economy, 10(4), 543–571. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2000). The new regionalism in Africa. Global Governance, 6(3), 457–477. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/713687778 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mukherjee, R. (2014). India’s economic transition: The politics of reforms. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Mukherjee, R. (2020). India’s Indo-Pacific strategy: Economic and strategic dimensions. Observer Research Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mukherjee, R., & Malone, D. M. (2011). India’s foreign policy and contemporary security challenges. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Mukherjee, R., & Malone, D. M. (2011). India and China: Conflict and cooperation. Survival, 53(1), 31–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Mukherji, R. (2014). India and global economic governance: From structural conflict to embedded liberalism. International Studies Review, 16(3), 460–466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Global value chains and supply chain resilience. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Palit, A. (2019). India’s disengaging trade policy and its implications for global and regional role. World Trade Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Palit, A. (2019). India’s economic and strategic engagement with the Indo-Pacific. ISEAS Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Pant, H. V. (2022). India and the Indo-Pacific: Strategy, security, and regional cooperation. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: Interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764–782. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Schimmelfennig, F., & Rittberger, B. (2021). The European Union: Power and policy-making. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Sridharan, K. (2017). Regionalism in South Asia: Problems and prospects. Asian Affairs, 48(1), 116–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. World Bank. (2022). World development report 2022: Finance for an equitable recovery. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- China in South Asia and South America: Connections, Intersections and Similarities
- Prospects and Impediments to China-Africa Sports Cooperation in the Contemporary Era
- Decolonising International Relations: African Perspectives on Global Justice - The Case of the Gambia in the International Court of Justice.
- Climate - Induced Displacement and its Implications on Human Security: A Case Study of Ghana
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) in Promoting and Protecting Local Industries in West Africa (2015 – 2024)