Influence of Board of Management Practices on Teacher Discipline in Private Junior Schools in Juja Sub-County, Kenya

Authors

Mudanyi Bonface Agesa

Department of Education Planning and Management, Kibabii University (Kenya)

Dr Manasi Echaune

Department of Education Planning and Management, Kibabii University (Kenya)

Dr Rodgers Cherui

Department of Educational, Daystar University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000013

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 189-201

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-05

Accepted: 2026-07-10

Published: 2026-07-21

Abstract

Teacher discipline is essential for maintaining professionalism, accountability, and effective teaching in schools. This study examined the key factors within Board of Management practices associated with teachers’ discipline in private junior schools in Juja Subcounty, Kiambu County, Kenya. The study was guided by the Systems Theory of Educational Management and adopted a quantitative descriptive survey design. The target population comprised 1,508 respondents from 127 private junior schools, including 127 principals, 1,000 teachers, and 381 Board of Management members. A sample of 228 respondents was selected from 38 schools, comprising 38 principals, 76 teachers, and 114 Board of Management members. A total of 224 respondents participated, producing a response rate of 98.2%. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analysed using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression. The findings showed that participatory decision-making recorded the highest mean score of 3.88, followed by teacher support systems at 3.87 and clear disciplinary guidelines at 3.81. Fair and consistent enforcement recorded the lowest mean score of 3.39, indicating differences in respondents’ perceptions of disciplinary fairness. The regression results indicated a strong positive association between key Board of Management factors and teachers’ discipline, with R = .992, R² = .984, F(1, 222) = 13,427.067, and p < .001. The study concluded that policy clarity, fairness, communication, participatory decision-making, support systems, prompt handling of misconduct, and regular policy review are important in strengthening teachers’ professional conduct. It recommends consistent enforcement of disciplinary policies, transparent communication, regular policy reviews, and greater involvement of teachers and principals in disciplinary decision-making.

Keywords

Board of Management, teacher discipline, private junior schools, disciplinary policies, school governance

Downloads

References

1. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2022). Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220945706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cheng, Y. C. (2022). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Kamau, K., & Mwangi, L. (2019). Transparency and accountability in Board of Management practices and teacher discipline in Juja Subcounty. Journal of Educational Governance, 28(1), 42-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Karacabey, M. F., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Adams, D. (2022). Principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Turkish schools: Examining the mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy and teacher trust. Educational Studies, 48(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1749835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kaukewahulo, S., & Nkengbeza, D. (2023). The school principal and teachers’ roles in improving learners’ academic performance at a selected school in the Karas Region, Namibia. Preschool Education: Global Trends, 3, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-703X-2023-3-83-106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Keshavarz, M., Mirmoghtadaie, Z., & Nayyeri, S. (2022). Design and validation of the virtual classroom management questionnaire. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.5774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lu, X. (2022). School boards and teacher discipline: The decentralized approach in Germany. International Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 82-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Oben, A. I. (2021). Research instruments: A questionnaire and an interview guide used to investigate the implementation of higher education objectives and the attainment of Cameroon’s Vision 2035. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(7), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i7.3808 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Steed, E. A., Shapland, D., & Leech, N. (2022). Early childhood teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of their elementary school’s approach to social emotional learning: A mixed methods study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(7), 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01248-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Williams, J. A., III, Lewis, C., Starker Glass, T., Butler, B. R., & Lim, J. H. (2023). The discipline gatekeeper: Assistant principals’ experiences with managing school discipline in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 58(8), 1543–1571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920908913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles