Rethinking Anthropocentrism: Nature, Voice and Responsibility in Amitav Ghosh’s The Living Mountain

Authors

Dr. Ajit Konwar

Associate Professor, Department of English, Morigaon College (Autonomous) (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000209

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 2282-2282

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-27

Accepted: 2026-06-01

Published: 2026-06-10

Abstract

Amitav Ghosh’s The Living Mountain: A Fable for Our Times presents a powerful ecological allegory that challenges the anthropocentric worldview responsible for environmental degeneration. The text narrates the story of Mahaparbat, the Living Mountain, and the people who once lived in a harmonious relationship with it. Through the invasion of the Anthropoi and their extractive desire, Ghosh exposes the violence of modern development, colonial exploitation, capitalist greed, and human arrogance towards the non-human world. This paper examines how The Living Mountain rethinks anthropocentrism by granting nature agency, voice, and moral presence. It argues that Ghosh’s fable does not merely represent nature as a passive background but as a living entity with memory, power, and ethical significance. The study further explores the responsibilities of human beings towards the natural world in the age of ecological crisis. By drawing on eco-criticism, post-humanism, and de-colonial environmental thoughts, the paper shows that Ghosh’s text calls for a radical transformation of human consciousness from domination to coexistence.

Keywords

Anthropocentrism, eco-criticism, nature, voice, responsibility, post-humanism, de-colonial ecology

Downloads

References

1. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ghosh, A. (2021). The nutmeg’s curse: Parables for a planet in crisis. John Murray. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ghosh, A. (2022). The living mountain: A fable for our times. Fourth Estate India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Glotfelty, C. (1996). Introduction: Literary studies in an age of environmental crisis. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. xv–xxxvii). University of Georgia Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles