Regional Disintegration a Comparative Perspective: Brexit and Sahelexit

This article examines why two different political systems which are, the United Kingdom and the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) both chose to exit their respective regional blocs. Drawing on neo-functionalist spillback theory and post-functionalist identity frameworks, it employs a Most Different Systems Design (MDSD) to compare Brexit (2016–2020) and the AES withdrawal from ECOWAS (2024–2025). Despite pronounced differences in governance type, economic capacity, geographic position, and institutional context, both exits were preceded by elite perceptions that continued membership-imposed costs on sovereignty and security that outweighed the benefits of integration. This study argues that similar exit logics can recur across vastly different systems when ruling elites conclude that a regional bloc has become an obstacle rather than an asset to state survival. The findings suggest that neo-functionalist spillback, when combined with post-functionalist attention to domestic identity politics, offers a more complete account of regional exit than either framework provides alone, and points toward a comparative research agenda on the conditions under which disintegration becomes the rational political choice.

regional disintegration, neo-functionalism, spillback, Brexit, ECOWAS, Alliance of Sahel States, comparative regionalism, sovereignty

1. Acho, G. A. (2024). The Alliance of Sahel States and ECOWAS: Withdrawal, sanctions, and the legitimacy crisis. Global Governance Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. De Lombaerde, P., Mattheis, F., Fonseca, C., & Martins, M. (2021). Regional disintegration: Causes, consequences and contradictions. Comentario Internacional, 21, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312549.2021.21.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dougherty, J. E., & Pfalzgraff, R. L., Jr. (2001). Contending theories of international relations: A comprehensive survey (5th ed.). Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. EBSCO Research Starters. (n.d.). Sahel region (Africa). EBSCO. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/earth-and-atmospheric-sciences/sahel-region-africa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Estevens, J. (2018). Migration crisis in the EU: developing a framework for analysis of national security and defence strategies. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0093-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fabbrini, S., & Zgaga, T. (2024). Right-wing sovereignism in the European Union: Definition, features and implications. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(2), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Frankema, E., Hillbom, E., Kufakurinani, U., & Meier zu Selhausen, F. (Eds.). (2023). The history of African development: A textbook for a new generation of African students and Teachers. African Economic History Network. https://doi.org/10.18174/590864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Haas, E. B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces 1950–1957. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A post-functionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science. 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Institute for Economics & Peace. (2024). Global Terrorism Index 2024: Measuring the impact of terrorism. https://www.economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/GTI-2024-web-290224. Pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Monetary Fund. (2026). World Economic Outlook database (April 2026 ed.). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jabbar, C. (2025, December 23). Corridors of the Alliance of Sahel States: Logistical vulnerabilities, security constraints, and adaptation dynamics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2010). Most different systems design. In Encyclopedia of case study research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nye, J. S. (1971). *Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization. Little, Brown and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oluyemi, O. A. (2025). The Cold War resurgence: A discourse on the rivalry between ECOWAS and AES in West Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and English Literature. 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55220/2576683x.v9.244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ouedraogo, Mahamadi. (2025). The AES Exit from ECOWAS and Brexit: A Comparative Reading Through Hirschman’s Exit–Voice–Loyalty Framework. Uirtus. 5. 10.59384/uirtus. dec2025n4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Princen, S., Schimmelfennig, F., Sczepanski, R., Smekal, H., & Zbiral, R. (2024). Different yet the same? Differentiated integration and flexibility in implementation in the European Union. West European Politics, 47(3), 466–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2150944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Schmitter, P. C., & Lefkofridi, Z. (2016). Neo-functionalism as a theory of disintegration. Chinese Political Science Review,1(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0012-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tainter, J. A. (1988). The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tang, Y., & Lan, G. (2023). Political factors, household income, under-five survival, and life expectancy in the Sahel region. African Journal of Reproductive Health,27(12), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i12.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. UK Government. (2023, July). UK–Sahel region development partnership summary. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vollaard, H. (2014). Explaining European disintegration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(5), 1142–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study