School Heads' Transformational Leadership and Innovation Culture in Public Junior High Schools in the Division of Silang, Cavite: Basis for a Localized Progress Drive Program
Authors
Graduate School- MA.Ed Program, Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science & Technology (EARIST-CAVITE) (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000101
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 1358-1372
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-15
Accepted: 2026-07-20
Published: 2026-07-30
Abstract
Educational leadership plays a vital role in fostering innovation and improving organizational effectiveness within schools. This study examined the relationship between school heads' transformational leadership and innovation culture in selected public junior high schools in the Division of Silang, Cavite. Specifically, it assessed transformational leadership in terms of idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, and innovation culture in terms of strategic initiatives, support and resources, creative behavior, and leadership culture. The study employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design involving 305 respondents, consisting of principals, department heads, teachers, and non-teaching personnel selected through purposive and simple random sampling techniques. A researcher-developed questionnaire, validated by experts and subjected to reliability testing, served as the primary data collection instrument. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including weighted mean, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, were utilized for data analysis. Findings revealed that school heads demonstrated highly evident transformational leadership practices, while innovation culture was likewise assessed as highly evident across the participating schools. No significant differences were observed among the respondents' assessments of transformational leadership, whereas a significant positive relationship existed between transformational leadership and innovation culture. The study further identified organizational challenges that influence the implementation of innovative practices. Based on these findings, a Localized PROGRESS Drive Program was developed to strengthen transformational leadership competencies and sustain an innovation-oriented school culture. The proposed intervention was evaluated by the respondents and found to be highly acceptable for implementation.
Keywords
transformational leadership, innovation culture, school leadership, educational innovation, public junior high schools, PROGRESS Drive Program
Downloads
References
1. Abu Nasra, M., & Arar, K. (2020). Leadership style and teacher performance: The mediating role of occupational perception. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(1), 186–202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akdere, M., & Egan, T. M. (2020). Transformational leadership and human resource development: Linking employee learning, job satisfaction, and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(4), 393–421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Commission on Higher Education. (2024). Higher education statistical bulletin. Commission on Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Congressional Commission on Education II. (2025). Fixing the foundations: Year Two Report. EDCOM II. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2021). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 25(2), 97–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Department of Education. (2022). Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Department of Education. (2023). Basic Education Development Plan 2030. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Department of Education. (2024). Basic Education Report 2024. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership and school improvement: Supporting educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 5–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hargreaves, A., & O'Connor, M. T. (2020). Collaborative professionalism. Corwin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Harris, A. (2020). COVID-19, school leadership, and educational change. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. International Labour Organization. (2023). Skills development and future work. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kilag, O. K. T., Malbas, M. H., Nengasca, M. K. S., Longakit, L. J. H., Celin, L. C., Pasigui, R., & Valenzona, M. A. V. N. (2024). Transformational leadership and educational innovation. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Leithwood, K. (2021). A review of evidence about equitable school leadership. Education Sciences, 11(8), 377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2020). School leadership that works. ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive research: Definition, design, methods and examples. Scribbr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. OECD. (2021). Positive, high-achieving students? What schools and teachers can do. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. OECD. (2024). Innovative learning environments. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). School leadership for quality learning. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Education statistics 2024. PSA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2023). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Schmitz, M. L., Antonietti, C., Consoli, T., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2023). Transformational leadership for technology integration in schools: Empowering teachers to use technology in a more demanding way. Computers & Education, 204, 104880. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Senge, P. M. (2020). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. ed.). Currency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. UNESCO. (2024). Technical and vocational education and training for sustainable development. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2022). School climate and student engagement: Contemporary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 57(4), 243–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. World Bank. (2022). Improving education quality through effective teaching. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. World Bank. (2023). World Development Report 2023. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. World Bank. (2024). Education systems for resilient societies. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Zhang, X. (2024). The influence of transformational leadership on innovation performance of education staff with the mediating role of innovation culture and employee motivation. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Zhao, Y. (2023). Learner-centered education in the twenty-first century. Corwin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study