Integrated Electronic Health Records in Dentistry: A Seven‑Year Experience with Epic Wisdom and its Impact on Comprehensive Patient Care

Authors

Dr. Aparnaa Upadhyaya, DDS, MPA, BDS

University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN,; Erlanger Community Health Center, Chattanooga, TN (USA)

Dr. Jacqueline Brown, DDS

University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN,; Erlanger Community Health Center, Chattanooga, TN (USA)

MaryGrace Hilario RDA

University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN,;Erlanger Community Health Center, Chattanooga, TN (USA)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1304000222

Subject Category: Health

Volume/Issue: 13/4 | Page No: 2590-2596

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-27

Accepted: 2026-05-02

Published: 2026-05-16

Abstract

Background: Historically, dental and medical records have existed in separate systems, limiting the ability of providers to access comprehensive patient information¹⁻³. Prior to 2017, our dental clinic relied on standalone paper charts and patient‑completed intake forms for medical histories, medications, and allergies⁴. This fragmented workflow created clinical blind spots and increased the risk of incomplete or inaccurate information¹⁻⁵.
Objective: To evaluate how the implementation of Epic Wisdom, an integrated electronic health record (EHR) system, improved patient safety⁵⁻⁷, care coordination⁸⁻¹⁰, and clinical decision‑making³,¹¹ by unifying medical and dental data into a single longitudinal chart⁹,¹².
Methods: This original research study uses a mixed‑methods design combining retrospective workflow analysis, clinical case review, and provider‑reported outcomes¹¹. Data were collected from 2015–2024, comparing pre‑integration (paper‑based) and post‑integration (Epic Wisdom) periods⁴.
Results: Integration of Epic Wisdom resulted in (1) 100% real‑time access to medical histories, medications, allergies, and laboratory values⁹,¹²; (2) a significant reduction in medical history discrepancies⁴; (3) a major decrease in delayed or cancelled dental procedures due to missing medical information⁵,⁷; and (4) improved interdisciplinary communication through shared charting and messaging⁸⁻¹⁰. A representative case demonstrates how integrated EHR access altered treatment planning, prevented complications, and enabled targeted care⁵,¹¹.
Conclusion: Integrated EHR systems significantly enhance dental care quality by improving diagnostic accuracy³,¹¹, reducing risk⁵⁻⁷, and enabling personalized, medically informed treatment planning⁹,¹². Epic Wisdom transformed our clinic’s workflow from isolated paper charts to a unified, data‑driven care model that supports comprehensive oral–systemic health management³,⁸.

Keywords

Integrated Electronic Health Records, Epic Wisdom, Medical–Dental Integration, Dental Informatics, Patient Safety, Care Coordination, Inter-professional Collaboration

Downloads

References

1. Bates DW, Singh H. Two decades since To Err Is Human: Progress and priorities. Health Affairs. 2018;37(11):1736‑1743. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press; 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Schleyer T, Spallek H. Dental informatics and practice transformation. J Dent Res. 2019;98(12):1335‑1342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kalenderian E, et al. Achieving meaningful use of EHRs in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(12):948‑956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Walji MF, et al. Improving dental patient safety through EHR integration. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(2):292‑298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Acharya A, et al. Integration of medical and dental care in EHRs. J Dent Educ. 2017;81(9):1103‑1110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Weiner JP, et al. Paper-based vs. electronic medical records: A systematic comparison. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(3):205‑213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. O’Malley AS, et al. Provider-to-provider communication in integrated systems. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):381‑389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Adler‑Milstein J, et al. EHR interoperability and clinical outcomes. Health Serv Res. 2017;52(3):1187‑1208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Slight SP, et al. Medication safety and clinical decision support. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(9):725‑733. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for EHR safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(Suppl 3):i68‑i74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Classen DC, et al. Adverse events in outpatient care. J Patient Saf. 2018;14(3):e45‑e52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error as a leading cause of death. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Schiff GD, et al. Diagnostic errors and information gaps. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(3):402‑404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Epic Systems Corporation. Epic Wisdom Dental Module Overview. Epic; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Friedman CP, et al. Toward learning health systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(1):43‑50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of EHR systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47‑55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wright A, et al. Clinical decision support and patient safety. JAMA. 2017;317(22):2273‑2274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Singh H, et al. Case-based analysis of EHR-related safety events. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(10):840‑848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Health Resources and Services Administration. FQHC Program Overview. HRSA; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Formicola AJ, et al. Dental education in community-based settings. J Dent Educ. 2012;76(1):98‑109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mertz EA, et al. Training dental students in underserved settings. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(12):2181‑2187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vest JR, Kash BA. Organizational readiness for health IT. J Med Syst. 2016;40(6):1‑10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. McCarthy DM, et al. Interprofessional communication in integrated care. Acad Med. 2018;93(10):1500‑1506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S1‑S200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Douketis JD, et al. Perioperative management of anticoagulation. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e326S‑e350S. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Fihn SD, et al. Evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2012;126(25):e354‑e471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. KDIGO. Clinical practice guideline for chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):1‑150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kripalani S, et al. Hospital discharge communication failures. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):314‑323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology. Guidelines for endocrine disorders. Endocr Pract. 2022;28(1):1‑120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Bates DW, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29‑34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human. National Academies Press; 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Fleisher LA, et al. ACC/AHA perioperative cardiovascular evaluation guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130(24):e278‑e333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Naughton CA. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(6):743‑750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ammenwerth E, et al. Patient portals and engagement outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles