Scintillator–SiPM Detection of Cosmic-Ray Muons: Physics, Detector Architectures, Coincidence Techniques, Acceptance, and the Comparability of Reported Flux and Angular Measurements
Authors
University Department of Physics, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, Bihar, India-852113 (India)
University Department of Physics, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, Bihar, India-852113 (India)
University Department of Physics, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, Bihar, India-852113 (India)
University Department of Physics, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, Bihar, India-852113 (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000068
Subject Category: Physics: Nuclear and High Energy Physics Detector
Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 928-961
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-17
Accepted: 2026-09-22
Published: 2026-10-06
Abstract
Plastic scintillators read out by silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) are now widely used in compact cosmic-ray muon telescopes, from desktop counters to square-metre muography hodoscopes. The measurements these instruments report, however, are difficult to compare: vertical intensity, integral flux, coincidence rate, and acceptance are not always distinguished, and the quantities that control them — geometric acceptance, plane efficiency, coincidence window, energy threshold, and environmental conditions — are reported inconsistently. This review is organized around that measurement chain rather than around individual instruments. It summarizes the muon physics that fixes what a surface telescope can measure, treats the scintillator and SiPM properties that set the photoelectron budget and the singles rate, classifies published detector architectures, and analyses coincidence background, acceptance, and efficiency quantitatively. Published zenith-angle exponents are then compared: acceptance-corrected tracking and pulse-charge measurements give n = 2.00 ± 0.04 (stat) ± 0.14 (syst) and 1.90 ± 0.06 (stat) ± 0.10 (syst), whereas tilt scans of wide-acceptance counting telescopes fitted directly with a cosine-power law give 1.39 ± 0.01 and 1.44 ± 0.06. A numerical acceptance calculation performed for this review, and clearly separated from literature-derived values, shows that for two square planes of width a separated by d the apparent exponent obtained from uncorrected tilt-scan rates falls from 1.99 at d/a = 10 to 1.62 at d/a = 1 and 1.28 at d/a = 0.5 when the true exponent is 2, and that forward folding the same model through the acceptance recovers the input exponent exactly. Finite acceptance can therefore account for a substantial fraction of the published spread without invoking atmospheric physics, although the geometries of the published telescopes differ from the idealization used here and no correction is derived for them. The review closes with an uncertainty framework, a minimum-reporting checklist, and an assessment of the gaps that currently limit the comparability and the imaging performance of scintillator–SiPM muon detectors.
Keywords
cosmic-ray muons, plastic scintillator, silicon photomultiplier, coincidence counting, geometric acceptance, zenith-angle distribution, muography
Downloads
References
1. S. N. Axani, K. Frankiewicz, and J. M. Conrad, “The CosmicWatch Desktop Muon Detector: a self-contained, pocket sized particle detector,” J. Instrum., vol. 13, art. P03019, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Desktop Muon Detector (v3X),” J. Instrum., vol. 20, art. P10040, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. G. Ambrosi, F. Ambrosino, R. Battiston, et al., “The MU-RAY project: volcano radiography with cosmic-ray muons,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 628, no. 1, pp. 120–123, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Aab et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), “Design, upgrade and characterization of the silicon photomultiplier front-end for the AMIGA detector at the Pierre Auger Observatory,” J. Instrum., vol. 16, art. P01026, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Niculescu-Oglinzanu, D. Stanca, A. Bălăceanu, M. Dobre, A. Gherghel-Lascu, A. Saftoiu, R. Smău, and C. Vancea, “SiRO, a scintillator-based hodoscope for muography applications,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 136, no. 17, art. 174501, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. E. P. George, “Cosmic rays measure overburden of tunnel,” Commonwealth Engineer, vol. 42, pp. 455–457, 1955. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. L. W. Alvarez, J. A. Anderson, F. El Bedwei, et al., “Search for hidden chambers in the pyramids,” Science, vol. 167, no. 3919, pp. 832–839, 1970. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. S. Procureur, “Muon imaging: principles, technologies and applications,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 878, pp. 169–179, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. G. Bonomi, P. Checchia, M. D’Errico, D. Pagano, and G. Saracino, “Applications of cosmic-ray muons,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., vol. 112, art. 103768, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lechmann, D. Mair, A. Ariga, T. Ariga, A. Ereditato, R. Nishiyama, C. Pistillo, P. Scampoli, F. Schlunegger, and M. Vladymyrov, “Muon tomography in geoscientific research – a guide to best practice,” Earth-Sci. Rev., vol. 222, art. 103842, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. H. K. M. Tanaka, C. Bozza, A. Bross, et al., “Muography,” Nat. Rev. Methods Primers, vol. 3, art. 88, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. L. Bonechi, R. D’Alessandro, and A. Giammanco, “Atmospheric muons as an imaging tool,” Rev. Phys., vol. 5, art. 100038, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. C. Piemonte and A. Gola, “Overview on the main parameters and technology of modern silicon photomultipliers,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 926, pp. 2–15, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. F. Simon, “Silicon photomultipliers in particle and nuclear physics,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 926, pp. 85–100, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. S. Gundacker and A. Heering, “The silicon photomultiplier: fundamentals and applications of a modern solid-state photon detector,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 65, no. 17, art. 17TR01, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. S. Luo, C. Feng, G. Zeng, et al., “Image reconstruction techniques in muography: a review of algorithms and physical principles,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 138, no. 4, art. 041101, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. S. Pethuraj, V. M. Datar, G. Majumder, N. K. Mondal, K. C. Ravindran, and B. Satyanarayana, “Measurement of cosmic muon angular distribution and vertical integrated flux by 2 m × 2 m RPC stack at IICHEP-Madurai,” J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., vol. 2017, no. 09, art. 021, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. B. Olmos Yáñez and A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, “A method to measure the integral vertical intensity and angular distribution of atmospheric muons with a stationary plastic scintillator bar detector,” arXiv:1912.05462 (preprint), 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. R. C. Venterea and U. Ekka, “An analysis of muon flux from angle variation of the QuarkNet cosmic ray detector,” arXiv:2306.13689 (preprint), 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. S. Manithottathil, A. Gupta, M. Kumar, and N. Poonthottathil, “Characterization of an MPPC-based scintillator telescope and measurement of cosmic muon angular distribution,” arXiv:2602.16297 (preprint), 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 3, art. 030001, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), “Measurement of the charge ratio of atmospheric muons with the CMS detector,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 692, no. 2, pp. 83–104, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. T. Hebbeker and C. Timmermans, “A compilation of high energy atmospheric muon data at sea level,” arXiv:hep-ph/0102042 (preprint), 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. D. E. Groom, N. V. Mokhov, and S. I. Striganov, “Muon stopping power and range tables, 10 MeV–100 TeV,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 183–356, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. P. Shukla and S. Sankrith, “Energy and angular distributions of atmospheric muons at the Earth,” arXiv:1606.06907 (preprint), 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. M. Guan, M.-C. Chu, J. Cao, K.-B. Luk, and C. Yang, “A parametrization of the cosmic-ray muon flux at sea-level,” arXiv:1509.06176 (preprint), 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. T. K. Gaisser, Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. D. Chirkin, “Fluxes of atmospheric leptons at 600 GeV – 60 TeV,” arXiv:hep-ph/0407078 (preprint), 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. R. R. S. de Mendonça, C. R. Braga, E. Echer, et al., “The temperature effect in secondary cosmic rays (muons) observed at the ground: analysis of the Global Muon Detector Network data,” Astrophys. J., vol. 830, no. 2, art. 88, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Riádigos, D. García-Castro, D. González-Díaz, and V. Pérez-Muñuzuri, “Atmospheric temperature effect in secondary cosmic rays observed with a 2 m² ground-based tRPC detector,” Earth Space Sci., vol. 7, art. e2020EA001131, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. N. Borozdin, G. E. Hogan, C. Morris, W. C. Priedhorsky, A. Saunders, L. J. Schultz, and M. E. Teasdale, “Radiographic imaging with cosmic-ray muons,” Nature, vol. 422, p. 277, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. J. Schultz, K. N. Borozdin, J. J. Gomez, et al., “Image reconstruction and material Z discrimination via cosmic ray muon radiography,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 519, no. 3, pp. 687–694, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. J. B. Birks, The Theory and Practice of Scintillation Counting. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press, 1964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Eljen Technology, “General purpose plastic scintillators EJ-200, EJ-204, EJ-208, EJ-212,” manufacturer data sheet, accessed 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Pla-Dalmau, A. D. Bross, and K. L. Mellott, “Low-cost extruded plastic scintillator,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 466, no. 3, pp. 482–491, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Artikov, V. Baranov, G. C. Blazey, et al., “Photoelectron yields of scintillation counters with embedded wavelength-shifting fibers read out with silicon photomultipliers,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 890, pp. 84–95, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Peralta, “Temperature dependence of plastic scintillators,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 883, pp. 20–23, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Gamal, S. Aly, D. Geeraerts, et al., “The ScIDEP muon radiography project at the Egyptian Pyramid of Khafre,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 138, no. 4, art. 044901, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. F. Acerbi and S. Gundacker, “Understanding and simulating SiPMs,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 926, pp. 16–35, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. R. Klanner, “Characterisation of SiPMs,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 926, pp. 36–56, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. G. F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Hamamatsu Photonics, “How does temperature affect the gain of an SiPM?,” manufacturer technical note, accessed 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. F. Licciulli and C. Marzocca, “An active compensation system for the temperature dependence of SiPM gain,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 228–235, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. E. Garutti and Y. Musienko, “Radiation damage of SiPMs,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 926, pp. 69–84, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Y. Tao, Y. Ning, Y. Yuan, et al., “MuGrid-v2: a novel scintillator detector for multidisciplinary applications,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 138, no. 2, art. 024501, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. S. Hansen, T. Jordan, T. Kiper, D. Claes, G. Snow, H. Berns, T. H. Burnett, R. Gran, and