Mapping The Intellectual Landscape of Borneo, Brunei and Sulu: A Three Decade Bibliometric Synthesis of Historical Research
Authors
University of Malaysia Sabah (Malaysia)
University of Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)
Sultan Idris Education University (Malaysia)
University of Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-01
Accepted: 2026-02-06
Published: 2026-02-16
Abstract
This study offers the first comprehensive bibliometric mapping of historical scholarship on Borneo, Brunei, and the Sulu region over the past three decades. Using a rigorously curated dataset of 298 publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, the analysis applies ScientoPy to examine publication trends, document types, prolific source titles, dominant research themes, conceptual models, institutional contributions, and highly cited works. The findings reveal a clear maturation of the field, with modest and sporadic output in the 1990s giving way to sustained growth from the mid-2000s and a marked acceleration after 2012, reflecting increasing international engagement and interdisciplinary integration. Peer-reviewed journal articles dominate the corpus, indicating a strong orientation toward high-impact scholarly dissemination. Key publication venues include the Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Quaternary Science Reviews, and JEBAT, which collectively anchor historical, archaeological, and interdisciplinary research on the region. Thematic analysis demonstrates a shift from descriptive, locality-focused narratives toward broader approaches encompassing prehistoric human mobility, colonial and imperial encounters, environmental governance, maritime networks, and transboundary regional histories. Despite this diversification, the limited application of explicit theoretical frameworks illustrated by the marginal presence of the Bayanihan model highlights an underdeveloped dimension of conceptual engagement. Overall, this study provides a systematic overview of the intellectual structure and evolution of Borneo-Brunei-Sulu historiography and identifies critical gaps and future directions for advancing high-impact, interdisciplinary historical research in Island Southeast Asia.
Keywords
Borneo-Brunei-Sulu history; bibliometric analysis; historiography
Downloads
References
1. Abdullah, K. H. (2023). Eco-literacy and social media: A bibliometric review. Journal of Scientometric Research, 12(3), 631–640. https://www.jscires.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abdullah, A.A., Lai, Y.M. (2022). The Development of the Oil and Gas Industry in Sabah (1881–1980): An Examination of the Exploration in the South China Sea; Perkembangan Industri Minyak dan Gas Sabah (1881–1980): Penelitian Terhadap Eksplorasi di Laut China Selatan. Kemanusiaan, 29.0(2), 177–210. https://doi.org/10.21315/KAJH2022.29.2.9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Abdul Latif, R., Wan Mahmud, W.A., Salman, A. (2013). A broadcasting history of Malaysia: Progress and shifts. Asian Social Science, 9.0(6), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n6p50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Adelaar, A. (2024). Malay (and Javanese) loanwords in Frederick de Houtman’s Malagasy wordlist. Wacana, 25.0(3). https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v25i3.1781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Adelaar, A., Kikusawa, K. (2014). Malagasy personal pronouns: A lexical history. Oceanic Linguistics, 53.0(2), 480–516. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2014.0020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Adelaar, K.A. (2006). Borneo as a Cross-Roads for Comparative Austronesian Linguistics. Austronesians: Historical And Comparative Perspectives, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Amirell, S.E. (2022). An Extremely Mild Form of Slavery horizontal ellipsis of the Worst Sort: American Perceptions of Slavery in the Sulu Sultanate, 1899-1904. Slavery & Abolition, 43.0(3), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2021.2008720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Amirell, S.E. (2019). The Sulu Sea. Pirates of Empire: Colonisation and Maritime Violence in Southeast Asia, 42–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Amirell, S.E. (2017). Pirates and pearls: Jikiri and the challenge to maritime security and American sovereignty in the Sulu Archipelago, 1907-1909. International Journal of Maritime History, 29.0(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0843871416678170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Amster, M.H. (2009). Portable Potency: Christianity, mobility and spiritual landscapes among the Kelabit. Anthropological Forum, 19.0(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664670903278429. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Annuar, S.N.S., Perman, A.A. (2023). The 15th General Election In Sabah: Issues, Trends and Challenges. Jebat-Malaysian Journal of History Politics and Strategic Studies, 50.0(2), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.17576/jebat.2023.5002.07. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ardhana, I.K., Puspitasari, N.W.R.N. (2023). Adat Law, Ethics, and Human Rights in Modern Indonesia. Religions, 14.0(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Armstrong, R. (1998). Insufficiency and lack: between production and consumption in a longhouse economy 1909-1996. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4.0(3), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Arzmi, A., Wahid, J. (2024). Theorizing the postcolonial city of Kuching: the socio-spatial production of colonial logistics. Planning Perspectives, 39.0(4), 903-923. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2023.2235669. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Barker, G. (2005). The archaeology of foraging and farming at Niah Cave, Sarawak. Asian Perspectives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Barker, G., Richards, M.B. (2013). Foraging-Farming Transitions in Island Southeast Asia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20.0(2), 256-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9150-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Bin Haji Mail, H.A.A., Tengah, A.H.B.A.H., Abu Bakar, H.T.H. (2019). History and development of Islamic education in Brunei Darussalam, 1900-1983: From home instruction to the religious primary school. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5.0(2), 1082–1101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Borschberg, P. (2017). The value of Admiral Matelieff's writings for studying the history of Southeast Asia, c.1600-1620. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48.0(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246341700056X. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Bosma, U. (2020). Communism, Cold War and Commodity Chains: Southeast Asian Labor History in a Comparative and Transnational Perspective. International Labor and Working-Class History, 97.0, 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0147547920000022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Bowring, P. (2019). The Sulu Factor: Trading, Raiding, Slaving. Empire of the Winds: The Global Role of Asia's Great Archipelago, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Carvalho, H.N. (2014). Carvalho, The Manufacturing Industries of the British Empire Overseas. Part 5, Newfoundland, West Indies, Ceylon, Malaya, Hong Kong, Sarawak, Drunci, Borneo (1931/2). British Economic Development In South East Asia, 1880-1939, VOL 2: Mining, Trade and Industry, 371-402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Chang, K.H., Stalling, J. (2023). Journey of a Sinophone Writer: Acceptance Speech for the 2023 Newman Prize for Chinese Literature. Chinese Literature and Thought Today, 54.0(1-2), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/27683524.2023.2205779. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Chaoui, N.J., Schmutz, H.K. (2002). Tradition and innovation in Zurich anthropology between 1915 and 1925; Tradition und Innovation in der Zürcher Anthropologie zwischen 1915 and 1925. Gesnerus - Swiss Journal of the History of Medicine and Sciences, 59.0(1-2), 87–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Chappell, A. (1998). TCS in Action: Case History 3: Increasing Links between the UK and Hong Kong through a TCS Scholarship. Industry and Higher Education, 12.0(1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/095042229801200110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Charbonneau, O. (2019). A New West in Mindanao: Settler Fantasies on the US Imperial Fringe. Journal Of The Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 18.0(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781418000634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Chazine, J.M., Ferrie, J.G. (2008). Recent archaeological discoveries in east Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, VOL 28, 28.0, 16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Cheong, A.R. (2014). Using oral history methods to document the subjective experiences of statelessness: The case of stateless Chinese-Bruneian immigrants in Vancouver. Tilburg Law Review, 19.0(1-2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-01902008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Dennell, R., & Petraglia, M. D. (2012). The dispersal of Homo sapiens across southern Asia: How early, how often, how complex? Quaternary Science Reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Dg. Junaidah Awang Jambol, et,al. 2025. Global Research Trends in Food Security: Insights From A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS). Vol.IX. Issues.1. 4221-4236. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Dg. Junaidah Awang Jambol, et.al. 2025. Unveiling AI in Education: A Global Bibliometric Review of Research Trends, Key Theories, and Innovations. ASEAN Artificial Intelligence Journal 1, Issue 1 (2025) 46-61. https://karyailham.com.my/index.php/aaij/index. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Dolbee, S. (2025). Agriculture of the Uprooted: The Assyrian Settlement on the Khabur and the Agrarian Solution to Refugees. Environmental History, 30.0(1), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1086/733367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Donoso, I. (2020). The Philippine connection in global Islam and the myth of Alexander; La conexión filipina del Islam global y el mito de Alejandro. Vegueta, 20.0, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Donoso, I. (2020). The Philippine Connection in Global Islam and the Myth of Alexander. Vegueta-Anuario De La Facultad De Geografia E Historia, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Doolittle, A.A. (2004). Powerful persuasions: The language of property and politics in Sabah, Malaysia (North Borneo), 1881-1996. Modern Asian Studies, 38.0(4), 821–850. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X04001222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Doolittle, A.A. (2005). Controlling the land - Property rights and power struggles in Sabah, Malaysia - (North Borneo), 1881-1996. Histories of the Borneo Environment: Economic, Political And Social Dimensions of Change and Continuity, 159–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Doolittle, A.A. (2003). Colliding discourses: Western land laws and native customary rights in North Borneo, 1881-1918. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 34.0(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463403000067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Eghenter, C. (2005). Histories of conservation or exploitation? Case studies from the interior of Indonesian Borneo. Histories of the Borneo Environment: Economic, Political and Social Dimensions of Change and Continuity, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Guerreiro, A. (2012). About an engraved skull from Borneo in the Museum of Anthropology of the University of Coimbra. Antropologia Portuguesa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Gallop, A.T. (2022). Qur’an manuscripts from Mindanao: collecting histories, art and materiality. South East Asia Research, 30.0(1), 23–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2021.1895674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Gallop, A.T. (2024). Malay Letters from Mindanao and Sulu from the Early Eighteenth Century. Philippine Studies-Historical And Ethnographic Viewpoints, 72.0(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Gavin, T. (2019). Seven Early Iban Kain Kebat. Textile Museum Journal, 46.0, 169–189. https://doi.org/10.7560/TMJ46010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Hampshire, E. (2006). Local and imperial networks: European settlement and the British Empire in Southeast Asia. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Hassan, G.S., Al-Rabaani, A.H., Nejjari, M. (2022). The tale of the two Sultanates, Oman and Brunei: Foreign policy and bilateral relations. Asian Affairs (United Kingdom), 49.0(3), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2022.2089523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Hawkins, M.C. (2011). Managing a Massacre: Savagery, Civility, and Gender in Moro Province in the Wake of Bud Dajo. Philippine Studies, 59.0(1), 83–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Hawkley, E.P. (2014). Reviving the Reconquista in Southeast Asia: Moros and the Making of the Philippines, 1565-1662. Journal Of World History, 25.0(2-3), 285–+. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2014.0014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Helliwell, C. (2014). The Japanese Malay: Ethnic categorisation in Southwest Borneo. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 170.0(2-3), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17002022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Hill, C., Soares, P., Mormina, M., Macaulay, V., Clarke, D., Blumbach, P., & Richards, M. (2007). A Mitochondrial Stratigraphy for Island Southeast Asia. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 80(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1086/510412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Jambol, D.J.A., Ali, I., Bee, B.B.B. (2023). The Involvement of the Brunei Malay Community in Education on the West Coast of North Borneo, 1881-1963. Jebat-Malaysian Journal of History Politics and Strategic Studies, 50.0(4), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.17576/jebat.2023.5004.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Jones, M. (2000). Creating Malaysia: Singapore security, the Borneo territories, and the contours of British policy, 1961–63. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Jones, S. E., Hunt, C. O., & Reimer, P. J. (2013). A 2300-year record of sago and rice use from the Kelabit Highlands, Sarawak. The Holocene, 23(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Lambourn, E. (2004). The formation of the Batu Aceh tradition in fifteenth-century Southeast Asia. Indonesia and the Malay World. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Ptak, R. (2004). The political and economic background of Ming voyages to the Indian Ocean. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Piper, P. J., Rabett, R. J., & Bin Kurui, E. (2008). New evidence for early modern human settlement in Borneo: The Late Upper Pleistocene site of Bukit Bunuh, Sarawak. Antiquity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Santika, T., Meijaard, E., Budiharta, S., Law, E. A., Kusworo, A., Hutabarat, J. A., Indrawan, T. P., Struebig, M. J., Raharjo, S., Huda, I., Sulhani, S., & Wilson, K. A. (2017). Community forest management in Indonesia: Avoided deforestation in the context of anthropogenic and climate complexities. Global Environmental Change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Szabó, P. (2014). Historical ecology: past, present and future. Biological Reviews, 90(4), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Saunders, D. (2019). Dimming the Seas around Borneo: Contesting Island Sovereignty and Lighthouse Administration amidst the End of Empire, 1946–1948. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 7(2), 181-207. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Stockwell, A. J. (2004). Malaysia: British policy and decolonization, 1942–1963. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Yap, F. (2011). Between nationalism and communism: The political thought of left-wing Chinese intellectuals in colonial Malaya. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Yeo, M. (2025). Before the port city: coastal settlements and colonialism in Borneo. URBAN HISTORY. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926825100266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Yeo, M.C. (2025). The spaces of colonial towns: urban life in North Borneo, 1900s-1930s. URBAN HISTORY. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926825000094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Zaidi, A., David, M.K. (2015). Fluidity and acculturation: the case of Pakistani Punjabis in Brunei Darussalam. South Asian Diaspora, 7.0(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2015.1016830. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Zhang, M. (2024). Empire of Impartiality: Managing Indebtedness to Foreigners in Eighteenth-Century China. Journal Of Global History, 19.0(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740022823000311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Agarwood: A Fragrant Link between India and Southeast Asia
- Pens of Protest: Malayalam Press in the Freedom Struggle
- Long-Term Trends of Temperature and Rainfall in Sivakasi: A Climatic Assessment (1980–2025)
- Iran’s Forgotten Friend William Morgan Shuster: Victim of Anglo-Russian Conspiracy
- The (Moordkop) Murder Hill Massacre 1830: A Historical Analysis of the Griqua-Ndebele Conflict