Knowledge and Attitude of Men at Reproductive Age Towards Permanent Family Planning Method
Authors
Semester B. Sc Nursing students, KMCT College Of Nursing, Manassery, Kozhikode (India)
Semester B. Sc Nursing students, KMCT College Of Nursing, Manassery, Kozhikode (India)
Semester B. Sc Nursing students, KMCT College Of Nursing, Manassery, Kozhikode (India)
Semester B. Sc Nursing students, KMCT College Of Nursing, Manassery, Kozhikode (India)
Semester B. Sc Nursing students, KMCT College Of Nursing, Manassery, Kozhikode (India)
Associate Professor, Department of Community Health Nursing, KMCT College Of Nursing, Manassery, Kozhikode (India)
Professor, Department of Mental Health Nursing, KMCT College Of Nursing, Manassery (India)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-28
Accepted: 2026-02-02
Published: 2026-02-17
Abstract
Family planning refers to a conscious effort by couples to limit or space their children through contraceptive methods. It addresses maternal reproductive health by promoting adequate birth spacing, preventing unwanted pregnancies and abortions, reducing sexually transmitted infections, and enhancing the quality of life for mothers, fetuses, and families overall.
This study assessed knowledge of and attitudes toward permanent family planning methods among men of reproductive age. Specific objectives included evaluating knowledge levels, attitude levels, and associations between demographic factors and these variables. The conceptual framework drew on the Health Belief Model, with data collected via a sociodemographic proforma, a semi-structured knowledge questionnaire, and a Likert attitude scale.
Keywords
Knowledge, attitude, permanent family planning method, men at reproductive age
Downloads
References
1. Thel H, Latour CD, Tsevat D, Dissanayake MV, Wood ME, Arora KS. Prevalence of male and female permanent contraception and long-acting reversible contraceptives among a commercially insured population in the United States, 2010 to 2022. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.XX.XXX. PubMed PMID: 40254277. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40254277/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Herkommer K, Jahnen M, Rechberger A, Schiele S. Vasectomy: prevalence and sex life. J Sex Med. 2023;20(Suppl 4):qdad062.032. doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdad062.032. https://academic.oup.com/jsm/article/20/Supplement_4/qdad062.032/7220187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Abebe Wondyfraw A, Assefa Kassaw N. Magnitude of long-acting and permanent family planning practice and its factors among contraceptive users: a cross-sectional study. J Surg Care. [Year];Volume:[pages]. https://www.opastpublishers.com/peer-review/magnitude-of-longacting-and-permanent-family-planning-practice-and-its-factors-among-contraceptive-users-a-crosssectiona-4099.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Oliveira AV, Sampaio ALN, Mascarenhas Júnior RW. Temporal trend of vasectomies in Brazil and its regions by age group and race/skin color: a temporal analysis from 2013 to 2022. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025;34:e20240209. doi:10.1590/S2237-96222024v34e20240209.en. PMID: 40366945; PMCID: PMC12077542. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12077542/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Akter S, Khan MMH, Hossain AH MK, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with the use of long-acting reversible and permanent contraceptive methods among women who desire no more children in Bangladesh. Contracept Reprod Med. 2025;10:32. doi:10.1186/s40834-024-00331-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40301957/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Zhang X, Eisenberg ML. Vasectomy utilization in men aged 18–45 declined between 2002 and 2017: results from the United States National Survey for Family Growth data. Andrology. 2021;10(1):137–142. doi:10.1111/andr.13093. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34390207/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Huang Z, Hyman MJ, Raheem OA. Trends in the vasectomy rate among privately insured men aged 18–64 in the United States between 2014 and 2021. Urology. 2023;179:80–86. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.013. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37353084/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Sharma V, Sharma S, Sharma A, et al. Unraveling factors shaping the acceptance and non-acceptance of non-scalpel vasectomy in rural Central India: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e53311. doi:10.7759/cureus.53311. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38435918/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Canning D, Karra M. Unwanted family planning: prevalence estimates for 56 countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2023;54(1):75–93. doi:10.1111/sifp.12230. PMID: 36705943. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36705943/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Pierson BC, Banaag A, Janvrin ML, et al. Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade. Int J Impot Res. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41443-024-00905-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38762601/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Knowledge and Attitude of Undergraduate Nursing Students towards Organ Donation
- Cold Hip Bath Therapy for Labor Pain Management: A Review of Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Women's Health
- Work Settings Utilizing the S.C.O.R.E Model on the Psychological Empowerment of Hospital Nurses in Cebu City
- An Assessment on the Quality of Life of PLHIV Residents in Digos City Barangays: Basis for Health Teaching Program
- Work-Related Stress and Its Psychodermatological Impact on Nursing Professionals