R. J. Wilkes, “Low-cost data acquisition card for school-network cosmic ray detectors,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 926–930, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. H. Sogarwal and P. Shukla, “Measurement of atmospheric muon angular distribution using a portable setup of liquid scintillator bars,” arXiv:2202.01445 (preprint), 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. S. N. Axani, “The physics behind the CosmicWatch Desktop Muon Detectors,” arXiv:1908.00146 (preprint), 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. J. Masias, F. Delgado, L. Coll, A. Pérez, J. Bazo, and A. Gago, “Using a portable muon detector for radioactive source measurements and identification,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 944, art. 162588, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Anastasio, F. Ambrosino, D. Basta, et al., “The MU-RAY experiment: an application of SiPM technology to the understanding of volcanic phenomena,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 718, pp. 134–137, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. H. Yang, G. Luo, T. Yu, et al., “MuGrid: a scintillator detector towards cosmic muon absorption imaging,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 1042, art. 167402, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. QuarkNet, “Cosmic Ray Muon Detector User’s Manual,” Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL, USA, technical report, accessed 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. outreach event for astroparticle physics,” in Proc. 35th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. (ICRC2017), PoS(ICRC2017)405, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Y. Ning, Y. Yuan, T. Yu, et al., “Development of portable cosmic-ray muon detector array for muography,” arXiv:2503.18800 (preprint), 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Z. Liang, T. Hu, X. Li, Y. Wu, C. Li, and Z. Tang, “A cosmic ray imaging system based on plastic scintillator detector with SiPM readout,” J. Instrum., vol. 15, art. C07033, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Di Francesco, R. Bugalho, L. Oliveira, et al., “TOFPET2: a high-performance ASIC for time and amplitude measurements of SiPM signals in time-of-flight applications,” J. Instrum., vol. 11, art. C03042, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. J. D. Sullivan, “Geometrical factor and directional response of single and multi-element particle telescopes,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 1971. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. G. R. Thomas and D. M. Willis, “Analytical derivation of the geometric factor of a particle detector having circular or rectangular geometry,” J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 260, 1972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), “GEANT4 – a simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 506, no. 3, pp. 250–303, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. V. Anghel, J. Armitage, F. Baig, et al., “A plastic scintillator-based muon tomography system with an integrated muon spectrometer,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 798, pp. 12–23, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Bektasoglu and H. Arslan, “Investigation of the zenith angle dependence of cosmic-ray muons at sea level,” Pramana – J. Phys., vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 837–846, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Y. Elangovan, S. Kakkad, and B. Satyanarayana, “Cosmic Muon Explorer: a portable detector for cosmic muon flux measurements and outreach,” arXiv:2602.23674 (preprint), 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Checchia, “Review of possible applications of cosmic muon tomography,” J. Instrum., vol. 11, art. C12072, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. K. Nagamine, M. Iwasaki, K. Shimomura, and K. Ishida, “Method of probing inner-structure of geophysical substance with the horizontal cosmic-ray muons and possible application to volcanic eruption prediction,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, vol. 356, no. 2, pp. 585–595, 1995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. G. Liu, X. Luo, H. Tian, et al., “High-precision muography in archaeogeophysics: a case study on Xi’an defensive walls,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 133, no. 1, art. 014901, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. R. Han, Q. Yu, Z. Li, et al., “Cosmic muon flux measurement and tunnel overburden structure imaging,” J. Instrum., vol. 15, art. P06019, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. K. Morishima, M. Kuno, A. Nishio, et al., “Discovery of a big void in Khufu’s Pyramid by observation of cosmic-ray muons,” Nature, vol. 552, pp. 386–390, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. S. Procureur et al., “Precise characterization of a corridor-shaped structure in Khufu’s Pyramid by observation of cosmic-ray muons,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, art. 1144, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Z. X. Zhang, T. Enqvist, M. Holma, and P. Kuusiniemi, “Muography and its potential applications to mining and rock engineering,” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., vol. 53, pp. 4893–4907, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. G. Jonkmans, V. N. P. Anghel, C. Jewett, and M. Thompson, “Nuclear waste imaging and spent fuel verification by muon tomography,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 53, pp. 267–273, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. N. Zurlo, G. Bonomi, A. Donzella, D. Pagano, A. Zenoni, and G. Zumerle, “A new Monte Carlo muon generator for cosmic-ray muon applications,” PoS CompTools2021, art. 019, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. V. Niess, “The PUMAS library,” Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 279, art. 108438, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. T. Frach, G. Prescher, C. Degenhardt, R. de Gruyter, A. Schmitz, and R. Ballizany, “The digital silicon photomultiplier – principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance,” in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec., 2009, pp. 1959–1965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]