Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Plant Electrophysiology for Early Stress Diagnosis: A Scoping Review
Authors
Department of Computer and Data Science, NSBM Green University (Sri Lanka)
Department of Computer and Data Science, NSBM Green University (Sri Lanka)
Department of Software Engineering and Computer Security, NSBM Green University (Sri Lanka)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1213CS0016
Subject Category: Computer Science
Volume/Issue: 12/13 | Page No: 194-201
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-19
Accepted: 2025-12-26
Published: 2026-01-03
Abstract
This scoping review explores the ways in which plants respond on a constant basis to environmental and biological stresses like drought, nutrient deficiencies, heat, salinity, and pathogen attacks through their internal bioelectric processes. Electrophysiology is used to analyse plant internal bioelectrical processes, enabling direct measurement and delivering faster, more precise, and cost-effective diagnostic information compared to conventional methods. However, these processes have not been properly explored for the diagnosis of stress faced by plants until recent advances that used artificial intelligence. This book review compiles results of the 16 peer-reviewed studies carried out over the years, focusing on the integration of electrophysiological signal measurement and machine learning, deep learning, regression, and ensemble learning approaches like XGBoost, Random Forest, convolutional neural network(CNN), and long short-term memory(LSTM).The Studies involved several types of plants, including tomatoes, wheat, grapevine, soybeans, and peppers, grown both under controlled and field conditions. The results show that artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches can accurately identify drought, nitrogen, heat, salinity, and pathogen stresses using the time-series electrophysiological signal of plants. Some studies have also shown the increasing use of wearable plant biosensors and real-time electrome monitoring systems. Despite the progress, several gaps remain. Most of the literature on the topic is based on small datasets, have experimental variability, and use non-standardized signal processing pipelines. This limits their use on a large scale. Noise sensitivity, the lack of open electrophysiology datasets, and model generalizability across species are among the challenges. Future studies should emphasize the following: the creation of universal bio signal databases, multi-species validation, the design of biosensor systems using the Internet of Things, and the development of Explainable AI models. Among the various applications of biosensors, plant electrophysiology using AI holds enormous potential for the efficient early diagnosis of stress patterns using biosensors.
Keywords
Plant Electrophysiology; Bioelectrical signals; Artificial Intelligence; Precision Agriculture; Machine Learning
Downloads
References
1. M. Cattani, Water Status Assessment in Grapevines Using Plant Electrophysiology. Nyon, Switzerland: Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0), Nov. 4, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. N. Bhadra, S. K. Chatterjee, and S. Das, Measurement and Classification of Electrical Signals from Plant Electrophysiology Data. Nadia, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, May 4, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. M. Stolarz, Integration of Plant Electrophysiology and Time-Lapse Video Analysis via Artificial Intelligence for the Advancement of Precision Agriculture. Lublin, Poland, Jun. 18, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. E. Najdenovska, F. D. T., C. P., N. W., C. C., and L. E. R., “Classification of plant electrophysiology signals for detection of spider mites infestation in tomatoes,” Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland, Feb. 4, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. E. Kozlova, E. S., and V. S., “Analysis of electrome as a tool for plant monitoring: Progress and perspectives,” Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, May 16, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. P. A. Gloor, Plant Bioelectrical Signals for Environmental and Emotional State Classification. Cologne, Germany, Nov. 5, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. H. Li, N. F., L. H. J., and Q. Wang, “Early detection of dark-affected plant mechanical responses using enhanced electrical signals,” Jinzhong, Shanxi, China, Mar. 26, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. G. Niemeyer-Reissig, T. Á., and G., “Machine learning for automatic classification of tomato ripening stages using electrophysiological recordings,” Pelotas, Brazil, Oct. 28, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. H. U. R. Siddiqui et al., “Classifying plant electrical signals in response to external stimuli using machine learning for enhanced agricultural sustainability,” Taylor & Francis Group, Informa UK Ltd., Sep. 23, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. L. de C. Garcia, Using Machine Learning Techniques to Identify Human Movement through Biosensors Embedded in Plants. Madrid, Spain, Jan. 24, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. F. Gil, M. W., and P. A. G., “Can plants perceive human gestures? Using AI to track eurythmic human–plant interaction,” Basel, Switzerland, May 12, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. E. Najdenovska, F. D. T., C. P., N. W., C. C., and L. E. R., “Classification of plant electrophysiology signals for detection of spider mites infestation in tomatoes,” Basel, Switzerland, Feb. 4, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. S. Zhang, X. D., B. Z., Y. Wang, X. Yu, X. Hu, and C. Wu, “Impedance-driven decoupling of water–nitrogen stress in wheat: A parallel machine learning framework leveraging leaf electrophysiology,” Basel, Switzerland, Jul. 1, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. D. González i Juclà, E. Najdenovska, F. D. T., and L. E. R., “Detecting stress caused by nitrogen deficit using deep learning techniques applied on plant electrophysiological data,” Jun. 14, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. M. Kumar and S. D. K., “Decoding the physiological response of plants to stress using deep learning for forecasting crop loss due to abiotic, biotic, and climatic variables,” Agra, India, May 26, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. E. Buss and H. H., When Plants Respond: Electrophysiology and Machine Learning for Green Monitoring Systems. Konstanz, Germany, Jun. 30, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
- Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
- Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
- Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
- Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet