Overseas Experience and Value Changes in Malaysian Students

Individuals’ experiences in adapting to their environments and the demands arising from them are believed to be capable of shaping, to varying degrees, human perspectives on various matters, including personal values. Values are important entities that guide human life. University students are no exception, as they have been reported to undergo significant value changes influenced by the inherently challenging experiences encountered in higher education institutions. Based on this premise, the present study was conducted to examine whether value change functions as an outcome of overseas learning experiences.This study involved a total of 605 students who were pursuing their studies at either overseas or local universities. A set of questionnaire, comprising participants’ demographic background and Schwartz’s Short Value Scale, consisting of 10 items measuring both “value importance” and “value satisfaction,” was administered at Time 1 and Time 2. The findings revealed that both the importance and satisfaction of embeddedness values remained unchanged and were not associated with overseas study experiences. In contrast, self-transcendence values showed a declining trend over time, which simultaneously suggests that self-enhancement values began to exert a stronger influence on these students. The results of this study indicate that embeddedness values are deeply embedded in the psyche of Malaysians, regardless of whether they have studied abroad or remained in their home country. Meanwhile, self-enhancement values are considered highly significant in facilitating the internalization of academic cultural principles within the demanding context of higher education. Overall, the findings highlight the complex interplay between cultural values and educational experiences, particularly in challenging academic environments.

Personal values; Value importance; Value satisfaction; Malaysian students

1. Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bardi, A., Buchanan, K.E., Goodwin, R., Slabu, L., & Robinson, M. (2014). Value stability and change during self-chosen life transitions: Self-selection Versus Socialization Effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 131-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bardi, A. & Goodwin, R. (2011). The dual route to value change: Individual processes and cultural moderators. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 42(2), 271-287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bardi, A., Lee, J.A., Hofmann-Towfigh, N., & Soutar, G. (2009). The structure of intra-individual value change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 913-929. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Berry, J.W.(1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., & Eisenberg, N. (2011). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. September 26. Advance online publication. Doi: 10.1037/a0025626. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Holmes, T.H. & Rahe, R.H.(1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2). 213-221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lee, J.A., Soutar, G.N., & Louviere, J.J. (2008). An Alternative Approach to Measuring Schwartz's Values: The Best-Worst Scaling Approach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90 (4), 335-347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lindemann, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring values with the Short Schwartz’s Value [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2), 170-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rogers, C. R. (1964). Toward a modern approach to values: The valuing process in the mature person. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 68, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 85-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Schwartz, S.H., Lehmann, A., & Roccas, S. (1999). Multimethod probes of basic human values. In J. Adamopoulos & Y. Kashima (Eds.), Social Psychology and Culture Context: Essays in Honor of Harry C. Triandis (pp. 107-123). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sheldon, K.M. (2005). Positive value change during college: Normative trends and individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 209-223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sheldon, K.M. & Kasser, T. (2001). Getting older, getting better? Personal strivings and personality development across the life-course. Developmental Psychology, 37, 491-501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shoham, A., Florenthal, B., Rose, G.M., & Kropp, F. (1998). Differences in value importance: The impact of age and gender in the Israel population. Advances in Consumer research, 25, 468-474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being