Moderating Effect of Financing Dynamics on the Relationship between Supply Chain Management Functions and Operational Performance of the Uganda Police Force

According to the Uganda Police Force (UPF) Annual Crime Reports (2018–2023), crime increased by 15%, crime clearance rates declined from 60.8% to 60.3%, and average emergency response time remained at 45 minutes compared to the global benchmark of 15 minutes. While these performance challenges may arise from multiple organizational, operational, and environmental factors, effective supply chain management functions remain critical in facilitating timely deployment of resources and service delivery. Existing studies on supply chain management have not adequately addressed the UPF context and have given limited attention to financing dynamics as a moderating variable. This study examined the moderating effect of financing dynamics on the relationship between supply chain management functions and operational performance of the Uganda Police Force. Guided by the Resource-Based View theory, the study adopted a positivist philosophy and a quantitative approach using a correlational research design. The target population comprised 10,141 police officers from regional police headquarters and divisions within Uganda’s four major cities. A sample of 370 respondents was selected using stratified sampling, while a pilot study was conducted among 50 officers. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Pearson correlation and hierarchical regression. Reliability results yielded Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.85. The findings revealed that financing dynamics significantly moderated the relationship between supply chain management functions and operational performance (interaction β = 0.342, ΔR² = 0.092, p < 0.05), indicating that the positive effect of supply chain management functions is strengthened when adequate financial resources are available. The study extends the Resource-Based View by demonstrating that financing dynamics function as a strategic enabling resource that enhances the effectiveness of supply chain management functions in improving operational performance.

Financing dynamics (FD), encompassing the adequacy, allocation, sources and timeliness

1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cheng, J., Bi, G., & Shahzad, U. (2024). Influence of dynamic capabilities and supply chain finance on supply chain effectiveness in environmental dynamism: A conditional process analysis. Operations Management Research, 17, 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00425-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (6th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Duan, W., Hu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). What determines the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises supply chain financing? A qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy sets based on the technology–organization–environment framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 976218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Li, J., He, Z., & Wang, S. (2022). A survey of supply chain operation and finance with Fintech: Research framework and managerial insights. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, 108431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Geng, L. (2024). Digital finance, financing constraints and supply chain resilience. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lou, Z., Xie, Q., Shen, J. H., & Lee, C.-C. (2024). Does supply chain finance (SCF) alleviate funding constraints of SMEs? Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mao, J., Xie, J., Gao, Y., Tang, Q., Li, Z., & Zhang, B. (2024). Navigating growth: The nexus of supply chain finance, digital maturity, and financial health in Chinese A-share listed corporations. Sustainability, 16(13), 5418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sarpong, K. O., & Oppong, M. (2023). Contributions of financial resource availability on green supply chain management and firm environmental performance in manufacturing firms: Evidence from Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. International Journal of Supply Chain and Logistics, 7(2), 92–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wetzel, P., & Hofmann, E. (2019). Supply chain finance, financial constraints and corporate performance: An explorative network analysis and future research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 216, 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wang, J., Zhang, Q., & Hou, P. (2022). Implications of credit default and yield uncertainty on supply chain's equilibrium financial strategy. Annals of Operations Research, 315(1), 507–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04691-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wang, X., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., & Tang, X. (2022). The impact of the scale of third-party logistics guaranteeing firms on bank credit willingness in supply chain finance: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 853888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853888 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Effectiveness of Logistics Management - A Case Study of: Future Supply Chain Solutions Ltd (FSC)
• The Effect of E-Informing on Procurement Performance of Public Universities in Kenya: The Case of Egerton University
• Barriers to Circular Supply Chain Implementation in Indian Textile SMEs: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
• Sustainable Supply Chain to Enhance the Environmental Performance in the Cleaning Detergents Manufacturing Industry: Case of Harare, Zimbabwe
• Exploring Innovative Frontiers: Digital Public Infrastructure and Multimodal Connectivity as Catalysts for MSME Supply Chain Transformation in India