Pink Tax: The Hidden Cost of Being a Woman
Authors
Temporary Assistant Professor, Department of Rural Studies Veer Narmad South Gujarat University (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000149
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 2087-2095
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-20
Accepted: 2026-07-25
Published: 2026-08-04
Abstract
The “pink tax” is the everyday, unofficial habit of charging more for products and services aimed at women than for near-identical versions aimed at men. This paper looks at that pattern from two angles — the international evidence base and the specific situation in India — and asks what mechanisms drive it, how big it actually is, and what it costs women over time. Drawing on the 2015 New York City Department of Consumer Affairs study, more recent Indian survey research, and dermatology and marketing literature published between 2022 and 2025, the picture that emerges is real but uneven: women pay measurably more in some product categories and not in others, and the size of the gap depends heavily on which category, country, and dataset you are looking at. In India, where the gender pay gap sits near 19%, even a modest consumption-side premium compounds an existing income disadvantage. The paper walks through documented premiums in razors, salon services, and personal care items, and traces how gendered marketing normalizes these differences rather than justifying them on cost grounds. It also surveys the regulatory responses that exist so far — California's Gender Tax Repeal Act, the UK's and Australia's removal of tax on menstrual products, and India's 2018 GST exemption on sanitary napkins — while noting how thin consumer protection remains outside a handful of narrow categories. The paper closes with practical suggestions for consumers, businesses, regulators, and researchers, on the view that gender equity claims ring hollow if they stop at the office door and never reach the checkout counter.
Keywords
pink tax, gender-based pricing, consumer inequality, gender pay gap, marketplace discrimination
Downloads
References
1. Biswas, S., Parvathi, G. S., Misra, P., & Kamath, B. J. (2024). Attitude towards pink tax in the Indian population: A gender-based analysis. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 12(4), 979–989. https://doi.org/10.25215/1204.090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Choudhary, S. (2025). The cost of being a woman: Unpacking the pink tax in India. International Journal of Applied Research in Economics & Social Management, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.56025/IJARESM.2025.1301251855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress. (2016). The pink tax: How gender-based pricing hurts women's buying power. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/8a42df04-8b6d-4949-b20b-6f40a326db9e/the-pink-tax---how-gender-based-pricing-hurts-women-s-buying-power.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Meena, S. (2019). Pink tax: Women's tax for being a woman! Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 5(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.3.30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Moshary, S., Tuchman, A., & Bhatia, N. (2023). Gender-based pricing in consumer packaged goods: A pink tax? Marketing Science, 45(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.1452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. (2015). From cradle to cane: The cost of being a female consumer. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/dca/downloads/pdf/partners/Study-of-Gender-Pricing-in-NYC.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ong, M. M., Alladeen, A., Khan, N., Ohan, R., & Lipner, S. R. (2025). The pink tax: Gender-based cost disparities of topical minoxidil. International Journal of Women's Dermatology, 11(3), e213. https://doi.org/10.1097/JW9.0000000000000213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Shree, M. (2023). Pink tax: A gender-based price discrimination. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 6(3), 2501–2505. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.115107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Wang, S. (2025). The pink tax and gender equality: Structural contradictions and institutional reconciliation in socioeconomic systems. Advances in Social Behavior Research, 16(4), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/2025.24280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Wishart, G., Poo, M. C.-P., Baxter, K., & Lau, Y.-Y. (2024). The "pink tax" and gender price disparity in personal care. Encyclopedia, 4(3), 1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4030083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria