Plant Awareness, Plant Awareness Disparity (PAD), and Plant Literacy in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review as a Basis for a Contextualized-DepEd Intervention

The issue of Plant Awareness Disparity (PAD) has remained a significant problem in the field of secondary science education due to the natural complexity of plant processes, textbook-heavy instruction, and prevailing zoocentrism. This systematic review aims to identify factors influencing students' awareness, interest, and understanding of plants; explore effective educational interventions; and analyze common themes in biodiversity and botany education. This is to contribute towards the formulation of a contextualized intervention for the Department of Education (DepEd) while attempting to increase plant awareness and resolve plant blindness. Using PRISMA framework a comprehensive database search was conducted in ERIC, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Semantic Scholar, and Google Scholar. Out of 619 records retrieved from databases and snowballing, 592 were excluded based on predefined criteria. Moreover, 27 studies were found to be eligible to synthesize common themes. The findings reveal that overcoming PAD requires active learning, thereby supporting the implementation of a hybrid, local, and experience-based approach aligned with the competencies of the DepEd. The review highlights that for successful implementation, botany education for teachers and a multidisciplinary diagnostic method are necessary to develop 21st-century skills and environmental stewardship.

Plant Awareness, Plant Blindness, Plant Awareness Disparity

1. Adamkova, R., & Kubiatko, M. (2025). Research Studies about “Plant Blindness” from 1999 to 2024: A Literature Review Study. Educational Point, 2(2), e135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anggraeni, N. R., Sriyati, S., & Amprasto. (2021, March). Making teaching materials by utilizing the Cibodas Botanical Garden in an effort to improve plant literacy and classification skills of high school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012154). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Asad, F., & Kramer, A. (2024, October). Influence of practical work experience on biology academic performance in senior secondary schools of Yenagoa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bakar, F., Avan, Ç., Şeker, F., & Aydınlı, B. (2020). Plant and animal awareness in nature education perspectives: Where is blindness?. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10(2), 122-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brcáková, T., Ryplová, R., & Mrkvicka, T. (2025). The Connection between Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Plant Awareness in Relation to Understanding the Cooling Functions of Vegetation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(6), 1061-1077. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bunnaen, W., Yatniyon, O., Peebkhunthod, T., Appamaraka, S., Wongchantra, P., Phothibat, P., ... & Intasena, A. (2025). The Learning Center Development to Create Knowledge, Awareness and Appreciation Value of Medicinal Plants in Mahasarakham University Demonstration School (Secondary). Journal of Education and Learning, 14(4), 404-411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, M. J., Holman, J., Francis-Jones, N., & Burmester, L. (1988). Concepts of intelligence of primary school, high schooland college students. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(1), 71-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Diana, S., Mukhoyyaroh, Q., Amprasto, A., & Hidayat, T. (2020, April). Applying phenetics approach to improve 21st century student plant literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1521, No. 4, p. 042007). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dias, C. P., do Nascimento, Y. N., & da Silva Aparício, W. C. (2023). Conhecimento Etnobotânico de Alunos do 2º ano do Ensino Médio de uma Escola Pública do Estado do Amapá. Revista de Ensino, Educação e Ciências Humanas, 24(2), 315-321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dietrich, L., Dittert, J., Biestek, L., Konnemann, C., & Asshoff, R. (2026). Investigating plant awareness: Image composition affects student perceptions of flora and fauna. Plants, People, Planet, 8(2), 611-625. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eneng Sururiyatul Mu’aziyah, S., Edy Nurtamam, M., & Nurmegawati, L. (2025). Mapping secondary school students’ botanical literacy using rasch analysis to support deep learning in science. In EPJ Web of Conferences (Vol. 344, p. 01038). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eugenio-Gozalbo, M., Aragón, L., & Ortega-Cubero, I. (2020). Gardens as science learning contexts across educational stages: Learning assessment based on students’ graphic representations. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 2226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fardhani, I., Nurlaily, F. R., Hanifah, H. N., Ifada, A. R., & Fiel’ardh, K. Plant Awareness Profile of Junior High School Students by Grade Level and Gender. Journal of Science Learning, 8(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Finger, A., Groß, J., & Zabel, J. (2022). Plant identification in the 21st century—what possibilities do modern identification keys offer for biology lessons?. Education Sciences, 12(12), 849. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gatarira, C., Nsengimana, V., Muterampundu, J., Mukandera, A., & Habimana, O. (2026). Artificial intelligence plant classification complements dichotomous key to enhance student understanding and engagement in plant identification in Rwanda. Discover Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gonzaga-Leong-on, M. S. (2020). Implementation and evaluation of 7Es scientific inquiry through plant assay guide manual among grade 9 science, technology, and engineering (STE) junior high school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3496-3501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gonzales, D. K. P., Salic-Hairulla, M. A., & Madale, V. A. (2026). Ethnobotanical plant awareness among secondary school students of Malaybalay, Philippines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 15(1), 123-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gubo, V., & Schiffl, I. (2022). The Development of Students' Interest in and Knowledge of Botany by Means of a Workshop on Pollination and Floral Ecology. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 8(2), 262-273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jamaludin, S. A., Supriatna, N., & Ratmaningsih, N. (2024). The Influence Of Medicinal Plant Literacy Through Youtube Media On Ecological Intelligence Via The PBL Model In Social Studies Subjects (Quasi-Experiment At Mts Miftahul Huda Majalengka). Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 4(7), 6215-6227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kriemadi, E., Nikita, V. D., Krigas, N., & Bareka, P. (2026). Experiencing Biodiversity in Upper Secondary Education and Botanical Gardens Through a Novel Karyotype-Based Educational Approach Using the Genus Tulipa L. as a Model. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens, 7(1), 13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lampert, P., Müllner, B., Pany, P., Scheuch, M., & Kiehn, M. (2020). Students’ conceptions of plant reproduction processes This paper was presented at the ERIDOB conference 2020. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 213-223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J., others, & Moher, D. (2009). The prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Marcos-Walias, J., Bobo-Pinilla, J., Delgado Iglesias, J., & Reinoso Tapia, R. (2023). Plant Awareness Disparity among Students of Different Educational Levels in Spain. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 234-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. Plos Medicine, 6(7), e100009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Honmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlan, J. M., Akl, E. A.,Brennan, S. E., & Chou, R. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ, 10, Article 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pany, P., Meier, F. D., Dünser, B., Yanagida, T., Kiehn, M., & Möller, A. (2024). Measuring students’ plant awareness: A prerequisite for effective botany education. Journal of Biological Education, 58(5), 1103-1116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Parsley, K. M. (2021). Exploring new approaches to the problem of ity in undergraduate students. The University of Memphis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pham Quang, T. & Thi Huong, N. (2026). Building science learning environments based on real-world experiences and nature for preschool children. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 12(1), 192-203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Safitri, A. N., Arifin, A. Z., Sari, A. N., Permata, A. D. R. W., Ramadhan, A. N., Wahyuningsih, A., ... & Yulianti, E. EduPlant: A design thinking-developed educational kit for plant classification to enhance junior high school students' 21st century skills. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 8(3), 375-386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Salon, L., & Salic-Hairulla, M. (2025). Familiarity And Uses of Common Ethnobotanical Plants Among Young Higaonon Students: Basis for a Contextualized Stem Lesson. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM education, 2(6), 454-471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sanjaya, Y., Solihat, R., Virijai, F., Jasid, A., & Azizah, C. N. (2025). Exploration of plant literacy of high school students in Mentawai: a quantitative approach through inventory, processing, and data reporting. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 9(1), 34-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Silva, G. L., Versieux, L. M., Mezzonato-Pires, A. C., & Mattos, A. M. (2025). Dance with plants: Taylor Swift’s music videos as advance organizers for meaningful learning in botany. Annals of Botany, 136(7), 1407-1422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Stagg, B. C., & Dillon, J. (2022). Plant awareness is linked to plant relevance: A review of educational and ethnobiological literature (1998–2020). Plants, People, Planet, 4(6), 579-592. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Torres-Porras, J., Ramos-Miras, J. J., & Alcántara-Manzanares, J. (2025). The plant blindness and the humans-as-non-animals bias cycles in the educational system. The need to overcome them. Journal of Biological Education, 59(3), 518-529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (1999). Preventing plant blindness. The American biology teacher, 61(2), 82-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wulandari, S., Sunandar, A., & Setiadi, A. E. (2023). The plant blindness profile of secondary school students. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(3), 502-510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Viney, M., Huegele, I., Correa, J., Warnock, A., Kamil, P., & Boonchai, N. (2026). Fossil Forests Kits: A Hands-on Approach to Paleobotany & Paleoclimate. The American Biology Teacher, 88(2), 117-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wyner, Y., & Doherty, J. H. (2022). Caring to know a name: An examination of New York City student attitudes towards knowing a tree's name. Plants, People, Planet, 4(3), 283-302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zarate, D., Stavropoulos, V., Ball, M., de Sena Collier, G., & Jacobson, N. C. (2022). Exploring the digital footprint of depression: a PRISMA systematic literature review of the empirical evidence. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study on "Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Transformation of Indian Agriculture"
• Assessment of the Technological Suitability of the “Kepez” Grape Variety for Quality Wine Production
• Inheritance of Seedcoat Colour in Wild and Landrace Genotypes of Cowpea Grown in Bauchi, Nigeria
• Ethnobotanical Utilization and Phytochemical Investigation of the Pith of Patikan (Caryota mitis) Plant