Nudging and Financial Literacy: A Behavioral and Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decision-Making

Authors

Kulkit Yadav

Assistant Professor, Department of Management (UG), Shri Vaishnav Institute of Management & Science, Indore (India)

Subodh Puntambekar

Assistant Professor, Department of Management (UG), Shri Vaishnav Institute of Management & Science, Indore (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000185

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 2538-2545

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-22

Accepted: 2026-07-27

Published: 2026-08-06

Abstract

Financial literacy is considered a critical determinant of individual financial well-being. However, traditional financial education programs often fail to translate knowledge into actual behavioral change. Behavioral economics offers an alternative approach through nudging, which subtly influences decision-making without restricting freedom of choice. This study examines the impact of nudging interventions on financial behavior using quantitative analysis, factor analysis, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Primary data were collected from 210 respondents through a structured questionnaire. Statistical techniques including correlation, regression, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and SEM were employed. The findings reveal that nudging interventions significantly improve savings behavior, investment participation, and budgeting discipline. The study concludes that combining behavioral interventions with financial literacy initiatives can substantially enhance financial decision-making.

Keywords

Nudging, Financial Literacy, Behavioral Economics, Savings Behavior, SEM, Financial Decision-Making, India

Downloads

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2004). Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), S164–S187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bernheim, B. D. (1995). Do households appreciate their financial vulnerabilities? Journal of Public Economics, 89(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Browning, M., & Lusardi, A. (1996). Household saving: Micro theories and micro facts. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(4), 1797–1855. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Campbell, J. Y. (2006). Household finance. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1553–1604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2004). For better or worse: Default effects and retirement savings behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 81–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fernandes, D., Lynch, J., & Netemeyer, R. (2014). Financial literacy and financial education. Management Science, 60(8), 1861–1883. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hilgert, M., Hogarth, J., & Beverly, S. (2003). Household financial management. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 89(7), 309–322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Klapper, L., Lusardi, A., & van Oudheusden, P. (2015). Financial literacy around the world. Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Loibl, C., & Hira, T. K. (2007). Self-directed financial learning. Financial Services Review, 16(1), 59–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Madrian, B., & Shea, D. (2001). The power of suggestion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mullainathan, S., & Thaler, R. (2000). Behavioral economics. International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. OECD. (2021). OECD/INFE financial literacy report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Reserve Bank of India. (2020). National strategy for financial education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338(6107), 682–685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why nudge? Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Bank. (2019). Behavioral insights for financial inclusion. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Xiao, J. J., & O’Neill, B. (2016). Consumer financial education and financial capability. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(6), 712–721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yoong, J. (2011). Financial illiteracy and stock market participation. Pension Research Council Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhang, Y., & Chatterjee, S. (2020). Financial literacy and responsible financial behavior. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 31(2), 250–265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zhou, L., & Xu, J. (2021). Digital nudging and financial technology adoption. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 22(3), 311–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles