Inventory Management in Private Merchandising Business: Bridging Identified Gaps Through Cost-Efficiency Framework

Authors

Glenn G. Accad, Ph.D.

Graduate School of Business Management, Philippine Christian University, Navotas, NCR, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000173

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 3029-3034

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-26

Accepted: 2026-08-31

Published: 2026-09-12

Abstract

This study examined inventory management practices in a private hard-discount merchandising business and developed an integrated framework for improving operational efficiency and cost efficiency. A mixed-methods design combined a structured employee survey with qualitative accounts of inventory and supply-chain practices. Quantitative analysis assessed real-time data and tracking, predictive modeling for demand forecasting, and sustainability and cost reduction, while qualitative thematic analysis examined waste reduction, continuous improvement, demand-pull practices, and supplier integration. The reported results show consistently high assessments of the three data-driven inventory dimensions. Predictive modeling was the strongest reported predictor of inventory management performance, followed by sustainability and cost reduction and real-time data and tracking. Qualitative findings indicate that waste reduction and continuous improvement were practiced but remained largely manual and reactive, while supplier coordination was often informal and vulnerable to delays. The study proposes an Integrated Smart Inventory Management Framework that combines data-driven inventory optimization with lean supply-chain practices to support proactive replenishment, waste reduction, supplier coordination, and long-term cost efficiency.

Keywords

Inventory Management; Demand Forecasting; Real-Time Tracking; Lean Supply Chain

Downloads

References

1. Adelman, S., et al. (2024). Work cited in the source manuscript on cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Birkmaier, M., et al. (2024). Work cited in the source manuscript on inventory planning in perishable supply chains. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ekins, P. (2021). Work cited in the source manuscript on the economics of low-carbon and resource-efficient transition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hotte, K. (2023). Work cited in the source manuscript on demand-pull and technology-push dynamics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hou, J. (2023). Work cited in the source manuscript on supplier integration and encroachment risk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kumar, et al. (2020). Work cited in the source manuscript on predictive modeling and inventory optimization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Palanki. (2023). Work cited in the source manuscript on the Data-Driven Inventory Optimization Framework. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Scotti, F. (2023). Retail demand forecasting: A comparative study for multivariate time series. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Shukla, M., & Jharkharia, S. (2021). Big data analytics in inventory and supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(5), 1572–1595. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Singh, A., & Verma, R. (2022). Automation and integration in supply chain: Improving inventory efficiency through digital tools. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, 108445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Wang, et al. (2021). Work cited in the source manuscript on lean supply-chain practices. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Zhang, J., Li, J., & Fan, Z. (2024). Lean and green integration in supply chains: Effects on operational and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 136754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles