Reimagining Social Transformation Through Decolonial Frameworks and African Perspectives: Rethinking Security and Sustainable Peace

Authors

Kerry Muhati

PhD Candidate, Tangaza University (Kenya)

Prof. Samuel Nyanchoga

Lecturer, Institute of Social Transformation (IST) Tangaza University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900918

Subject Category: Peace and Security

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 13061-13084

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-09

Accepted: 2026-10-14

Published: 2026-10-27

Abstract

Dominant approaches to security and peacebuilding in Africa concentrate on preventing violence, stabilising the state and concluding peace agreements. These aims are significant, but they can overlook colonial legacies, African ways of knowing, and ordinary people’s understandings of safety and peace. This article asks what security and sustainable peace mean in a transformative sense, and how decolonial approaches and African perspectives can help to develop them. It uses a conceptual, literature-based method: it does not collect or analyse primary data and makes no empirical claims. The article clarifies four concepts (social transformation, security, sustainable peace and conflict transformation), critically reviews decolonial theory and both foundational and contemporary African political thought, and compares the resulting position systematically with human security, liberal peacebuilding, critical (local-turn) peacebuilding and conflict transformation. It then proposes an integrated framework with five dimensions: historical and structural analysis, epistemic justice, relational and ethical foundations, institutional transformation, and collective agency. Each dimension is defined, the interactions among the dimensions are specified (including which are necessary conditions), and the framework is expressed as an analytical model with operational definitions, causal links, moderators and five testable propositions. Its distinctive claim is that epistemic justice contributes to sustainable peace only when it is converted, through meaningful participation and accountable institutions, into legitimacy and trust, and only when rights safeguards constrain both state and customary power. The article also examines its own risks: romanticising tradition, neglecting present-day political responsibility and producing new exclusions. It ends with implications for research, policy, practice and education, and a call for comparative empirical testing across African contexts.

Keywords

Social transformation; decoloniality; African perspectives; security; sustainable peace; peacebuilding; conflict transformation; epistemic justice

Downloads

References

1. Ake, C. (1996). Democracy and development in Africa. Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Autesserre, S. (2021). The frontlines of peace: An insider’s guide to changing the world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197530351.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2019). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bhambra, G. K. (2021). Colonial global economy: Towards a theoretical reorientation of political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Biko, S. (1978). I write what I like. Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Booth, K. (1991). Security and emancipation. Review of International Studies, 17(4), 313–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cabral, A. (1973). Return to the source: Selected speeches of Amílcar Cabral. Monthly Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Charbonneau, B. (2021). Counter-insurgency governance in the Sahel. International Affairs, 97(6), 1805–1823. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Commission on Human Security. (2003). Human security now. Commission on Human Security. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth (C. Farrington, Trans.). Grove Press. (Original work published 1961) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gyekye, K. (1997). Tradition and modernity: Philosophical reflections on the African experience. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lederach, J. P. (2003). The little book of conflict transformation. Good Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mac Ginty, R. (2008). Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace. Cooperation and Conflict, 43(2), 139–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mac Ginty, R. (2021). Everyday peace: How so-called ordinary people can disrupt violent conflict. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197563397.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mazrui, A. A. (1986). The Africans: A triple heritage. BBC Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mbembe, A. (2021). Out of the dark night: Essays on decolonization. Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Menkiti, I. A. (1984). Person and community in African traditional thought. In R. A. Wright (Ed.), African philosophy: An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 171–181). University Press of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Metz, T. (2022). A relational moral theory: African ethics in and beyond the continent. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198748960.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mudimbe, V. Y. (1988). The invention of Africa: Gnosis, philosophy, and the order of knowledge. Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Murithi, T. (2006). Practical peacemaking wisdom from Africa: Reflections on Ubuntu. Journal of Pan African Studies, 1(4), 25–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Coloniality of power in postcolonial Africa: Myths of decolonization. CODESRIA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2016). The decolonial Mandela: Peace, justice and the politics of life. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785331183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism. Thomas Nelson & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nyerere, J. K. (1968). Ujamaa: Essays on socialism. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Okech, A. (2020). African feminist epistemic communities and decoloniality. Critical African Studies, 12(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2020.1810086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Oyěwùmí, O. (1997). The invention of women: Making an African sense of Western gender discourses. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Paffenholz, T. (2021). Perpetual peacebuilding: A new paradigm to move beyond the linearity of liberal peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2021.1925423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Paris, R. (2001). Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air? International Security, 26(2), 87–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Paris, R. (2010). Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies, 36(2), 337–365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Richmond, O. P. (2022). The grand design: The evolution of the international peace architecture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190850449.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Sabaratnam, M. (2017). Decolonising intervention: International statebuilding in Mozambique. Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human development report 1994: New dimensions of human security. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). 2022 special report on human security: New threats to human security in the Anthropocene: Demanding greater solidarity. https://hdr.undp.org/content/2022-special-report-human-security [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wiredu, K. (1996). Cultural universals and particulars: An African perspective. Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zartman, I. W. (Ed.). (2000). Traditional cures for modern conflicts: African conflict “medicine”. Lynne Rienner. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles