Internet Usage among Senior Secondary School Students: A Study of Locality and Institutional Differences

Inequalities in digital access and engagement continue to shape educational opportunities within secondary schooling contexts. This study examines variations in internet usage among senior secondary school students by analysing differences across locality (rural-urban) and institutional type (government-private). Grounded in the digital divide framework, the research explores how structural and contextual factors influence patterns of online engagement among adolescents. A descriptive survey method was adopted, and data were collected from 304 senior secondary school students using the Internet Usage Scale developed by Saini and Kaur (2017). The instrument demonstrated acceptable internal consistency as indicated by Cronbach’s alpha. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics to determine overall usage trends and independent samples t-tests to assess group-based differences. The results indicate that internet usage is not uniformly distributed across educational contexts. Urban students reported significantly higher engagement levels compared to rural students, reflecting infrastructural and resource-based disparities. Similarly, students enrolled in private institutions exhibited greater usage intensity than those in government schools, suggesting institutional differences in digital exposure and support systems. These findings suggest that digital inequality in school education is multidimensional, shaped by geographic and institutional conditions rather than individual factors alone. The study contributes to ongoing debates on educational equity by emphasizing the need for context-sensitive digital policies that address structural gaps in access, quality of connectivity, and digital learning environments.

Digital Divide; Internet Inequality; Locality

1. Anderson, M., & Perrin, A. (2018). Nearly one-in-five teens can’t always finish their homework because of the digital divide. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389751 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2019). The common-sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. Common Sense Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wei, K. K., Teo, H. H., Chan, H. C., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170-187. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study