Modeling Farmers’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt Digital Technologies in Primary Cambodian Agricultural Hubs
Authors
Graduate School, Royal University of Agriculture, Khan Dang Kor, Cambodia, (Cambodia)
CAPRED, 17th floor, GIA Tower, Koh Pich City, 12301 Sopheak Mongkol Rd, Phnom Penh (Cambodia)
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, 200 Preah Norodom Blvd (41), Sangkat Tonle Basac, Khan Chamkamorn, Phnom Penh (Cambodia)
Techo Startup Center, Business Development Center, 11th floor, OCIC street, Sangkat Chroy Chongva, Khan Chroy Chongva, Phnom Penh (Cambodia)
Alliance Bioversity International and CIAT, Via di S. Domenico, 1, 00153 Roma RM, Italy (Cambodia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000064
Subject Category: Agriculture
Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 853-878
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-17
Accepted: 2026-09-22
Published: 2026-10-05
Abstract
As Cambodia advances its digital agricultural ecosystem under national strategic policy frameworks, understanding farmers' adoption of digital agricultural technologies Modeling Farmers’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt Digital Technologies in Primary Cambodian Agricultural Hubs is critical for inclusive rural development. This study evaluates the structural determinants influencing farmers' behavioral intention to adopt digital agricultural tools using an adapted Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. Empirical data were collected from a sample of 400 gender-balanced farmers across ten districts in eight primary paddy rice and vegetable producing provinces. Following a two-stage scale purification process that reduced an initial 86-item pool to 30 finalized indicators, latent constructs were evaluated using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in JASP (version 0.19.2) with z-score standardization.
Keywords
Performance Expectancy, UTAUT, PLS-SEM, Technology Adoption, Scale Standardization
Downloads
References
1. ADB. (2021). Cambodia Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Rural Development Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. ADB. (2026). Asian Development Outlook. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aung, E. D., Sasaki, N., Tsusaka, T. W., & Silpasuwanchai, C. (2025). Investigating farmers’ adoption of mobile Agri-Tech: A TAM-Based study of KaseChar in Eastern Thailand. Global Transitions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bacalso, F., Rendon, I. P., Campita, R. A., Mobo, F. D., & Cutillas, A. (2023). Examining the acceptance of automated piggery cleaner system using UTAUT model for hog business in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(7), 2544–2557. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Baker, E. W., Al-Gahtani, S. S., & Hubona, G. S. (2010). Cultural impacts on acceptance and adoption of information technology in a developing country. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 18(3), 35–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Banga, K., Rodriguez, A. R., & te Velde, D. W. (2020). DIGITALLY ENABLED ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION AND POVERTY. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chan, S., Ngorn, C., & Hem, M. (2020). Digital Challenges and Opportunities for Agribusiness Enterprises in Cambodia: Implications for the Cambodian Economies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Deichmann, U., Goyal, A., & Mishra, D. (2016). Will digital technologies transform agriculture in developing countries? Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 21–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Diana, M. I. N., Zulkepli, N. A., Ern, L. K., & Zainol, M. R. (2024). Factors affecting behavioral intentions of farmers in Southeast Asia to technology adoption: A systematic review analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 367, 122045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Diaz, A. C., Sasaki, N., Tsusaka, T. W., & Szabo, S. (2021). Factors affecting farmers’ willingness to adopt a mobile app in the marketing of bamboo products. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 11, 200056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Fuglie, K., Gautam, M., Goyal, A., & Maloney, W. F. (2019). Improving the Enabling Environment for Technology Adoption. Harvesting Prosperity: Technology and Productivity Growth in Agriculture2019, 147–185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gabriel, A., & Gandorfer, M. (2023). Adoption of digital technologies in agriculture—an inventory in a european small-scale farming region. Precision Agriculture, 24(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09931-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Geng, W., Liu, L., Zhao, J., Kang, X., & Wang, W. (2024). Digital Technologies Adoption and Economic Benefits in Agriculture: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Sustainability, 16(11), 4431. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Genius, M., Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2014). Information transmission in irrigation technology adoption and diffusion: Social learning, extension services, and spatial effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 328–344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. University of Kansas, KS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Heng, P. (2025). The Digital Economy in Cambodia. https://www.eria.org/uploads/2_ch_2-Cambodia.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Hoang, H. G., & Tran, H. D. (2023). Smallholder farmers’ perception and adoption of digital agricultural technologies: An empirical evidence from Vietnam. Outlook on Agriculture, 52(4), 457–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Iskandar, D., & Gatzweiler, Fran. (2014). An optimization model for technology adoption of marginalized smallholders: theoretical support for matching technological and institutional innovations. Available at SSRN 2483033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Joseph Mkunda, J. (2025). Cold Chain Technology Adoption in Agriculture: Insights from the UTAUT Model on Vegetable Producers’ Willingness. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 20(2), 79–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Karbo, R. T., Frewer, L. J., Areal, F., Jones, G., & Nurudeen, S. (2024). A systematic review of the efficacy of theories used to understand farmers’ technology adoption behavior in lower-to-middle-income countries. Development Studies Research, 11(1), 2294696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Larasati, N., Putri, A. A., Soemodinoto, A. S., Alyssa, N., & Shoofiyani, O. S. (2024). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model to understand farmer’s readiness: Implementation of precision agriculture based on digital IoT monitoring apps in West Java, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 14(3), 176–183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Maddison, D. (2007). The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa (Vol. 4308). World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Siraj, M., Lu, X., & Qiyang, G. (2025). Digital agriculture technology adoption in low and middle-income countries—a review of contemporary literature. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1621851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Mastenbroek, A., Sirutyte, I., & Sparrow, R. (2021). Information barriers to adoption of agricultural technologies: willingness to pay for certified seed of an open pollinated maize variety in Northern Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(1), 180–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Michels, M., Bonke, V., & Musshoff, O. (2020). Understanding the adoption of smartphone apps in crop protection. Precision Agriculture, 21, 1209–1226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Montesclaros, J. M. L., & Teng, P. S. (2023). Digital technology adoption and potential in Southeast Asian agriculture. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 20(2), 7–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Mwangi, M., & Kariuki, S. (2015). Factors determining adoption of new agricultural technology by smallholder farmers in developing countries. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Nguyen, L. L. H., Khuu, D. T., Halibas, A., & Nguyen, T. Q. (2024). Factors that influence the intention of smallholder rice farmers to adopt cleaner production practices: An empirical study of precision agriculture adoption. Evaluation Review, 48(4), 692–735. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Nickens, P., Ader, D., Enriquez, J. P., Bates, R., Gill, T., Huot, S., Hok, L., & Pao, S. (2023). Where do Smallholder Farmers get Their Information? An Exploration of the Sources of Agricultural Information in Northwest Cambodia. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 30(2), 160–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Nookhao, S., Kiattisin, S., & Thananant, V. (2025). The role of technology readiness motivators, positive and negative impact toward smart farming technology adoption: Insight from Thai farmers. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(2), 100380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Ravindran, Y., Haris, N. B. M., Shah, J. A., & Ilahi, W. F. F. (2024). UTAUT Model Insights on the Adoption of Smart Farming Technologies (SFTs) in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(8), 4011–4020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. RGC. (2023). Pentagonal Strategy Phase-I. https://asset.cambodia.gov.kh/mptc/2023/08/KH-PENTAGONAL-STRATEGY-PHASE-I.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Ruzzante, S., Labarta, R., & Bilton, A. (2021). Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Development, 146, 105599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Saili, A. R., Zaman, N. B. K., Noor, W. N. W. M., Fatah, F. A., & Abdullah, F. A. (2024). Smart farming: Challenges and adoption factors among paddy farmers in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor. Information Management and Business Review, 16(4), 394–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Shachak, A., Kuziemsky, C., & Petersen, C. (2019). Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 100, 103315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Sihombing, M. T., Hubeis, M., & Cahyadi, E. R. (2024). Analisis adopsi dan penggunaan aplikasi pertanian digital oleh petani skala kecil di Kabupaten Tuban dengan model UTAUT. MANAJEMEN IKM: Jurnal Manajemen Pengembangan Industri Kecil Menengah, 19(2), 80–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Thar, S. P., Ramilan, T., Farquharson, R. J., Pang, A., & Chen, D. (2021). An empirical analysis of the use of agricultural mobile applications among smallholder farmers in Myanmar. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 87(2), e12159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. The Asia Foundation. (2023). THE CURRENT STATE AND ROLE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES (MSME) WITHIN THE CAMBODIAN TOURISM SECTOR. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/The-Current-State-and-Role-of-Digital-Technology-Adoption-in-Tourism-MSMEs-in-Cambodia.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Thi Hoa Sen, L., Chou, P., Dacuyan, F. B., Nyberg, Y., & Wetterlind, J. (2024). Barriers and enablers of digital extension services’ adoption among smallholder farmers: the case of Cambodia, the Philippines and Vietnam. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(1), 2368351. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Ulhaq, I., Pham, N. T. A., Le, V., Pham, H.-C., & Le, T. C. (2022). Factors influencing intention to adopt ICT among intensive shrimp farmers. Aquaculture, 547, 737407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. USAID. (2018). Data-Driven Agriculture: The Future of Smallholder Farmer Data Management. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/Data_Driven_Agriculture_Farmer_Profile.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Uy, T. C., Limnirankul, B., Kramol, P., Hoang Gia, H., & Nguyen Thi, D. T. (2025). Digital technology adoption among smallholder farmers in Vietnam: Implications for digital agricultural extension strategies. Journal of International Development, 37(2), 351–370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D., & Davis, G. B. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Verdegem, P., & De Marez, L. (2011). Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview. Technovation, 31(8), 411–423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Zhang, X., Yang, Q., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., & Masud, M. M. (2024). Acceptance of new agricultural technology among small rural farmers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1641. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
- Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
- Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
- The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District