Practice Communication Aimi Homestead Family as Effort Embodiment Resilience Food Family
Authors
Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)
Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)
Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)
Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)
Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)
Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000177
Subject Category: Communication
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 2425-2430
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-23
Accepted: 2026-07-28
Published: 2026-08-05
Abstract
Resilience food family not only determined by availability food, but also by the communication process that forms knowledge, attitudes, and behavior member family in producing managing, and consuming food. Purpose study This is For analyze practice communication family in realize resilience food family at Aimi Homestead.
Keywords
communication family, resilience food family, literacy food, education family, communication development
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth , C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. F.A.O. (2006). Food Security . Policy Brief, Issue 2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. F.A.O. (2023). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20 (3), 275–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Galvin, K. M., Braithwaite, D. O., & Bylund , C. L. (2016). Family Communication: Cohesion and Change (9th ed.). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In DO Braithwaite & LA Baxter (Eds.), Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 50–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Melkote, S., & Steeves, H. (2015). Communication for Development . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Olson, D.H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22 (2), 144–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Servaes , J. (2008). Communication for development and social change. Communication Research Trends, 27 (4), 1–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Servaes , J. (2020). Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Truman, E., Lane, D., & Elliott, C. (2017). Defining food literacy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Vidgen , H. A., & Gallegos, D. (2014). Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite, 76 , 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
- An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
- Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
- Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
- (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication