Muslim Behavioural Intention Toward Cryptocurrency: The Role of Subjective Norm from a Pilot Study
Authors
Universiti Teknologi MARA Dungun Campus, Terengganu, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam Campus, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi MARA Segamat Campus, Johor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000066
Subject Category: Cryptocurrency
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 720-723
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-09
Accepted: 2026-03-14
Published: 2026-03-31
Abstract
The advancement of technology has led to the increasing use of cryptocurrency, which is known for its resistance to alteration and manipulation. However, Islamic scholars hold differing opinions regarding its permissibility, some consider it lawful, while others regard it as prohibited. This pilot study explored Muslim users’ behaviour intention toward cryptocurrency by employing the Subjective Norm variable. Questionnaires were distributed via online communication platforms. Among the tested variables, subjective norm was highlighted in this study. The results indicate that the opinions of individuals valued by the respondents, as well as those close to them, recorded the highest mean scores. In conclusion, the types of cryptocurrencies held by Muslims reflect their level of interest in this digital asset. Future research should incorporate additional analyses to expand understanding in this area.
Keywords
Cryptocurrency, Muslim Behaviour, Subjective Norm
Downloads
References
1. Almarashdeh, I. (2018). An overview of technology evolution: Investigating the factors influencing non-bitcoins users to adopt bitcoins as online payment transaction method. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(13), 3984-3993.http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol96No13/1Vol96No13.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anser, M. K., Zaigham, H., Rasheed, M. I., Pitafi, H., & Iqbal, J. (2019). Social media usage and individuals' intentions toward adopting bitcoin: The role of the theory of planned behavior and perceived risk. International Journal of Communication Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ayedh, A., Echchabi, A., Battour, M., & Omar, M. (2020). Malaysian Muslim investors’ behaviour towards the blockchain-based bitcoin cryptocurrency market. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2019-0081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Giudici, G., Milne, A., & Vinogradov, D. (2019). Cryptocurrencies: Market Analysis and Perspectives. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 47, 1-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00138-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gunawan, F. F., & Novendra, R. (2017). An analysis of bitcoin acceptance in Indonesia. ComTech Computer Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 8(4), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v8i4.3885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ku-Mahamud, K. R., Omar, M., Bakar, N. A. A., & Muraina, I. (2019). Awareness, trust, and adoption of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency among blockchain communities in Malaysia. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 1217-1222. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.4.6280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y., & Guo, Y. (2013). Construct DTPB model by using DEMATEL: A study of a university library website. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 47(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331311313744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Leejoeiwara, B. (2013). Modeling adoption intention of online education in Thailand using the extended decomposed theory of planned behavior (DTPB) with self-directed learning. AU Journsl of Management, 11(2), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Mazambani, L., & Mutambara, E. (2019). Predicting fintech innovation adoption in South Africa: the case of cryptocurrency. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 11(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-04-2019-0152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Murko, A., & Vrhovec, S. L. R. (2019). Bitcoin adoption: Scams and anonymity may not matter but trust into bitcoin security does. Proceeding of the Third Central European Cyber Security Conference, 15, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360664.3360679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Othman, R., Noordin, M. F., Ahmed, M., Ahmad, N., & Kassim, S. (2023). Muslim Scholars and Experts Views on Cryptocurrencies: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Islamic Banking and Financ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Statista. (2023). Crypto ownership by country 2019-2024. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1202468/global-cryptocurrency-ownership/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Walton, A., & Johnston, K. (2018). Exploring perception of bitcoin adoption: The South African virtual community perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 165-182. https://doi.org/10.28945/4080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yeong, Y. C., Kalid, K. S., & Sugathan, S. K. (2019a). Cryptocurrency acceptance: A case of Malaysia. Proceeding at International conference on Recents Advancements in Engineering and Technology (ICRAET-18), Telangana, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Yeong, Y. C., Kalid, K. S., & Sugathan, S. K. (2019b). Cryptocurrency adoption in Malaysia: Does age, income and education level matter? International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(11), 2179-2184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]