Language Perceptions: A Prediction Clue of Bukavu Linguistic Situation and Its Impact on the Town Socioeconomic Development

This paper explores the language perceptions and attitudes as perceived by the population of Bukavu town in the Democratic Republic of Congo and the impact of such perceptions on language vitality and on the town socioeconomic development. The purpose is to reflect on the present and future linguistic situation of the town and relate the shown perceptions and attitudes to the town socioeconomic development. A questionnaire was addressed to 1,266 people selected from the three Bukavu communes. The results indicate, on one hand, growing negative attitudes towards local languages and Kiswahili (the regional language) and growing positive attitudes towards French and English. This is a good indication that even though Kiswahili is still the commonly used language in the town today, it is also already in a state of vulnerability considering its users perceptions and attitudes. Such vulnerability and endangerment go also for all other local languages; Mashi, Kirega, Kifuliru, Kihavu, Kitembo. This negatively impacts on the town socioeconomic in the sense that there is a very low involvement rate of the people into informal innovative and creative sectors despite the very high unemployment rate in the formal sector. On the other hand, French and English are in a safety state in Bukavu which implies a very promising future. This is a good indication of Bukavu openness to international economic transactions which positively contribute to the town socioeconomic development. The study limited to one town (Bukavu) and its surroundings. For the reliability purpose, it should be replicated to include the whole country to check if the situation can be applied to the whole country.

Bukavu, language perceptions, language attitudes, language vitality, socioeconomic development.

1. Bambi B. S. (Eds) (1998). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bernard Spolsky (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death. CUP [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dulce , Gracia (n.d.). Language endangerment and language death. https://www.academia.edu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Elisabeth C. Zsiga, (2014). Languages in Africa: Multilingualism, Language policy, and Education. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. George Orekan (2010). Language Policy and Educational Development in Africa: The case study of Nigeria; in Scottish Languages Review, Issue 21, spring 2010, 17 – 26. Scotland’s National Centre for languages. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gerard Van Herk (2012). What is Sociolinguistics? Willey – Blackwell [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hohn, Viktor (2007). Language Death : When languages disappear. grin.com/document/73831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Isa,Baba Zanne (2014). Language death and endangered languages : Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 19, Issue 10, Ver. VI – Oct.2014 ; pp 46 – 48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jack C. Richards and Richard Schmidt (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4th Edition. Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. James Hawkey (2018). Language Attitudes and Minority Rights: The Case of Catalan in France. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jon Orman (2008). Language policy and Nation – Building in Post – Apartheid South Africa. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Julia Sallabank (2013). Attitudes to Endangered Languages: Identities and Policies. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ken D. Thomas (2015). Handbook of Research on Sustainable Development and Economics. USA: Business Science Reference. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Maaz Amjad et al. (2017). Threatening Language Detection and Target Identification in Urdu Tweets. IEEE Access. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mari C. Jones (Ed) (2015). Policy and Planning for Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nkonko M. Kamwangamalu (2016). Language Policy and Economics: The Language Question in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ofelia Gracia, (Eds) (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ogone John Obiero (2010). From Assessing Language Endangerment or Vitality to Creating and Evaluating Language Revitalization Programmes; Nordic Journal of African Studies 19(4):201- 226 (2010). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Paul M. Lewis and Gary F. Simons (2010). Assessing Endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS: Revue Roumaine de Linguistique. http://www.lingv.ro/resoursses/scm_images/-02-2010-Lewis [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Raj Mesthrie (2006). Language, Transformation and Development: a sociolinguistic appraisal of post –apartheid South African language policy and practice, in Southern African Linguistics and Applied language studies. South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rhonda Phillips and Robert H. Pittman (Eds) (2009). An Introduction to Community Development. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Robert B. Kaplan and Richard B. Baldauf (1997). Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Multilingual Matters Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Slavina Liliya Rustamovna et al. (2018). Assessing Language Vitality: Overview of Existing Models; Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tasaku Tsunoda (2006). Languaage Endangerment and Language Revitalization: An Introduction. Mouton de Gruyter: New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNESCO (2003). Language Vitality and Endangerment. Paris [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNESCO (2010). Atlas of the World languages in Danger. www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (2010). Why and How Africa should invest in African Languages and Multilingual Education. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Synonymy in the Songs of Ummaru Bagobiri: A Contextual Linguistics Analysis
• Aspect of Compounding and Affixation in Bassa-Nge
• Kinayah (Metonymy) in Malay: An Analysis Based on the Science of Balaghah
• Optimality Theory: Application of Dahl’s law in Kindia
• Selling Diversity: The Politics of Representation in Global Advertising