Lunar Regolith as a Strategic Asset: Physical Hazards, Clinical Pathophysiology, and Geopolitical Implications of the Cislunar Resource Race
Authors
Researcher, San Antonio, TX (United States of America)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000486
Subject Category: Science and Space
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 6539-6545
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-05
Accepted: 2026-07-10
Published: 2026-07-20
Abstract
Lunar regolith—long regarded as an inert surface covering—has emerged in 2026 as the most strategically contested substrate in history. This paper examines three interlocking dimensions of the cislunar resource race: the severe mechanical and thermal engineering hazards posed by dust’s extreme angularity and electrostatic behavior; the insidious clinical pathophysiology of prolonged human exposure, ranging from pulmonary fibrosis and mutagenesis to cardiovascular and neurological sequelae; and the geopolitical architecture shaping competition for water ice, Helium-3, and rare earth elements at the lunar South Pole. We argue that mastery of regolith—both as a hazard to be mitigated and a resource to be extracted—will determine which coalition establishes the normative framework for extraterrestrial governance in the coming decades
Keywords
lunar regolith, cislunar geopolitics, space medicine, nanoscale materials science, EVA suit decontamination, Artemis Accords, ILRS, Helium-3, rare earth elements, pulmonary fibrosis, electrostatic dust transport
Downloads
References
1. NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Science Team. Permanently Shadowed Regions and Volatile Inventory at the Lunar South Pole. NASA Technical Report NAS-2024-LRO-17. 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Park J, et al. Toxicological assessment of lunar regolith simulants on human pulmonary epithelial cells. NPJ Microgravity. 2023;9(1):12–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. U.S. Department of State. Artemis Accords Signatory Update— 66 Nations. Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs; 2026 May 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Sviatoslavsky IN, Jacobs M. Helium-3 fusion and the lunar economy: technical and commercial viability. Fusion Eng Des. 2023;188:113412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. China National Space Administration. International Lunar Research Station Cooperation Framework (ILRS-CF). CNSA Press Release; 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Taylor LA, Liu Y. Lunar dust: the menace that wasn’t—and then was. Elements. 2022;18(3):147–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. NASA Johnson Space Center. Advanced Spacesuit and Suitport Technology Development for Lunar Surface Operations. JSC Technical Memorandum JSC-70142. 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]