Preservation of Cultural Heritage Tourism in Sta. Maria, Ilocos Sur

This study explores the cultural heritage tourism landscape of Sta. Maria, Ilocos Sur, focusing on the delicate balance between preservation and economic growth. Sta. Maria, a UNESCO World Heritage town, is home to historic landmarks such as the Sta. Maria Church and natural attractions like Pinsal Falls, making it a potential hub for sustainable tourism. The objective of the study was to assess how tourism-related policies and stakeholder involvement contribute to balancing heritage conservation with local economic development.
The research utilized a descriptive-correlational quantitative method, employing validated survey questionnaires distributed to local residents, tourists, LGU representatives, and tourism officers. The study investigated respondents’ demographic profiles, types of attractions, transportation availability, needed policies, levels of implementation, and economic impacts. Statistical tools such as frequency distribution, mean computation, and correlation coefficient analysis were applied.
Findings revealed that heritage site management, community involvement, and preservation policies are implemented at a very high level. Respondents identified the urgent need for policies regulating environmental impact, infrastructure development, tourist behavior, and cultural preservation. Strong positive correlations were observed between the implementation of these policies and the achievement of both preservation goals and economic benefits, including increased employment and business opportunities.
The study concludes that Sta. Maria has successfully integrated sustainable tourism practices into its governance and community structures. It recommends that local communities empower the training and livelihood opportunities, enforce the regulations and encourage infrastructure projects that support tourism without compromising heritage integrity Through collaborative efforts and strategic planning, the town effectively protects its cultural assets while fostering economic opportunities for its residents. This research highlights the importance of continuous policy evaluation and community participation in maintaining this balance.

Cultural Heritage Tourism, Preservation, Level of Implementation, Heritage Site Management

1. Acabado, S., & Martin, M. (2020). Decolonizing the past, empowering the future: Community-led heritage conservation in Ifugao, Philippines. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 7(3), 171-186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adriano, L. (2025, August 15). Ilocos Sur church's declaration as minor basilica set. Philippine News Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Avrami, E., Macdonald, S., Mason, R., & Myers, D. (2019). Values in heritage management: Emerging approaches and research directions. Getty Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Besmonte, E. L. (2022). Identification and safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) of Tabaco City, Philippines, through cultural mapping. Journal of Education, Management and Developmental Studies, 2(2), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blake, J. (2018). Further reflections on community involvement in safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. In Safeguarding intangible heritage (pp. 17-35). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Caruyan, H. M. (2024). Destination competitiveness of Santiago, Ilocos Sur (Unpublished thesis). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ferrer, E. M., & Polotan-dela Cruz, L. (Eds.). (1996). Seeds of hope: A collection of case studies on community-based coastal resources management in the Philippines. University of the Philippines College of Social Work and Community Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Habiba, M., & Lina, F. Y. (2023). Community-based tourism (CBT): A community development tool. Development, 15(17). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Harrison, R., DeSilvey, C., Holtorf, C., Schiphorst, S., Bartolini, N., Breithoff, E., ... & Penrose, S. (2020). Heritage futures: Comparative approaches to natural and cultural heritage practices. UCL Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Heritage tourism through market innovation and technology integration. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2015). Older adults’ adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 747–759. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Macdonald, S., & Cheong, C. (2014). The role of public-private partnerships and the third sector in conserving heritage buildings, sites, and historic urban areas. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pew Research Center. (2023). Internet and technology use by generation. Pew Research Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pratama, A. D., Budiyanto, M. N., & Aryansah, J. E. (2022). Analysis of cultural heritage management by the Palembang City Culture Office. Indonesian Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 1(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Robinson, M., & Smith, M. (2018). Politics, power, and play: The shifting contexts of cultural tourism. In Cultural tourism in a changing world: Politics, participation and (re)presentation (pp. 1-16). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Su, M. M., & Wall, G. (2020). Community participation in tourism: A critical review and conceptual framework. Tourism Review, 75(1), 28–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. (2006). Heritage tourism in the 21st century: Valued traditions and new perspectives. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 1(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. United Nations World Tourism Organization. (2019). World tourism organization report on cultural tourism. Madrid: UNWTO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Health Organization. (2022). Global report on ageism. Geneva: WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Tourism Organization. (2018). Cultural tourism growth report. Geneva: WTO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits