Innovative Indigenous Brooding Strategies for Philippine Native Chickens: Effects of Local Alternative Heat Sources and Litter Floor Types on Productivity and Welfare
Authors
College of Agriculture Systems and Technology Pampanga State Agricultural University (Philippines)
College of Agriculture Systems and Technology Pampanga State Agricultural University (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800345
Subject Category: Agriculture
Volume/Issue: 12/9 | Page No: 3852-3868
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-24
Accepted: 2025-09-29
Published: 2025-10-14
Abstract
Native chicken production offers a promising source of income for rural communities, especially in remote areas. However, natural brooding limits egg production per hen, making artificial brooding necessary. In mountainous regions without electricity, artificial brooding poses challenges. This study aimed to evaluate indigenous brooding strategies for Philippine native chickens, focusing on environmental conditions, growth performance, survival rate, and chick welfare.
A split-plot experiment using 252 chicks was conducted under a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). The main factor was heating source—Tukong, Adjustable Hanging Heated Charcoal (AHHC), and Kerosene Lamp—tested across three litter floor types: White Wood Shavings, Rice Straw, and Rice Hull. AHHC consistently produced the highest temperature, lowest humidity (p<.01), and lowest litter moisture content (p<.01). AHHC with White Wood Shavings yielded optimal feeding, highest weight gain, and best feed conversion. This combination also showed the highest survival rate and thermal comfort, with no signs of huddling or panting. Mild hock burns and minimal breast and leg soiling were observed. Overall, chick viability post-brooding was highest under AHHC with White Wood Shavings, resulting in the best return on investment (ROI).
Keywords
indigenous heating contrivance, ambient, quality of life, thermal comfort
Downloads
References
1. Marshall K. Management: Keeping the litter dry to make a profit. WORLD POULTRY 30 2014 72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Gillespie J R, Flanders F B. Modern Livestock and Poultry Production. 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Welfare Quality®. Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Poultry (broilers, laying hens). Welfare Quality® Consortium 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Lambio A.L. Breeding and management of breeder chickens. Poultry Production in the Tropics, 2010: 4(4.61.3):72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Abreu V, Abreu P de, Jaenisch F, Coldebella A, Paiva D de. Effect of floor type (dirt or concrete) on litter quality, house environmental conditions, and performance of broilers. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 2011; 13: 127–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Carey J.B, Lacey R.E, Mukhtar S. 2004. 1. A review of literature concerning odors, ammonia, and dust from broiler facilities: 2. Flock and House Management Factors. J Appl Poult Res 2004; 509–513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bernardo F.A.E.M, Luis E.S. 2010. Broiler production. litter management during the brooding period. In: Poultry Production in the Tropics. 2010: 6: 108-109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kumar P. Best Practices for Maintaining Litter Quality in Poultry Farms - Agriculture Notes by Agriculture. 2023 https://agriculture.institute/poultry-housing-and-management/best-practices-litter-quality-poultry-farms/ (24 September 2025, date last accessed). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bock BB, Swagemaker P, Lever J, Montanari C, Ferrari P. Farmers’ experiences of the farm assessment: Interviews with farmers (B.B. Bock and I. de Jong, Ed.). The Assessment of Animal Welfare on Broiler Farm. 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. de Roma V.M. C, Alo A.M. P, Belen E.H, Villar E.C., Lambio A.L. Improved Management of Philippine Native Chickens. PCARRD Farm Primer No. 19 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ritz C. W, Fairchild B. D., Lacey M. P. Litter Quality and Broiler Performance. Univesity of Georgia 2009 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Oro CS, Souza FE De, Rodrigues WC, Oro JS, Milbradt EL, Guirro ECBP. Relationship of Thermal Regulation Capacity of Chicks with Breeder age, Breed and Incubator type. Int J Poult Sci 2019; 18: 538–543. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
- Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
- Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
- The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District