Reconceptualizing Higher Education Preparedness for Industry 5.0: Insights from a Structured Literature Review

The rise of Industry 5.0 has moved the trajectory of industrial transformation from technology efficiency to human-centricity, sustainability and resilience. This paradigm change poses major difficulties and opportunities for higher education institutions (HEIs) which are increasingly expected to educate future-ready graduates with technical, ethical and multidisciplinary competencies. While there is increasing academic interest in Industry 5.0, the existing research on higher education preparedness is fragmented, with a majority of the studies focusing on digital readiness and technical adoption, but neglecting the wider institutional factors. To fill this gap, the current study reports a comprehensive literature evaluation synthesizing and integrating the extant knowledge on higher education preparedness for Industry 5.0. Relevant material between 2018 and 2025 was thoroughly found and examined from key academic databases and policy sources. Thematic synthesis yielded six core dimensions of preparedness: technological and digital preparedness, human capital and faculty readiness, curriculum and pedagogical transformation, organizational and leadership readiness, industry-academia collaboration, and institutional and policy support. This study proposes a multidimensional conceptual framework drawing from Human Capital Theory, Sociotechnical Systems Theory, Dynamic Capability Theory, and Institutional Theory that redefines preparedness as an integrated institutional capability rather than a set of separate readiness indicators. The approach also situates these factors within the Indian higher education setting and highlights how policy environments, institutional diversity and resource restrictions influence readiness outcomes. This study contributes to the burgeoning discourse on Industry 5.0 by giving a holistic view of the transition of higher education and setting a framework for future empirical research, policy formulation, and institutional strategy creation.

NA

1. Agarwal, P. (2018). Indian higher education: Envisioning the future. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Muitaba, G., Amin, M. S., & Whangbo, T. (2023). Education 5.0: Requirements, enabling technologies, and future directions. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alharbi, A. M. (2023). Implementation of Education 5.0 in developed and developing countries: A comparative study. Creative Education, 14(5), 914–942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Briken, K., Moore, S., Scholarios, D., Rose, E., & Sherlock, A. (2023). Industry 5 and the human in human-centred manufacturing. Sensors, 23(14), Article 6416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Hein-Pensel, F., Schero, E., Winkler, H., & Jabs, J. (2025). Assessing Industry 5.0 readiness: Prototype of a holistic digital index to evaluate sustainability, resilience and human-centered factors. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 5(1), Article 100329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), 3445–3471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chaka, C. (2020). Higher education institutions and the use of emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00221-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Corvello, V., Felicetti, A. M., Steiber, A., & Alänge, S. (2022). Transitioning towards Industry 5.0: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(6), 1190–1212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Demartini, M., & Benussi, L. (2017). Do Web 4.0 and Industry 4.0 imply Education X.0? IT Professional, 19(3), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2017.42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. EDUCAUSE. (2024). 2024 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and learning edition. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2024/5/2024-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. European Commission. (2020). A new industrial strategy for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. European Commission. (2022). Industry 5.0: A transformative vision for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fischer, M., Imgrund, F., Janiesch, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2020). Strategy archetypes for digital transformation. Information & Management, 57(5), 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and sustainability. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.04.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Government of India. (2020). National education policy 2020. Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Huang, S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zheng, P., Mourtzis, D., & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, retrospection and prospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jackson, D. (2016). Modelling graduate skill transfer. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1137887 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Acatech. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lantada, A. D. (2020). Engineering education 5.0: Continuously evolving engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(6), 1814–1832. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2023). Ethical and value-oriented engineering in Industry 5.0. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility. Oxford Review of Education, 44(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1454332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2022). A literature review of the challenges and opportunities of the transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0. Energies, 15(17), 6276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. OECD. (2021). OECD education policy perspectives. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5a96bb79-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pfeiffer, S. (2017). Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans. AI & Society, 32, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0655-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Potočan, V., Mulej, M., & Nedelko, Z. (2021). Society 5.0. Kybernetes, 50(3), 794–811. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Romero, D., Stahre, J., Taisch, M., & Wuest, T. (2022). Towards a human-centred reference architecture for Industry 5.0. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 36, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.07.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tilak, J. B. G. (2020). Reforms in higher education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(9), 38–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study