JelajahOptik: Bridging Gaps in Rural Science Learning with Affordable Innovation
Authors
Wan Alya Maisarah Wan Abdullah
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1210000112
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 12/10 | Page No: 1289-1293
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-06
Accepted: 2025-10-14
Published: 2025-11-06
Abstract
This paper presents the development and usability analysis of the “JelajahOptik” model, a low-cost and practical teaching aid designed for lower secondary Science in rural schools. The model was developed based on the ADDIE instructional design framework to address educational gaps caused by limited laboratory access and technological constraints in rural schools in Malaysia. The study involved 108 lower secondary students from Kuala Krai, Kelantan, and assessed usability in terms of usefulness and satisfaction. Findings indicated high validity, CVI (face validity = 0.80, content validity = 0.93) and reliability of survey with Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.86. Descriptive analysis using SPSS revealed high mean scores for usability constructs, usefulness (M=3.81, SD=0.20) and satisfaction (M=3.80, SD=0.25). The “JelajahOptik” model demonstrates strong potential for national-scale implementation and commercialization as a cost-effective, eco-friendly, and inclusive science education tool.
Keywords
Low-Cost Teaching Aid, Rural Schools, Science, Optics, ADDIE Model
Downloads
References
1. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Norfarahzatul Asikin Zakari, M., Zuber Abd. Majid, & Muhammad Hussin. (2022). Keciciran murid sekolah di Malaysia: Suatu pemerhatian awal. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(2), e001288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Zainol, F. (2024, October 7). Mahu murid luar bandar minat sains, teknologi. Kosmo. Retrieved from https://www.kosmo.com.my/2024/10/07/mahu-murid-luar-bandar-minat-sains-teknologi/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Joni, M. (2019, May 27). Jangan abaikan sekolah pedalaman. Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/pendidikan/2019/05/568472/jangan-abaikan-sekolah-pedalaman [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Adipraja, I., Aisyah, N., Pujiastuti, R., & Permana, D. (2024). Implementing a rainwater harvesting system: A sustainability-focused STEM activity for prospective science teachers. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 20(2), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Maslamany, K., Chua, K. H., & Sathasivam, R. (2024). Self-efficacy, attitudes, knowledge, and school support as predictors of STEM teachers' pedagogical approach to sustainable development. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Nor Kamilah Mukhtar, & Nur Aqilah Aminorhuddin. (2024). Integrating sustainability and innovation through recycled materials in science education. International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage, 12(1), 116–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Juliatto, C., Silva, L. M., Oliveira, F. R., & Santos, T. P. (2024). Low-cost experiments for teaching electrostatics in Brazilian high schools. Physics Education, 59(2), 1361–6552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gita Ayu Wandari, A. F. C., & Rika Rafikah Agustin. (2018). The effect of STEAM-based learning on students’ concept mastery and creativity in learning light and optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 26–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ahmad Tarmizi Abu, R., Rabiatul Adawiah Ahmad Rashyid, & Salmiza. (2020). Pembinaan modul pengajaran al-Quran (al-Alaq) dengan menggunakan model instruksional ADDIE. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hanifah Mahat, S. A. M. N., Saiyidina Balkhis Norkhidi, & Nur Hidayah Baharuddin. (2013). Construct validity of the knowledge and skills in a geography STEM education instrument among prospective teachers: Confirmatory factor analysis. Indonesia Journal of Geografi, 53(3), 424–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Riduwan, M. B. A. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian (Edisi 2). Bandung: Alfabeta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study