Mystery at the Navel-A Surgical Detective Story on Migration of Copper T to the Anterior Abdominal Wall: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Authors

Dr. V. M. K. Ayesha Reshma (Postgraduate)

Department of General Surgery, Government Mohan Kumaramanaglam Medical College Hospital, Salem, India (India)

Dr. M. Arulkumaran MS, MRCS, DA(Professor)

Department of General Surgery, Government Mohan Kumaramanaglam Medical College Hospital, Salem, India (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000075

Subject Category: general surgery

Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 3429-3435

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-04

Accepted: 2026-05-09

Published: 2026-05-29

Abstract

Background: Uterine perforation and extra-uterine migration of intrauterine devices (IUDs) are uncommon complications. Migration to the anterior abdominal wall is extremely rare, with only sporadic reports in the literature.
Case presentation: We report a 22 year-old woman who presented with one month history of pain and discharge from the umblicus. She had a history of Copper T insertion three years earlier. Clinical examination revealed a firm, non-tender swelling in the lower anterior abdominal wall. Ultrasonography and computed tomography demonstrated a T-shaped metallic foreign body located in the anterior abdominal wall, superficial to the rectus sheath. The device was successfully retrieved through a diagnostic laparoscopy followed by open omphalectomy. The postoperative period was uneventful.
Conclusion: Migration of a Copper T to the anterior abdominal wall is an exceptionally rare occurrence. Missing IUD threads should prompt evaluation for migration. A combination of ultrasound, X-ray, and CT scan aids accurate localization. Surgical retrieval, either laparoscopic or open, remains the definitive management.

Keywords

Copper T, intrauterine device, uterine perforation, migration, anterior abdominal wall, laparoscopy

Downloads

References

1. Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell DH. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2016;7:19-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Verstraeten V, et al. Migration of intrauterine devices: a contemporary review. Open Access J Contracept. 2024;15:123-131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Mosley FR, Shahi N, Kurer MA. Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2109-2114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J. Uterine perforation on IUD insertion: results from the New Zealand pharmacovigilance study. Contraception. 2003;67(5):359-363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ansari AH, et al. Migration of copper T to the anterior abdominal wall: case report. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3:26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arif SH, et al. Migrated intrauterine device presenting as anterior abdominal swelling. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12:e230112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Addis NA, et al. Migrated intrauterine device to infra-umbilical skin: a case report. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24:54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mahajan P, et al. Unusual anterior abdominal wall migration of intrauterine device. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):1164-1166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rahnemai-Azar AA, et al. Imaging and surgical management of migrated intrauterine devices. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2915-2921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. World Health Organization. Mechanisms of Action, Safety and Efficacy of Intrauterine Devices. Geneva: WHO; . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles