National Security Laws and Freedom of the Press in India: Constitutional Limits, Judicial Responses, and Democratic Concerns
Authors
Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Quantum University, Roorkee (India)
BB.A., LL.B (H.), Final Year Student, Department of Law, Quantum University, Roorkee (India)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-19
Accepted: 2026-05-24
Published: 2026-07-10
Abstract
Freedom of press is an integral part of a democratic country as it permits citizens to stay knowledgeable, informed and express their opinions and keep the government accountable. In India freedom of the press is safeguard under article 19(1)(a) of the Indian constitution as part of the freedom of speech and expression. This initiates an ongoing strain between the need to protect national security and need to secure a free and independent press. The study explores the friction by scrutinizing how national security laws in India affects the freedom of press and the role of the judiciary in this context The study highlights the ways in which Courts have established principles such as reasonableness, proportionality and the requirement of a direct connection between the speech and threat to National Security.
The study also gives light on the democratic issues emerging from the exploitation of national security laws. The freedom of press praises an essential role in maintaining accountability transparency and informed public participation. When the freedom of press is curbed without reasonable justification, it diminishes the value of democratic institution and public trust. The research deduces that although judiciary has taken important measures to protect the freedom of the press, stringent safeguards and adequate standards are required to prevent misuse of national security laws. Securing an impartial and just balance between national security and freedom of the press is crucial for protecting constitutional values and nourish democracy in India
Keywords
Freedom of the Press, Judicial Review, Media Freedom, Rule of Law, Public Interest
Downloads
References
1. H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India vols. I–III (4th ed., Universal Law Publishing 2015), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. https://www.universallawpublishing.com/product/constitutional-law-of-india/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law (9th ed., LexisNexis 2022), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. https://www.lexisnexis.in/detail.aspx?prodid=22837 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Durga Das Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (26th ed., LexisNexis 2023), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. https://www.lexisnexis.in/detail.aspx?prodid=22336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. B.N. Pandey, The Constitutional Law of India (Central Law Agency 2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. A.G. Noorani, The RSS and the BJP: A Division of Labour (Left Word Books 2000). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, A.I.R. 1950 S.C. 124 (India), https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1768773/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi, A.I.R. 1950 S.C. 129 (India), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 955 (India), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 S.C.C. 1 (India), https://indiankanoon.org/doc/110813550/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) 3 S.C.C. 637 (India), https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82461587/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, (1997) 1 S.C.C. 301 (India), https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1766147/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Media One TV Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, (2023) 7 S.C.C. 1 (India), https://indiankanoon.org/doc/142782410/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. India Constitution. Arts. 19(1)(a), 19(2), https://legislative.gov.in/constitution-of-india/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, No. 37 of 1967.https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Official Secrets Act, No. 19 of 1923, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. National Security Act, No. 65 of 1980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Gautam Bhatia, National Security and Judicial Review, 12 NUJS L. REV. (2019), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. https://nujslawreview.org/2019/12/31/national-security-and-judicial-review/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Anil Kalhan, Colonial Continuities: Human Rights, Terrorism, and Security Laws in India, 20 COLUM. J. ASIAN L. (2006), https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjal/article/view/3430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ujjwal Kumar Singh, The Sedition Law Debate in India, 51 ECON. & POL. WKLY., no. 32 (2016), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. https://www.epw.in/journal/2016/32/commentary/sedition-law-debate-india.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217 (III) A, art. 19 (Dec. 10, 1948), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art. 19, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. U.N. Human Rights Comm., General Comment No. 34, Article 19: Freedoms of Opinion and Expression, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/GC/34 (2011). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Ayurveda and Skin Health: A Comprehensive Framework for the Management of Dermatological Disorders
- Gender and Political Exclusion: An Analysis of Women's Marginalization in India's Democracy
- Safety Standards Compliance among Universities Employees in Nairobi County, Kenya During the Covid-19 Pandemic
- Cedi Appreciation Relative to Fuel Prices - A Machine Learning and Ancient Geomantic Approach