Judicial Interpretation of Section 167 of the CrPC, Rights of Detainee and Police Procedure in Bangladesh

This research critically examines the legal framework and judicial application of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 in Bangladesh focusing on the delicate balance between effective criminal investigation and the constitutional guarantees of personal liberty and due process. Although Section 167 was designed to ensure judicial oversight in cases where investigations cannot be completed within twenty-four hours, its frequent misuse has raised concerns regarding arbitrary detention, custodial torture and prolonged pre-trial incarceration.Using a doctrinal and critical analytical methodology, the study evaluates statutory provisions, constitutional safeguards under Articles 31, 32, 33, and 35 and key judicial pronouncements shaping the modern interpretation of pre-trial detention. The findings reveal systemic inconsistencies in police procedure, gaps in judicial scrutiny and structural barriers that undermine detainee rights. The research argues for a rightscentric reform of Section 167, proposing stronger judicial monitoring, stricter standards for remand and enhanced safeguards against custodial abuse. Overall, the study seeks to contribute to ongoing debates on criminal justice reform in Bangladesh by emphasizing the need for a more transparent, accountable and constitutionally compliant remand system.

The Code of Criminal Procedure. Bangladesh Legal Aid

1. Primary Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Case Laws [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bangladesh and others v. BLAST and others (2016) 8 SCOB (AD) 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bangladesh v BLAST (2017) 69 DLR (AD) 63, 143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. BLAST v Bangladesh (2003) 55 DLR 363, 369. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Government of Bangladesh and Others v. Mahmudur Rahman and Another (2016) 24 BLT (AD) 438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Government of Bangladesh v. Shah Alam (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Major (Retd) M. Khairuzzaman v. The State (6 BLT (HCD) 130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Saifuzzaman v State (2004) 56 DLR 324, 333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Statutes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. The Code of Criminal Procedure,1898. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. The Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh,1972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Secondary Sources Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ali Akkas, Sarkar, Law of Criminal procedure (first published 2006, Bijoy Law Book House) 141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Haque, Zahirul ,Code of Criminal Procedure (first Published 2011, Bangladesh Law Book Co.) 354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ridwanul Hoque, Judicial Activism in Bangladesh: A Golden Mean Approach (first published 2011, Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2011). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Journal Article [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted on 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171 (ICCPR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Muhammad Ekramul Haque, ‘Remand and the Right to Liberty: A Critical Analysis of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure’ (2012) 23 Dhaka University Law Journal 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shahdeen Malik, ‘Due Process and the Limits of Judicial Activism in Bangladesh’ (2003) 15 Dhaka University Studies Journal 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Website [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. <https://blog.ipleaders.in/judicial-custody-vs-police-custody/> accessed 7 September 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/06/bangladesh-end-impunity-for-torture-and-upholdvictims-right-to-reparation/> accessed 14 October 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. <https://www.askbd.org> accessed 5 September 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.