Performance Evaluation of Concrete Using GGBS and Silica Fume as Partial Cement Replacements

Authors

Vakati Radha Krishna

Department of Civil Engineering, Geethanjali Institute of Science and Technology, SPSR Nellore (India)

D Pavan Kumar

Department of Civil Engineering, Geethanjali Institute of Science and Technology, SPSR Nellore (India)

P. Revanth

Department of Civil Engineering, Geethanjali Institute of Science and Technology, SPSR Nellore (India)

SK. Shakeer Basha

Department of Civil Engineering, Geethanjali Institute of Science and Technology, SPSR Nellore (India)

P. Narendra

Department of Civil Engineering, Geethanjali Institute of Science and Technology, SPSR Nellore (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.130200119

Subject Category: Civil Engineering

Volume/Issue: 13/2 | Page No: 1324-1332

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-17

Accepted: 2026-01-26

Published: 2026-03-09

Abstract

The escalating cost of cement poses significant barriers to affordable construction, limiting access for individuals and smaller entities beyond governments and affluent sectors. This study explores sustainable alternatives by investigating the compressive strength properties of high-performance M50 grade concrete incorporating Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and silica fume (SF) as partial cement replacements. Three distinct concrete mixtures were developed with GGBS replacement levels of 0%, 10%, 15% & 20% by weight of cement, combined with SF additions of 0%, 15%, 20% & 25%. Concrete cubes were cast, compacted, and cured in a controlled tank environment for 7, 28 and 56 days. Post-curing, specimens underwent density determination followed by compressive strength testing at each interval to evaluate early-age and long-term performance. Incorporating these pozzolanic materials reduces cement demand by up to 35%, lowering production costs, minimizing CO₂ emissions, and promoting resource efficiency. This approach fosters sustainability in the construction industry, enabling economic viability for broader infrastructure development while maintaining structural integrity. Future work could extend to flexural, tensile, and durability assessments under varied exposure conditions.

Keywords

Durability, GGBS, High performance Concrete, Silica Fume/Micro Silica

Downloads

References

1. Mehta, P.K., 1986. Concrete: Structure, Properties and Materials. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Neville, A.M., 2011. Properties of Concrete, 5th ed. Pearson Education Limited, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. ACI Committee 233, 2017. Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag as a Cementitious Constituent in Concrete (ACI 233R-17). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hogan, F.J., Meusel, J.W., 1981. Evaluation for durability and strength development of a ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 3(1), pp.40–52. DOI: 10.1520/CCA10353J [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Escalante-García, J.I., Sharp, J.H., 2001. The microstructure and mechanical properties of blended cements hydrated at various temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(5), pp.695–702. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00486-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Song, H.W., Saraswathy, V., 2006. Studies on the corrosion resistance of reinforced steel in concrete with ground granulated blast-furnace slag—An overview. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 138(2), pp.226–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shi, C., Qian, J., 2000. High performance cementing materials from industrial slags — A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 29(3), pp.195–207. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00060-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Atiş, C.D., 2003. High-volume fly ash concrete with high strength and low drying shrinkage. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 15(2), pp.153–156. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:2(153) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. ACI Committee 234, 2012. Guide for the Use of Silica Fume in Concrete (ACI 234R-06). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bhanja, S., Sengupta, B., 2005. Influence of silica fume on the tensile strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(4), pp.743–747. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.009Mazloom, M., Ramezanianpour, A.A., Brooks, J.J., 2004. Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 26(4), pp.347–357. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00046-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bentz, D.P., 2000. Influence of silica fume on diffusion in cement-based materials. Cement and Concrete Composites, 22(5), pp.327–336. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00028-8\ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Toutanji, H.A., El-Korchi, T., 1995. The influence of silica fume on the compressive strength of cement paste and mortar. Cement and Concrete Research, 25(7), pp.1591–1602. DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00067-O [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khatri, R.P., Sirivivatnanon, V., 1995. Effect of different supplementary cementitious materials on mechanical properties of high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 25(1), pp.209–220. DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)00166-U [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Berke, N.S., Hicks, M.C., 1994. Predicting chloride profiles in concrete. Corrosion, 50(3), pp.234–239. DOI: 10.5006/1.3292920 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Aïtcin, P.C., 2000. High Performance Concrete. E & FN Spon, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Thomas, M.D.A., Bamforth, P.B., 1999. Modelling chloride diffusion in concrete: Effect of fly ash and slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(4), pp.487–495. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00212-9 Langan, B.W., Weng, K., Ward, M.A., 2002. Effect of silica fume and fly ash on heat of hydration of Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(7), pp.1045–1051. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00728-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Yazici, H., 2008. The effect of silica fume and high-volume Class C fly ash on mechanical properties, chloride penetration and freeze–thaw resistance of self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 22(4), pp.456–462. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gonen, T., Yazıcıoğlu, S., 2007. The influence of compaction pores on sorptivity and carbonation of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 21(5), pp.1040–1045. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.04.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dinakar, P., Sethy, K.P., Sahoo, U.C., 2013. Design of self-compacting concrete with ground granulated blast furnace slag. Materials & Design, 43, pp.161–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Siddique, R., Khan, M.I., 2011. Supplementary Cementing Materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17372-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles