Reintegration Program for Juvenile Offenders: The Case of Panabo City

Authors

Ernesto G. Tenajeros Jr.

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Joshua A. Limbing

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Eljie Mae M. Cenia

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Estrello L. Estrebillo

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Ivy M. Acaso

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Glenne B. Lagura, DPA

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Joanaros P. Fahit, MSSW

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Ronel G. Dagohoy, DPA

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Troy Jon N. Ancho

Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Good Governance Davao del Norte State College, Panabo City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.130200185

Subject Category: Public Administration

Volume/Issue: 13/2 | Page No: 2014-2020

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-27

Accepted: 2026-03-03

Published: 2026-03-20

Abstract

This qualitative case study examined the development, implementation, and challenges of reintegration programs for juvenile offenders in Panabo City, Philippines. Through key informant interviews with five program implementers, the study explored how local government units operationalize Republic Act 9344 (Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006) through community-based rehabilitation initiatives. Using thematic analysis based on Creswell's framework, three major themes emerged: program development driven by policy alignment and multi-stakeholder collaboration; implementation through needs-based interventions and community-based strategies; and persistent challenges including resource limitations, inadequate family support, and behavioral adjustment difficulties. Findings revealed that successful reintegration requires coordinated efforts among the City Social Welfare and Development Office, Philippine National Police, Department of Social Welfare and Development, NGOs, and community stakeholders. The program's three-year structured plan emphasizes individualized interventions, vocational training, and psychosocial support. However, implementation faces significant barriers including budget constraints, limited facilities, social stigma, and emotional adjustment issues among youth participants. The study demonstrates that effective juvenile reintegration transcends punitive measures, requiring sustained commitment to rehabilitation, adequate resource allocation, and community acceptance. These findings contribute to understanding how local governments can develop responsive juvenile justice systems that balance public safety with children's rights to rehabilitation and social reintegration.

Keywords

juvenile justice; reintegration programs; children in conflict with law; community-based rehabilitation

Downloads

References

1. Alampay, E., & Elmes, C. (2023). Youth crime and rehabilitation in Philippine local governments: Challenges and innovations. Philippine Journal of Social Development, 15(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.3860/pjsd.2023.15.1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, P. (2019). Trauma-informed care in juvenile rehabilitation. Journal of Social Work Practice, 33(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2018.1504262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. City Social Welfare and Development Office. (2023). Annual report. Panabo City Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2019). Guidelines on the functionality of local councils for the protection of children. https://www.dilg.gov.ph/PDF_File/reports_resources/dilg-reportsresources-2019123-cb2bc5b6c4.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2020). Comprehensive intervention programs for children in conflict with the law. https://www.dswd.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Executive Order No. 159, Series of 2023. Strengthening the juvenile justice and welfare council of Panabo City. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council. (2019). Annual report on the implementation of the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act. https://www.jjwc.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lerner, R. M., Brentano, C., Dowling, E. M., & Anderson, P. M. (2015). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. New Directions for Youth Development, 2002(95), 11-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. McCall, D., Reyes, M., & Torres, L. (2022). Child protection systems and local governance: Constraints in Philippine LGUs. Asia-Pacific Social Work Review, 28(3), 213-227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McCombes, S. (2023). Understanding case study research design. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/case-study-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693-2698. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method (Vol. 1, pp. 9-62). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Panabo City Information Office. (2024). Youth programs and initiatives. Panabo City Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Republic Act No. 9344. (2006). Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006. Congress of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Republic Act No. 10630. (2013). An Act strengthening the Juvenile Justice System in the Philippines. Congress of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Respicio, M. R. (2021). Social stigma and reintegration challenges among juvenile offenders in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Criminology, 16(4), 377-395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Save the Children Philippines. (2015). Juvenile justice in the Philippines: Experience and best practices. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tersona, R. C., & Lagura, G. B. (2025). Servant leadership of unit heads, workplace spirituality and ethical climate: A structural equation model on public service motivation. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 9(1), 1–15. https://www.theijbmt.com/archive/0961/1434848158.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Introductory handbook on the prevention of recidivism and the social reintegration of offenders. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Veloso, D. T. M. (2015). Final report: Evaluation of the juvenile justice system in the Philippines. Save the Children. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Williams, K., & Harper, J. (2020). Supporting emotional recovery in juvenile rehabilitation programs. Social Work Perspectives, 31(4), 55-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles