JelajahOptik: Bridging Gaps in Rural Science Learning with Affordable Innovation

Authors

Wan Alya Maisarah Wan Abdullah

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Yuhanis Mhd Bakri

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1210000112

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 12/10 | Page No: 1289-1293

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-06

Accepted: 2025-10-14

Published: 2025-11-06

Abstract

This paper presents the development and usability analysis of the “JelajahOptik” model, a low-cost and practical teaching aid designed for lower secondary Science in rural schools. The model was developed based on the ADDIE instructional design framework to address educational gaps caused by limited laboratory access and technological constraints in rural schools in Malaysia. The study involved 108 lower secondary students from Kuala Krai, Kelantan, and assessed usability in terms of usefulness and satisfaction. Findings indicated high validity, CVI (face validity = 0.80, content validity = 0.93) and reliability of survey with Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.86. Descriptive analysis using SPSS revealed high mean scores for usability constructs, usefulness (M=3.81, SD=0.20) and satisfaction (M=3.80, SD=0.25). The “JelajahOptik” model demonstrates strong potential for national-scale implementation and commercialization as a cost-effective, eco-friendly, and inclusive science education tool.

Keywords

Low-Cost Teaching Aid, Rural Schools, Science, Optics, ADDIE Model

Downloads

References

1. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Norfarahzatul Asikin Zakari, M., Zuber Abd. Majid, & Muhammad Hussin. (2022). Keciciran murid sekolah di Malaysia: Suatu pemerhatian awal. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(2), e001288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Zainol, F. (2024, October 7). Mahu murid luar bandar minat sains, teknologi. Kosmo. Retrieved from https://www.kosmo.com.my/2024/10/07/mahu-murid-luar-bandar-minat-sains-teknologi/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Joni, M. (2019, May 27). Jangan abaikan sekolah pedalaman. Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/pendidikan/2019/05/568472/jangan-abaikan-sekolah-pedalaman [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adipraja, I., Aisyah, N., Pujiastuti, R., & Permana, D. (2024). Implementing a rainwater harvesting system: A sustainability-focused STEM activity for prospective science teachers. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 20(2), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Maslamany, K., Chua, K. H., & Sathasivam, R. (2024). Self-efficacy, attitudes, knowledge, and school support as predictors of STEM teachers' pedagogical approach to sustainable development. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nor Kamilah Mukhtar, & Nur Aqilah Aminorhuddin. (2024). Integrating sustainability and innovation through recycled materials in science education. International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage, 12(1), 116–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Juliatto, C., Silva, L. M., Oliveira, F. R., & Santos, T. P. (2024). Low-cost experiments for teaching electrostatics in Brazilian high schools. Physics Education, 59(2), 1361–6552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gita Ayu Wandari, A. F. C., & Rika Rafikah Agustin. (2018). The effect of STEAM-based learning on students’ concept mastery and creativity in learning light and optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 26–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ahmad Tarmizi Abu, R., Rabiatul Adawiah Ahmad Rashyid, & Salmiza. (2020). Pembinaan modul pengajaran al-Quran (al-Alaq) dengan menggunakan model instruksional ADDIE. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hanifah Mahat, S. A. M. N., Saiyidina Balkhis Norkhidi, & Nur Hidayah Baharuddin. (2013). Construct validity of the knowledge and skills in a geography STEM education instrument among prospective teachers: Confirmatory factor analysis. Indonesia Journal of Geografi, 53(3), 424–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Riduwan, M. B. A. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian (Edisi 2). Bandung: Alfabeta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles