Influence of Temperature on Mineral Evolution of Cocoa Pod Husk Ash

Authors

B.J. Olawuyi

Dept. of Building Technology, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota & Dept. of Building, School of Environmental Technology, Federal University of Technology, Minna (Nigeria)

C.C. Uzoma

Dept. of Building Technology, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota (Nigeria)

I. O. Omuh

Dept. of Building Technology, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota (Nigeria)

N.B. Iheama

Department of Building, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000035

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 415-426

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-09

Accepted: 2026-08-17

Published: 2026-08-29

Abstract

The transformation of agricultural residues into value-added materials is critical for sustainable development in low-income regions. This study investigates the mineral oxide evolution of Cocoa Pod Husk Ash (CPHA) subjected to thermal treatment at temperatures ranging from 500 °C to 800 °C at 50 oC step intervals. The resulting Cocoa Pod Husk Ash (CPHA) from the thermal treatment were tested using the X-ray fluorescent (XRF) and Fourier Transmission Infra-Red (FTIR) analysis for an examination of the influence of temperature on the oxide composition, physical characteristics, and subsequent application potential. The XRF results revealed CaO as the major oxide in CPHA, having its highest concentrations of 53.4% at 600 oC and 51.03% at 650 oC. The SiO2 content also varied as the burning temperature changes with a peak value of 20.6% at 650 oC. The FTIR indicated varied compound phases as the burning temperature differs with an inference that the 600 - 650 oC temperature is the best for good amorphous properties and that CPHA will be better used in conjunction with another reactive Pozzolan of high SiO2 content for good performance as a supplementary cementitious material.

Keywords

Cocoa pod husk ash, calcination, mineral oxides, pozzolanic materials, sustainable construction.

Downloads

References

1. ASTM International (2022). ASTM C618: Specification Standards for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. Retrieved from www.astm.org. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Audu, V.E.M. and Mamman, Y.W. (2013). Use of Cocoa Pod Husk Ash as Admixture in Concrete, International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), 2 (11), ISSN: 2278-0181; https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV2IS110716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Awoyera, P. O. and Ugwu, E. I. (2022). Overview on environmental impact of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating pozzolans or fillers. In The Structural Integrity of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Produced with Fillers and Pozzolans (pp. 435-444). Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balador, Z. (2024). Agricultural by-products as construction materials. In Sustainability and toxicity of building materials (pp. 263-287). Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bowan P. A. and Limann H. (2022) Cocoa Pod Husk Ash as Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete Production. Communication in applied science. Volume 10 (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowan, P.A. (2021). Cocoa Pod Husk Ash as Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete Production, Communications in Applied Sciences, Infinity Press, 10 (1), ISSN 2201-7372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. British Standards Institution (2011). BS EN 197-1- Cement. Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements, Part 1. BSI, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mael, S.H. (2024) Cocoa Pod Husk Meal as a Feed Ingredient for Livestock, https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nandiyanto, A.B.D., Oktiani, R. and Ragadhita, R. (2019). How to Read and Interpret FTIR Spectroscope of Organic Material, Indonesia Journal of Science & Technology, 4 (1), 97-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nduka, D.O., Olawuyi, B.J., Fagbenle, O.I. and Fonteboa, B.G. (2022); “Assessment of the Durability Dynamics of High-Performance Concrete Blended with a Fibrous Rice Husk Ash”, Crystals, 12(1), 75; MPDI Publishing, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12010075. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Neville, A.M. (2012). Properties of Concrete (Fifth Ed.), Trans-Atlantic Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Olawuyi, B.J., Joshua, O., Hassan, I.O., Enejiyon, M.O. and Egwuda, C.I. (2017). Exploratory Study on Agro-waste Ashes Combination with Industrial Waste as Alternative Binders in Concrete, Paper presented at 2017 Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI) International Conference on Emerging Materials & Technologies for Sustainable Building and Road Infrastructure, NAF Conference Centre, Abuja on 22nd – 24th June. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Olawuyi, B.J., Saka, R.O., Nduka, D.O. and Babafemi, A.J. (2019). “Comparative Study of Superabsorbent Polymers and Pre-soaked Pumice as Internal Curing Agent in Rice Husk Ash Based High-performance Concrete”, 3rd International Conference on Application of Superabsorbent Polymers and other New Admixtures towards Smart Cities, Skukuza, Kruger National Park, South Africa, 25th – 27th Nov. Published in RILEM Book Series 2020 (Chapter 9) by SpringerLinks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Oyebisi, S., Igba, T., and Oniyide, D. (2019). Performance evaluation of cashew nutshell ash as a binder in concrete production. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 11, e00293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Parlato, M. C. M., Valenti, F., Guerrini, L., Perbellini, A., and Pezzuolo, A. (2025). From agricultural by-products to building materials: A spatial modelling approach to foster green construction sector. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 100307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sarangi, S. and Suganya, O. M. (2024). A comprehensive review of the physical and mechanical characteristics of agricultural by-products as cementitious alternatives in the production of sustainable concrete. Materials Today Sustainability, 27, 100882. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kumar, R., and Kapur, A., (2025), Sustainable building materials: a pathway to sustainable development. Journal of civil Engineering 23(5):172-187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles