Leadership, Governance, and Local Development in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Systematic Literature Review

This study examines the role of leadership in shaping governance processes, public service delivery, and local development outcomes within decentralized systems in Southeast Asia using a qualitative systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA framework. It synthesizes empirical studies published from 2010 to 2025 focusing on local government institutions in the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, Timor-Leste, and other ASEAN member’s state. Literature searches were conducted through Google Scholar and ProQuest using keywords related to leadership, decentralization, governance, and public service delivery. From 1,000 initially identified records, 895 were excluded during initial screening and 53 were removed after full-text assessment, resulting in 52 studies included in the final synthesis. Findings reveal that leadership plays a central role in translating decentralization reforms into effective governance and development outcomes by strengthening accountability, decision-making, stakeholder engagement, institutional coordination, and service responsiveness. However, leadership effectiveness is highly context-dependent and is shaped by institutional design, political dynamics, administrative capacity, fiscal resources, and patronage or elite influence. The review further shows that even capable leaders may experience limited outcomes when governance systems are weak or politically constrained. The study concludes that improving decentralized governance requires a dual focus on leadership capacity-building and institutional reform, emphasizing ethical governance, participatory leadership, merit-based systems, and accountability mechanisms to support sustainable and inclusive development across Southeast Asia.

local leadership; service capacity; decentralization; ASEAN member states

1. Amri, M. (2020). Transformational leadership and public sector innovation in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Atienza, M. E. L. (2019). Decentralization and local governance reforms in the Philippines. Philippine Political Science Journal, 40(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Atienza, M. E. L., & Go, J. P. (2022). Local governance and decentralization in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(2), 145–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beggs, J., Santos, R., & Villanueva, P. (2023). Community participation and collaborative governance in Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 16(3), 210–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boex, J., & Simatupang, R. (2015). A comparative overview of local governance systems in selected countries. Local Public Sector Initiative Working Paper Series. Decentralization Net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brillantes, A. B., Jr., & Flores, H. P. (2012). Decentralization and good urban governance in Southeast Asia: Focus on the Philippines, Indonesia, and Thailand. In Y. Sheng & M. Thuzar (Eds.), Urbanization in Southeast Asia: Issues and impacts (pp. 293–319). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814380041-012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Capuno, J. J. (2015). The correlates of local government responsiveness under decentralization: Do performance ratings matter in the Philippines? International Journal of Public Administration, 38(7), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.949747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Diokno-Sicat, C., & Maddawin, R. (2018). Decentralization, local governance, and leadership capacity in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Flores, R. B. (2017). Decentralization and local governance in Southeast Asia: A passing review of development, reforms and approaches. Journal of Politics and Governance, 7(1), 60–71. Journal of Politics and Governance [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kulachai, W. (2020). Administrative decentralization and local autonomy in Thailand. Asian Administration and Management Review, 3(1), 34–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liwanag, H. J., & Wyss, K. (2019). Decentralization and health governance in the Philippines. Health Policy and Planning, 34(8), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz0xx (verify exact DOI) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Orbista, C. (2012). Participatory governance and local leadership in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 34(2), 123–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Robinson, M. (2007). Does decentralization improve equity and efficiency in public service delivery provision? IDS Bulletin, 38(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00337.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). The impact of decentralization on local governance and political dynasties in Southeast Asia. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjv033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Soares, M., Fernandes, J., & Costa, L. (2024). Digital governance and administrative reforms in Timor-Leste. Journal of Southeast Asian Governance, 12(1), 55–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Soputhy, H., Chenda, S., & Makara, V. (2023). Local health governance and decentralization in Cambodia. Asian Social Science Review, 15(2), 90–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Suryaman, E. (2021). Collaborative disaster governance and local leadership in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 58, 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102214 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Susilo, D. (2021). Political patronage and governance challenges in decentralized Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(2), 201–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tenorio, J., & Sanjorjo, P. (2021). Leadership development and institutional strengthening in local governance systems. Journal of Governance and Public Administration, 9(3), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Verbrugge, B. (2015). Decentralization, institutional ambiguity, and mineral resource conflict in Mindanao, Philippines. World Development, 67, 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Work, R. (2002). Overview of decentralization worldwide: A stepping stone to improved governance and human development. United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Understanding Academic Leadership: Theory, Practice and Future Horizons
• A Literature Review on Leadership and Cultural Evolution of Adventism in East Africa Region
• Unlocking Employee Creativity Through Empowering Leadership: The Dynamic Interplay of Trust and Engagement
• The Integration of Preachers’ Leadership Competencies in Empowering Preachers for the Orang Asli Community in Malaysia
• Traditional Authority vs. Legacy Leadership: A Comparative Literature Review from the Arab World