Socio-Economic Effect of Farmer Field School (FFS) on Rice Farmers in the Municipality of Pres. Manuel A. Roxas, Zamboanga Del Norte

Rice (Oryza sativa) is the primary staple food and an important agricultural commodity in the Philippines. This study assessed the socioeconomic effects of the Farmer Field School (FFS) program on rice farmers in the Municipality of Pres. Manuel A. Roxas, Zamboanga del Norte. A descriptive-quantitative research design was employed, involving 89 registered rice farmers who had completed FFS training in three purposively selected barangays. Data were collected using a structured survey questionnaire and analyzed through frequency counts, percentages, weighted means, a paired-samples t-test, and Somers’ D. The findings revealed that most respondents were older adults, female, married, elementary graduates, and primarily dependent on farming for their livelihood. The FFS technologies had an overall very large perceived effect on farming practices (AWV = 4.43), particularly in growing healthy seedlings, nutrient management, pest management, and harvest management. The program also produced a very large social effect (AWV = 4.40) and a large economic effect (AWV = 4.13), enabling farmers to better provide for their families’ education, nutrition, health, sanitation, housing, and other essential needs. Farmers’ average monthly income significantly increased from ₱4,797.75 before the program to ₱8,370.14 after its implementation (p < .001). Moreover, FFS technology transfer was positively and significantly associated with socioeconomic improvement (Somers’ D = 0.257, p = .003). The study concludes that the FFS program effectively strengthens farmers’ agricultural knowledge and practices while contributing to improved income and household well-being. Its continued implementation and expansion, supported by regular follow-up training and agricultural extension services, are therefore recommended.

Farmer Field School, rice farmers, socioeconomic effects, technology transfer

1. Agarwal, B. (2015). Gender Inequality and Food Security: The Case of Women Farmers in India. Agricultural Economics. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NDzKBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA273&dq=info:XQi3kjrgHSkJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=XLujhLU1PP&sig=g-hS0v-rx9QUv_GYRHwWGLheKJY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alvin D. Palanog, Cielo Luz C. Mondejar, Gerald E. Bello, Mark Ian C. Calayugan, May Osano Palanog, Xavier Greg Caguiat, … Leo T. Sta. Ines. (2020). Rice Breeding Strategies in the Philippines. Journal of Scientific Agriculture, 21–27. DOI:10.25081/jsa.2020.v4.6164’ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bartlett, A. (2005). Farmer Field Schools to promote Integrated Pest Management in Asia: The Food and Agriculture Organization Experience. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265158353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Berthelemy, F., et al. (2020). Long-Term Income Impacts of Farmer Field Schools on Rice Farmers: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Agricultural Development Review, 19(2), 225-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.adr.2020.04.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davis, K., et al. (2012). The Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Farmer Learning and Income. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46442014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Effect of Farmer Field School (FFS) on the Knowledge, Attitude, Practices and Profitability of Rice Farmers (2021). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357263273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Food and Agriculture Organization (2011). Farmer Field School Implementation Guide. https://www.fao.org/4/i2561e/i2561e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. FAO. (2016). Farmer Field Schools for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security. FAO Technical Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Francis Kastro Kavi (2021) Constraints in Rice Production on the Weta Irrigation Scheme in the Volta Region, Ghana https://www.gjournals.org/?s=farmer+field+school+on+rice+farmers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Froline S. Red, Nilda T. Amestoso, & Leomarich F. Casinillo. (2021). Effect of Farmer Field School (FFS) on the Knowledge, Attitude, Practices and Profitability of Rice Farmers. Philippine Social Science Journal (University of Negros Occidental-Recoletos- Online)/Philippine Social Science Journal (University of Negros Occidental-Recoletos-Print), 4(4), 145–154. DOI:10.52006/main.v4i4.420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gallagher, P., Kenmore, P., & Pontius, J. (2009). The Role of Farmer Field Schools in Integrated Pest Management. International Journal of Pest Management, 55(1), 53-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Henk Van Den Bergl and Bart Gl Knos (2006). The Farmer Field School: A method for Enhancing the Role of Rural Communities a Malaria control? https://malariajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2875-5-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hossain, M., et al. (2018). Farmer Field Schools and Income Stability in Rice Farming: Evidence from Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 113-124. DOI: 10.1111/agec.12392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kenmore, P., Pontius, J., & Gallagher, P. (2006). Farmer Field Schools: An Approach for Rural Development. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0754e.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumar, P., & Singh, R. (2013). Assessing the Effectiveness of Farmer Field Schools in Upland Rice Production. Rice Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lee, M. K., et al. (2014). Challenges in Implementing Farmer Field Schools: Lessons from Asia. World Development. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.90 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Maghinay, JM; Guro, AAB (2024). Implementation of Farmers Field School (FFS) Among Rice Farmers at Claran, Calamba, Mismis Occidental. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, https://www.gjournals.org/2024/05/12/041324048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2019). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.99 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nkonya, E., et al. (2011). Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Rice Farmer Incomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Tanzania and Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 42(3), 247-257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00506.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://archive.org/details/michael-quinn-patton-qualitative-research-evaluation-methods-integrating-theory-/mode/1up [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pontius, J., Kenmore, P., & Gallagher, P. (2002). Farmer Field Schools: A Handbook for Field Facilitators. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/fsn/docs/Farmer_Field_School [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Prasad, R., Shivay, Y. S., & Kumar, D. (2017). Current status, challenges, and opportunities in rice production. Rice production worldwide, 1-32. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47516-5_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pretty, J., et al. (2003). Social Capital and Farmers’ Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture: Evidence from Southern Africa. Agricultural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00087-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Singh, R., et al. (2017). Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Rice Farmer Income in South Asia: Evidence from India and Bangladesh. Agricultural Systems, 153, 91-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tenido et al., (2024) Government Programs On Eggplant Production: It's Socio-Economic Effect On Beneficiaries [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Van den Berg, H., & Jiggins, J. (2007). Investing in Farmers: The Impacts of Farmer Field Schools in the Philippines. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits