Loud Quitting in the Social Media Age: A Conceptual Study of Disengagement in Public Employees
Authors
Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, University of Lucknow (India)
Professor, Department of Commerce, University of Lucknow (India)
Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, University of Lucknow (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110100
Subject Category: Human Resource Management
Volume/Issue: 12/11 | Page No: 1105-1114
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-25
Accepted: 2025-12-01
Published: 2025-12-10
Abstract
This paper aims to explore a new trend known as loud quitting, a modern method to show dissatisfaction publicly on social media platforms. It looks at the forces that lead to disengagement, such as psychological contract violations and perceived organisational injustice. This disengagement leads to an open and visible act of expression, called loud quitting, which impacts the reputation and trust in the organisation. The study provides a framework for understanding the relationship between disengagement and loud quitting, which is moderated by social media-based impression management, drawing on Social Exchange Theory, Psychological Contract Theory, and Impression Management Theory. It highlights how online voice and self-presentation shape disengagement in current times.
Keywords
Loud Quitting, Social Media Age, Disengagement, Employee Voice, Public Employees, Social Exchange Theory
Downloads
References
1. Argyris, C. (1960), Understanding Organizational Behaviour, Tavistock Publications, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Balnave, N., A. Barnes, C. MacMillan, and L. Thornthwaite. 2014. “E-voice: How Network and Media Technologies are Shaping Employee Voice.” In Handbook of Research on Employee Voice, edited by A. Wilkinson, J. Donaghey, R. Freeman, and T. Dundon. (pp. 437-452). Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barnes, A., Balnave, N., Thornthwaite, L., & Manning, B. (2018). Social media: Union communication and member voice. In Employee voice at work (pp. 91-111). Singapore: Springer Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Beck, A. (2007). Web 2.0: Konzepte, Technologie, Anwendungen. HMD – Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik. 44 (255), 5-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Conway, E., P. Rosati, K. Monks, and T. Lynn. 2019. “Voicing Job Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction through Twitter: Employees’ Use of Cyberspace.” New Technology, Work and Employment 34: 139–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2009). Fifty years of psychological contract research: what do we know and what are the main challenges?. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 71-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government information quarterly, 30(4), 319-326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Definition: public employee from 18 USC § 716(c)(4) | LII / Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=18-USC-1901771397-855527186&term_occur=999&term_src=title:18:part:I:chapter:33:section:716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. DiMicco J., Millen D. R., Geyer W., Dugan C., Brownholtz B., Muller M. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 711-720). ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1460674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Dreher, S. 2014. “Social Media and the World of Work.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, doi:10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2 , 335–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Firth, R. 1967. Themes in economic anthropology. London: Tavistock. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Fusi, F., & Zhang, F. (2018). Social Media Communication in the Workplace: Evidence From Public Employees’ Networks. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(2), 245-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18804016 (Original work published 2020) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gallup, Inc. (2021). State of the Global Workplace Report. In Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ghani, B., & Malik, M. A. R. (2023). Social media and employee voice: a comprehensive literature review. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(14), 2407-2427. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Gostik, A. (2023). How Managers Can Overcome Loud Quitting. Avaliable at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adriangostick/2023/06/15/how-managers-can-overcome-loudquitting/?sh=2d02c74b1720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25: 161-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Harter, J., & Pendell, R. (2025). Global engagement falls for the second time since 2009. Gallup.com. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/659279/global-engagement-falls-second-time-2009.aspx (23.04.2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Holland, P., Cooper, B., & Hecker, R. (2019). Social media at work: A new form of employee voice? In P. Holland, J. Teicher, & J. D. Donaghey (Eds.), Employee voice at work. Work, organization, and employment (pp. 73–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2820-6_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Holland, P., Teicher, J., & Donaghey, J. (2018). Employee voice at work. In Work, organization, and employment. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2820-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Holland, P., Teicher, J., & Donaghey, J. (2018b). Employee voice at work. In Work, organization, and employment. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2820-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Homans, G. C. 1958. Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63: 597-606. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Hungerford, C., Jackson, D., & Cleary, M. (2024). Quiet quitting, resenteeism and other forms of disengagement: What are the answers for nurses. J. Adv. Nurs, 81, 2855-2857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Jackson, S. (2023). Nearly 1 in 5 workers are “loud quitting” their jobs, a new Gallup poll says — and it’s way more extreme than “quiet quitting.” Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-loud-quitting-job-definition-2023-6 (29.06.2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Kim S., Lee H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66, 370-385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological bulletin, 107(1), 34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Malinowski, B. 1922. Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipel-agoes of Melansian New Guinea. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Martensen, M., Börgmann, K., & Bick, M. (2011). The Impact of social networking sites on the employer-employee relationship. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Martin, G., Parry, E., & Flowers, P. (2015). Do social media enhance constructive employee voice all of the time or just some of the time? Human Resource Management Journal, 25(4), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Mauss, M. 1925. The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. New York: The Norton Library. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. McDonald, P., & Thompson, P. (2016). Social media (tion) and the reshaping of public/private boundaries in employment relations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), 69-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Mennie, P. (2015). Social media risk and governance: Managing enterprise risk. Kogan Page Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Miles, S. J., & Mangold, W. G. (2014). Employee voice: untapped resource or social media time bomb?. Business Horizons, 57(3), 401-411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Millham M. H., Atkin D. (2018). Managing the virtual boundaries: Online social networks, disclosure, and privacy behaviors. New Media & Society, 20, 50-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Mitchell, M. S., Cropanzano, R. S., & Quisenberry, D. M. (2012). Social exchange theory, exchange resources, and interpersonal relationships: A modest resolution of theoretical difficulties. In Handbook of social resource theory: Theoretical extensions, empirical insights, and social applications (pp. 99-118). New York, NY: Springer New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Pyman, A., Cooper, B., Teicher, J., & Holland, P. (2006). A comparison of the effectiveness of employee voice arrangements in Australia. Industrial Relations Journal, 37(5), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2006.00419.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Rothstein, B., & Sorak, N. (2017). Ethical codes for the public administration. A comparative survey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Rousseau, D.M. (1995) Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Rousseau, D.M. (1989) Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Rousseau, D.M. (1998) The ‘problem’ of the psychological contract considered. JourQ62 nal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 665–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 89(1), 925-946. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone age economics. New York: Aldine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Samdanis, M., & Lee, S. H. (2017). White space and digital remediation of design practice in architecture: A case study of Frank O. Gehry. Information and Organization, 27(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Tedeschi, J. T. (Ed.). (2013). Impression management theory and social psychological research. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Thibault, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. 1959. The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. United States Code. (2025). 18 U.S.C. § 716(c)(4). Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Walker, M. 2020. “Successful Social Media Resistance: Implications for Employee Voice.” Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 30 (2): 174–184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Wilkinson A, J Donaghey, T Dundon and R Freeman (2014) Employee voice: charting new terrain. In A Wilkinson, J Donaghey, T Dundon and R Freeman (eds) The handbook of research on employee voice, 3–16. Edward Elgar Press, London, UK. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Woo, K.H. (2022). Public Employment and Representative Bureaucracy. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_3238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Yikilmaz, I., & TARAKCI, A. P. D. H. D. (2023). Loud quitting vs. quiet quitting: a concetual investigation. In Business Journal 2nd International Paris Social Sciences Congress, December. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Young, A. M., and M. D. Hinesly. 2014. “Social Media use to Enhance Internal Communication: Course Design for Business Students.” Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 77 (4): 426–439. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
- A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
- Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
- Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
- Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement