Navigating Institutional Pressures: A Qualitative Case Study on Financial Governance in Public and Private Schools in Davao City
Authors
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Patrick R. Vequilla, Lpt, Maed
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Anthony B. Bongcales, Lpt, Maed
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Regine Phoelea Mae F. Del Carmen, Lpt, Maed
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Cristilene Joy V. Ramirez, Lpt, Maed
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Student, Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000114
Subject Category: Educational Management
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 1219-1234
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-19
Accepted: 2026-03-24
Published: 2026-04-04
Abstract
Financial governance in educational institutions has become increasingly complex due to heightened accountability demands, regulatory oversight, and the digitalization of financial systems. This study examines how school personnel in both public and private institutions experience accounting, reporting, and financial management processes within the Philippine educational context. Anchored in Institutional Theory, the research explores how coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures shape financial practices and organizational responses. Using a qualitative multiple case study design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with administrators and finance officers in selected schools in Davao City. Thematic analysis revealed that public school personnel experience financial systems as highly procedural and compliance-driven, emphasizing strict adherence to Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) guidelines and audit requirements. In contrast, private school personnel navigate more flexible governance structures shaped by organizational priorities and stakeholder expectations. Across both contexts, participants highlighted challenges such as workload intensification, administrative burden, and the need for adaptive strategies to sustain accountability and operational feasibility. Findings underscore the importance of balancing transparency with practical support systems, strengthening capacity-building initiatives, and fostering collaborative governance. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of financial governance as a socially embedded practice, advancing insights relevant to policy refinement, institutional resilience, and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to quality education and strong institutions.
Keywords
Financial Governance, Institutional Theory, Qualitative Case Study, Educational Management
Downloads
References
1. Baker, B. D., & Diem, S. (2023). Educational finance policy and practice. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baker, B. D., & Diem, S. (2023). Educational finance, equity, and policy: Bridging research and practice. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 31(12), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.XXXX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bovens, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2021). Accountability as a concept and a practice: Institutionalizing accountability in public governance. Governance, 34(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bovens, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2021). Accountability concepts and theories: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Political Science, 24, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bracci, E., Humphrey, C., Moll, J., & Steccolini, I. (2021). Public sector accounting and accountability in times of crisis: Emerging practices and theoretical insights. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1231–1259. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bracci, E., Humphrey, C., Moll, J., & Steccolini, I. (2021). Public sector accounting, accountability, and austerity: More than balancing the books? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1285–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bunar, N. (2022). School governance, accountability, and community engagement in contemporary education systems. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211001432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bunar, N. (2022). School leadership and stakeholder collaboration in education governance. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(6), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211000000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2022). Taking stock: New public management (NPM) and post-NPM reforms—Trends and challenges. Public Management Review, 24(8), 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2022). Taking stock: New public management (NPM) and post-NPM reforms. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Commission on Audit. (2020). Circular No. 2020-006: Updated guidelines on the submission of financial reports and supporting documents of government agencies. Commission on Audit, Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Department of Education. (2021). DepEd Order No. 041, s. 2021: Guidelines on the implementation of school-based financial management reforms. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ferry, L., & Ahrens, T. (2022). Accountability and transparency in public sector organizations: A review and research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ferry, L., & Ahrens, T. (2022). Using management control to understand public sector accountability. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2022). COVID-19 and school leadership: Crisis and resilience. School Leadership & Management, 42(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2030000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2022). Leading schools in uncertain times: The role of leadership in educational sustainability. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 735–752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lodge, M., & Mennicken, A. (2022). Accounting and accountability in public administration: Regulatory reforms and institutional change. Regulation & Governance, 16(3), 678–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lodge, M., & Mennicken, A. (2022). The audit explosion and its implications for governance. Public Administration, 100(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2021). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2021). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Naim, M., Rahman, M., & Hossain, A. (2024). Resource dependency and organizational sustainability in educational institutions. International Journal of Educational Research, 118, 102145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Naim, M., Rahman, M., & Khan, S. (2024). Financial sustainability challenges in private educational institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 345–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Nguyen, T., Pham, L., & Tran, H. (2023). Financial governance and leadership in private educational institutions. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(4), 456–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Nguyen, T. T., Tran, H. T., & Pham, L. T. (2023). Financial management practices in education: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Education Finance, 48(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2023.0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Poole, W., & Hellstén, M. (2023). Governance and accountability in education: Contemporary perspectives. Journal of Educational Change, 24(2), 201–220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Poole, W., & Hellstén, M. (2023). Educational accountability and leadership under pressure. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-2022-0000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Power, M. (2021). The audit society revisited. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 90, 101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Power, M. (2021). The audit society revisited. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92, 101251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Reichborn-Kjennerud, K., & Vabo, S. I. (2022). Performance auditing and accountability relationships in public sector governance. Public Administration, 100(3), 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Reichborn-Kjennerud, K., & Vabo, S. I. (2022). Performance auditing and public sector accountability. Evaluation, 28(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890211000000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2022). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modeling analysis of driving and impeding factors. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2022). Digital government transformation: A structural equation model. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101600 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Tran, Q., & Pham, T. (2024). Financial management practices in small private schools: Adaptive strategies for sustainability. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(1), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Tran, V. T., & Pham, H. Q. (2024). Resource dependency and financial decision-making in private schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09800-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2021). Accountability and datafication in education systems. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2022). Global education policy and governance: Accountability and market-oriented reforms. Comparative Education Review, 66(3), 345–368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Verger, A., Zancajo, A., & Fontdevila, C. (2022). Market-based reforms and educational governance. World Development, 150, 105708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105708 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Xu, X., Li, Y., & Wang, Q. (2024). Financial management efficiency in private institutions. Sustainability, 16(3), 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Xu, Y., Zhang, L., & Chen, J. (2024). Financial sustainability and strategic resource allocation in education organizations. Sustainability, 16(3), 1452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Yan, H. (2025). Adaptive leadership and financial resilience in education systems. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 33(12), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Yan, H. (2025). Financial constraints and organizational innovation in education. Educational Research Review, 38, 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Zancajo, A., & Bonal, X. (2022). Market dynamics and governance in education systems. Educational Review, 74(4), 589–606. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Zancajo, A., & Bonal, X. (2022). Private schooling and educational inequality. Comparative Education, 58(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2021.2000000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
- No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
- Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
- Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
- Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya