Media, Hate Speech, and National Cohesion in Nigeria: An Empirical Study of Media Discourse and Security Implications (2018–2025)

Hate speech has become a persistent feature of Nigeria’s media environment, particularly within digital and political communication spaces. This study empirically examines how hate speech is produced, framed, and disseminated through Nigerian media and analyses its implications for national unity and security between 2018 and 2025. Anchored on media framing and agenda- setting theories, the study adopts a mixed-methods approach relying on secondary quantitative media-monitoring data and qualitative discourse analysis of selected media texts. Findings reveal a consistent rise in hate speech during election cycles and conflict-related reporting, with social media and online news platforms serving as major amplification channels. The results further indicate a strong association between media hate speech narratives and increased incidents of communal violence, political tension, and security threats. Weak regulatory enforcement and politicization of media institutions limit the effectiveness of existing responses. The study concludes that unchecked media hate speech undermines national cohesion and security and recommends stronger media regulation, ethical journalism enforcement, and sustained digital media literacy initiatives.

Hate Speech, Media Studies, National Unity, Digital Media

1. Adebiyi, A. A., Adeosun, K. G., Popoola, T., Aliyu, M. E., & Adejumobi, H. A. (2025). Media and the propagation of hate speech in Nigeria: A critical analysis of implications for national security and social cohesion. African Journal for the Psychological Studies of Social Issues, 28(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeyanju, C. T., & Neverson, N. (2019). Fake news, hate speech and political participation in Nigeria. African Journalism Studies, 40(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Benesch, S. (2014). Dangerous speech: A proposal to prevent group violence. World Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ejiga, I., & Ede, P. O. (2024). Electorates’ analysis of hate speech dynamics on Facebook during the 2023 Nigerian presidential election campaigns. University of Jos Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 261–286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ezeibe, C. C. (2015). Hate speech and political conflict in Nigeria. African Security Review, 24(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ezeibe, C. C., & Iwuoha, V. C. (2017). Ethnic and religious conflicts in Nigeria. Journal of African Studies, 45(3), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ojebuyi, B. R., & Adegbola, O. (2021). Social media, political communication and hate speech in Nigeria. Journal of African Media Studies, 13(2), 223–240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Okorie, N., & Oyedepo, T. (2020). Digital media and conflict escalation in Nigeria. Media, War & Conflict, 13(3), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Oso, L. (2017). Media, conflict and peacebuilding in Nigeria. Journal of Communication Studies, 5(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Oso, L., & Pate, U. (2018). Media regulation and hate speech in Nigeria. Malthouse Press. Smith, A. D. (1991). National identity. University of Nevada Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Parekh, B. (2012). Is there a case for banning hate speech? In M. Herz & P. Moinar (Eds.), The Content and context of hate speech: Rethinking regulation and responses (PP. 37-56) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. UNESCO. (2018). Countering online hate speech. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2013). Rabat plan on action on the prohibition of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitements to discrimination, hostility or violence (A/HRC/22/17/Add.4). Geneva: United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Waldron, J. (2012). The harm in hate speech. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wolfsfeld, G. (2018). The role of the media in conflict. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Humor, Critique, and Companionship: Audience Reception of an Unconventional Tiktok Marriage Proposal on Youtube
• Affective Visibility: Monetizing Care Work and Emotional Labor Among Full-Time Mothers on Douyin
• Generation Z Perception Towards Ai and Human Copywriting in Maggi Advertisements
• Comparative Analysis of Brand Copywriting in the Generative AI Advertising Era