Optimization of Hard Protein Corona Isolation on Quantum Dots Using Dynamic Light Scattering and Zeta Potential Analysis

The adsorption of biomolecules onto nanoparticle surfaces results in the formation of a protein corona, which governs the biological identity and fate of nanoparticles in physiological environments. Accurate isolation of the hard protein corona is essential for understanding nanoparticle–cell interactions and improving nanomedicine design. This study optimized experimental conditions for hard protein corona isolation from graphene and silicon-based quantum dots (QDs) using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measurements. QDs were incubated with multiple biological media, including cancer cell culture media, patient-derived organoid (PDO) media, and serum-containing solutions for periods ranging from 1 to 24 h. Following incubation, protein-coated nanoparticles were isolated using gentle centrifugation and characterized by DLS to determine hydrodynamic diameter and surface charge. Increasing incubation time generally promoted protein adsorption, resulting in larger hydrodynamic diameters and reduced surface charge. The most stable corona was obtained after 6–12 h of incubation, whereas prolonged incubation beyond 12 h resulted in plateauing or slight reductions in particle size, suggesting protein exchange or aggregation. Graphene QDs exhibited more reproducible protein corona formation than silicon QDs, indicating that nanoparticle surface chemistry significantly influences corona evolution. The optimized protocol provides a reproducible strategy for isolating hard protein coronas suitable for downstream proteomic characterization and biological evaluation.

Protein corona, Quantum dots, Dynamic light scattering, Zeta potential, Nanomedicine

1. Zhang XD, Luo Z, Chen J, Song SS, Yuan X, Shen X, et al. Enhancing quantum dot accumulation in tumor tissue by targeting the biotin receptor. Nanotechnology. 2011;22(27):275102. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Monopoli MP, Åberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nature Nanotechnology. 2012;7(12):779–786. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Mahmoudi M, Bertrand N, Zope H, Farokhzad OC. Emerging understanding of the protein corona at the nano-bio interfaces. Nano Today. 2016;11(6):817–832. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2016.10.005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Docter D, Strieth S, Westmeier D, Hayden O, Gao M, Knauer SK, et al. No king without a crown – Impact of the nanomaterial-protein corona on nanobiomedicine. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2018;14(1):33–41. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2017.11.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Resch-Genger U, Grabolle M, Cavaliere-Jaricot S, Nitschke R, Nann T. Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nature Methods. 2008;5(9):763–775. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Medintz IL, Uyeda HT, Goldman ER, Mattoussi H. Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing. Nature Materials. 2005;4(6):435–446. doi:10.1038/nmat1390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bruchez M Jr, Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP. Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. Science. 1998;281(5385):2013–2016. doi:10.1126/science.281.5385.2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggård T, Thulin E, Nilsson H, et al. Understanding the nanoparticle–protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(7):2050–2055. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608582104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Tenzer S, Docter D, Kuharev J, Musyanovych A, Fetz V, Hecht R, et al. Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. Nature Nanotechnology. 2013;8(10):772–781. doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Walkey CD, Chan WCW. Understanding and controlling the interaction of nanomaterials with proteins in a physiological environment. Chemical Society Reviews. 2012;41(7):2780–2799. doi:10.1039/C1CS15233E. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Elia G, Lynch I, Cedervall T, Dawson KA. Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(38):14265–14270. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805135105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hadjidemetriou M, Kostarelos K. Nanomedicine: Evolution of the nanoparticle corona. Nature Nanotechnology. 2017;12(4):288–290. doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zhang H, Burnum-Johnson KE, Berry KA, Zhu Z, Davis TN, Kim Y. Quantifying nanoparticle–protein interactions using dynamic light scattering and zeta potential analysis. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2019;(145):e59186. doi:10.3791/59186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bhattacharjee S. DLS and zeta potential – What they are and what they are not? Journal of Controlled Release. 2016;235:337–351. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WCW. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2012;14:1–16. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ke PC, Lin S, Parak WJ, Davis TP, Caruso F. A decade of the protein corona. ACS Nano. 2017;11(12):11773–11776. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b08008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lara S, Perez-Potti A, Herda LM, Adumeau P, Dawson KA, Yan Y. Differential recognition of nanoparticle protein corona and modified low-density lipoprotein by macrophage receptor with collagenous structure. ACS Nano. 2017;11(2):1884–1893. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b07933. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ritz S, Schöttler S, Kotman N, Baier G, Musyanovych A, Kuharev J, et al. Protein corona of nanoparticles: Distinct proteins regulate the cellular uptake. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(4):1311–1321. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ge C, Du J, Zhao L, Wang L, Liu Y, Li D, et al. Binding of blood proteins to carbon nanotubes reduces cytotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(41):16968–16973. doi:10.1073/pnas.1105270108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fleischer CC, Payne CK. Nanoparticle–cell interactions: Molecular structure of the protein corona and cellular outcomes. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2014;47(8):2651–2659. doi:10.1021/ar500190q. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
• IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
• Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
• Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
• Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach